Gender role and the use of university library website resources: A social cognitive theory perspective

Existing studies have reported that significant gender differences exist in the use of technology. For example, males have higher levels of computer self-efficacy, which enable them to utilize technology more so than their counterparts. This difference could create a potential disparity in the benefits of the utilization of university library website resources (ULWR). The findings of this study show that male and female users’ computer self-efficacy is very different. Female users have lower levels of computer self-efficacy and subsequently, their intention to use ULWR is derived from a website’s ease-of-use. In contrast, male users’ intentions to use ULWR are derived from the subjective norm, a finding that challenges expectations based on social cognitive theory which posits that females are more likely than males to be influenced by others’ opinions. It is interpreted that males are much more goal- and performance-oriented than females. Detailed theoretical and managerial implications are offered.

[1]  Jeffrey H. Kahn,et al.  A multiple-groups analysis of predictors of higher level career aspirations among women in mathematics, science, and engineering majors , 1998 .

[2]  J. Heller,et al.  Some men like it black, some women like it pink: consumer implications of differences in male and female website design , 2006 .

[3]  Rex Karsten,et al.  Business Student Computer Self-Efficacy: Ten Years Later , 2008, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[4]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Bringing Young Women to Math and Science , 1989 .

[5]  John H. Barnett,et al.  Managers, values, and executive decisions: An exploration of the role of gender, career stage, organizational level, function, and the importance of ethics, relationships and results in managerial decision-making , 1989 .

[6]  Denise E. Agosto,et al.  The Female-Friendly Public Library: Gender Differences in Adolescents’ Uses and Perceptions of U.S. Public Libraries , 2008, Libr. Trends.

[7]  K. Bussey,et al.  The social learning theory of sex differences: Imitation is alive and well. , 1979 .

[8]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: an extension to the theory of planned behavior , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[9]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies , 1997 .

[10]  R. Acevedo,et al.  Research report , 1967, Revista odontologica de Puerto Rico.

[11]  Jack Meadows,et al.  The impact of computer usage on scholarly communication among social scientists , 2000, J. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Oded Nov,et al.  Resistance to change and the adoption of digital libraries: An integrative model , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[14]  R. Moenaert,et al.  The Adoption of Information Technology in the Sales Force , 2005 .

[15]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  S. Cross,et al.  Models of the self: self-construals and gender. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Mary Crawford,et al.  Cognition in social context , 1995 .

[18]  Dianna L. Stone,et al.  Relations Among Ethnicity, Gender, Beliefs, Attitudes, and Intention to Pursue a Career in Information Technology , 2008 .

[19]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[20]  J. KARLG. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE AND CORRELATION MATRICES , 2000 .

[21]  Janet Shibley Hyde,et al.  Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: a meta-analysis. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  M. Lamont Gender, Technology, and Libraries , 2009 .

[23]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[24]  Namkee Park,et al.  User acceptance of a digital library system in developing countries: An application of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[25]  Dale H. Schunk,et al.  Sex Differences in Self-Efficacy and Attributions: Influence of Performance Feedback , 1984 .

[26]  Jong-Ae Kim,et al.  Toward an understanding of Web-based subscription database acceptance , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  이훈,et al.  지각된 유용성(Perceived Usefulness)의 영향분석 , 2004 .

[28]  Xiaobin Huang,et al.  Gender differences in the online reading environment , 2008, J. Documentation.

[29]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Perceived influence of the use of electronic information resources on scholarly work and publication productivity , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  B. Byrne The Maslach Burnout Inventory: Testing for factorial validity and invariance across elementary, intermediate and secondary teachers , 1993 .

[31]  Peter Burke,et al.  Gender identity, sex, and school performance , 1989 .

[32]  Yong-Mi Kim,et al.  Validation of psychometric research instruments: The case of information science , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[34]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions. , 1982 .

[35]  Yong-Mi Kim The adoption of university library Web site resources: A multigroup analysis , 2010 .

