A Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model of Electoral Choice

This article develops a simultaneous equation model of the voting decision in a form thought to mirror the main lines of cognitive decision-making processes of individual voters. The model goes beyond earlier efforts in two respects. First, it explicitly represents the causal interdependence of voter assessments in the election situation, permitting such estimations as the degree to which correlations between voter issue positions and issue positions ascribed to preferred candidates arise because of projection onto the candidate or persuasion by the candidate. Secondly, the model is truly dynamic, in the sense that it is dependent on longitudinal data for its proper estimation. The utility of the model is certified by the goodness of fit achieved when applied to 1972–76 panel data for a sample of the national electorate.

[1]  A. Goldberg Discerning a Causal Pattern among Data on Voting Behavior , 1966, American Political Science Review.

[2]  P. Converse,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[3]  Richard A. Brody,et al.  Comment: The Assessment of Policy Voting , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[4]  A. Campbell Elections and the Political Order , 1968 .

[5]  Philip E. Converse,et al.  Plus ça change…: The New CPS Election Study Panel , 1979, American Political Science Review.

[6]  M. Hinich,et al.  An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process , 1970, American Political Science Review.

[7]  John E. Jackson Issues, Party Choices, and Presidential Votes , 1975 .

[8]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[9]  E. Declercq,et al.  Voting in American Presidential Elections 1956-1972 , 1975 .

[10]  Michael J. Shapiro Rational Political Man: A Synthesis of Economic and Social-Psychological Perspectives , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[11]  P. Allison Testing for Interaction in Multiple Regression , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The quantitative analysis of social problems , 1971 .

[13]  Arthur H. Miller,et al.  A Majority Party in Disarray: Policy Polarization in the 1972 Election , 1976, American Political Science Review.

[14]  G. Pomper,et al.  Variability in Electoral Behavior: Longitudinal Perspectives from Causal Modeling , 1975 .

[15]  Howard Wainer,et al.  Estimating Coefficients in Linear Models: It Don't Make No Nevermind , 1976 .

[16]  David E. RePass Issue Salience and Party Choice , 1929, American Political Science Review.

[17]  G. Pomper From Confusion to Clarity: Issues and American Voters, 1956–1968 , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[18]  R. Dawes,et al.  Linear models in decision making. , 1974 .

[19]  Benjamin I. Page,et al.  Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the Vote , 1979, American Political Science Review.

[20]  W. Riker,et al.  A Theory of the Calculus of Voting , 1968, American Political Science Review.

[21]  Richard A. Brody,et al.  Indifference, alientation and rational decisions , 1973 .

[22]  Christopher H. Achen Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response , 1975, American Political Science Review.

[23]  Stanley Kelley,et al.  The Simple Act of Voting , 1974 .

[24]  J. Ferejohn,et al.  Closeness Counts Only in Horseshoes and Dancing , 1975, American Political Science Review.

[25]  Richard A. Brody,et al.  Policy Voting and the Electoral Process: The Vietnam War Issue , 1972, American Political Science Review.