[36]  June Abbas,et al.  Adoption of Library 2.0 Functionalities by Academic Libraries and Users: A Knowledge Management Perspective , 2010 .

[37]  Ghulam Muhammad Kundi,et al.  Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce , 2022 .

[38]  Regina Vollmeyer,et al.  Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[39]  Robert F. Easley,et al.  Research Note - How Does Personality Matter? Relating the Five-Factor Model to Technology Acceptance and Use , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  Harvie Ramsay,et al.  The status of women in the UK IT industry: an empirical study , 1999 .

[41]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[43]  James C. Quick Thinking styles and job stress , 1986 .

[44]  Sarah Welsh Managers , 2011, BMJ.

[45]  Jack J. Baroudi,et al.  The impact of job performance evaluations on career advancement prospects: an examination of gender differences in the IS workplace , 1995 .

[46]  Tracy Ann Sykes,et al.  Individual Reactions to New Technologies in the Workplace: The Role of Gender as a Psychological Construct , 2004 .

[47]  J. Stockard,et al.  Gender Roles and Behavior in Social Dilemmas: Are There Sex Differences in Cooperation and in Its Justification? , 1988 .

[48]  Xiaohui Liu,et al.  The role of human factors in stereotyping behavior and perception of digital library users: a robust clustering approach , 2007, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[49]  Gender Differences in the College and Career Aspirations of High School Valedictorians , 2008 .

[50]  New York Time Magazine Attitudes Towards Computers , 1974 .

[51]  T. Roberts,et al.  Gender and the influence of evaluations on self-assessments in achievement settings. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[52]  Charles D. Barrett Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[53]  B. Whitley Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes and Behavior: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[54]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .

[55]  John H. Heinrichs,et al.  Determining factors of academic library Web site usage , 2007 .

[56]  Camillo Regalia,et al.  Longitudinal Impact of Perceived Self-Regulatory Efficacy on Violent Conduct , 2002 .

[57]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  Individual differences and usage behavior: revisiting a technology acceptance model assumption , 2005, DATB.

[59]  LeAnne Coder,et al.  Economic and business dimensionsIncreasing gender diversity in the IT work force , 2009, CACM.

[60]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[61]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Factors influencing personal computer usage: the gender gap , 1996 .

[62]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[63]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  Understanding competing application usage with the theory of planned behavior , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[64]  M. Lundeberg,et al.  Highly Confident, but Wrong: Gender Differences and Similarities in Confidence Judgments. , 1994 .

[65]  James M. O'Neil,et al.  Gender-Role Conflict and Strain in Men’s Lives , 1982 .

[66]  A. Bandura,et al.  Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children's aspirations and career trajectories. , 2001, Child development.

[67]  A. Bandura,et al.  Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[68]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[69]  A. Bandura,et al.  On broadening the cognitive, motivational, and sociostructural scope of theorizing about gender development and functioning: comment on Martin, Ruble, and Szkrybalo (2002). , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[70]  Anna M Caroline Van Scoyoc,et al.  The Electronic Academic Library: Undergraduate Research Behavior in a Library Without Books , 2006 .

[71]  Namok Choi Sex Role Group Differences in Specific, Academic, and General Self-Efficacy , 2004, The Journal of psychology.

[72]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage , 1999 .

[73]  J. Miller,et al.  Toward a new psychology of women , 1976 .

[74]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[75]  G. Rotter,et al.  Group and Individual Effects in Problem Solving. , 1969 .

[76]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[77]  Patricia A. Adler,et al.  Socialization to Gender Roles: Popularity among Elementary School Boys and Girls. , 1992 .

[78]  Yong-Mi Kim,et al.  Users' perceptions of university library websites: A unifying view , 2011 .

[79]  Per E. Pedersen,et al.  Explaining intention to use mobile chat services: moderating effects of gender , 2005 .

[80]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance , 1994 .

[81]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  Adult and Teenage Use of Consumer, Business, and Entertainment Technology: Potholes on the Information Superhighway? , 1995 .

[82]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[83]  Jean Stockard,et al.  Measuring gender differences: The expressive dimension and critique of androgyny scales , 1987 .

[84]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[85]  Cynthia M. Jackson,et al.  Toward an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use an Information System , 1997 .

[86]  R. Carlson,et al.  Sex differences in ego functioning: exploratory studies of agency and communion. , 1970, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[87]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[88]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Reporting sex differences. , 1987 .

[89]  Nancy C.A. Roeske,et al.  Toward a New Psychology of Women , 1977 .

[90]  Jeonghyun Kim,et al.  Task as a Context of Information Seeking: An Investigation of Daily Life Tasks on the Web , 2008 .

[91]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[92]  Rachel Applegate Faculty information assignments : A longitudinal examination of variations in survey results , 2006 .

[93]  R. F. Mottram,et al.  GENDER IDENTITY , 1979, The Lancet.

[94]  Rosalind C. Barnett,et al.  The relationship between women's work and family roles and their subjective well-being and psychological distress. , 1991 .

[95]  Carol R. Glass,et al.  Computers, anxiety, and gender: an analysis of reactions to the Y2K computer problem , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[96]  Cliff McKnight,et al.  A study of users’ performance and satisfaction with the Web of Science IR interface , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[97]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[98]  Cathy S. Lin,et al.  Assessing Gender Differences in Computer Professionals’ Self-Regulatory Efficacy Concerning Information Privacy Practices , 2007 .

[99]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy - An Empirical Assessment , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[100]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[101]  R. J. Beynon,et al.  Computers , 1985, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[102]  AgarwalRitu,et al.  Reconceptualizing compatability beliefs in technology acceptance research , 2006 .

[103]  Hanudin Amin Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce Internet Banking Adoption among Young Intellectuals , 2022 .

[104]  Claudio R. Nigg,et al.  The Theory of Planned Behavior Within the Stages of the Transtheoretical Model: Latent Structural Modeling of Stage-Specific Prediction Patterns in Physical Activity , 2007 .

[105]  Venkatesh,et al.  A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision-Making Processes. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[106]  P. Nick Blanchard,et al.  Sex differences in task and social-emotional behavior. , 1982 .

[107]  A. H. Stein,et al.  The socialization of achievement orientation in females. , 1973 .

[108]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Searching for Information on-Line and off-Line: Gender Differences among Middle School Students , 2003 .

[109]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  Gender Differences in Information Technology Usage: A U.S.-Japan Comparison , 2004 .

[110]  B. Whitley Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes: It Depends on What You Ask. , 1996 .

[111]  T. Busch Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy and Attitudes toward Computers , 1995 .

[112]  Jamshid Beheshti,et al.  Gender differences in collaborative Web searching behavior: an elementary school study , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..

[113]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 1996 .

[114]  M. Ford,et al.  Gender Differences in Student Financial Market Attitudes and Awareness: An Exploratory Study , 2009 .

[115]  P. Okebukola,et al.  The gender factor in computer anxiety and interest among some Australian high school students , 1993 .

[116]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[117]  Niki Panteli,et al.  Gendered patterns in computing work in the late 1990s , 2001 .

[118]  Manuel J. Sánchez-Franco,et al.  Exploring the influence of gender on the web usage via partial least squares , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[119]  Peter Willett,et al.  Brief communication: Gender differences in publication and citation counts in librarianship and information science research , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[120]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: a longitudinal study , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[121]  L. Hoffman Early Childhood Experiences and Women's Achievement Motives , 1972 .

[122]  Giannis Tsakonas,et al.  Analysing and evaluating usefulness and usability in electronic information services , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[123]  Francisco Muñoz-Leiva,et al.  Web Acceptance Model (WAM): Moderating effects of user experience , 2007, Inf. Manag..