Cost and health outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolysis in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-Results of the Swedish Early Decision reperfusion Study (SWEDES) trial.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Martin Henriksson | Magnus Janzon | Johan Herlitz | Mikael Aasa | Leif Svensson | L. Levin | L. Svensson | J. Herlitz | M. Dellborg | M. Janzon | M. Henriksson | Lars Grip | L. Grip | Mikael Dellborg | Lars-Ake Levin | M. Aasa
[1] H. Suryapranata,et al. A cost-effective analysis of primary coronary angioplasty versus thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.
[2] G. Lamas,et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[3] P. Touboul,et al. Primary angioplasty is cost-minimizing compared with pre-hospital thrombolysis for patients within 60 min of a percutaneous coronary intervention center: the Comparison of Angioplasty and Pre-hospital Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAPTIM) cost-efficacy sub-study. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[4] R. Brooks. EuroQol: the current state of play. , 1996, Health policy.
[5] Michael Weis,et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2008, European heart journal.
[6] J. O’Keefe,et al. Analysis of the relative costs and effectiveness of primary angioplasty versus tissue-type plasminogen activator: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trial. The PAMI Trial Investigators. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[7] M. Simoons,et al. Cost-utility analysis of thrombolytic therapy. , 1991, European Heart Journal.
[8] Frans Van de Werf,et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2003 .
[9] William W O'Neill,et al. A randomized trial of transfer for primary angioplasty versus on-site thrombolysis in patients with high-risk myocardial infarction: the Air Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction study. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[10] Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2004 .
[11] G. Nichol,et al. Hospitalization Costs of Primary Stenting Versus Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Cost Analysis of the Canadian STAT Study , 2003, Circulation.
[12] P. Touboul,et al. Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a randomised study , 2002, The Lancet.
[13] J. Boura,et al. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction : a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials , 2022 .
[14] P. Dolan,et al. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. , 1997, Medical care.
[15] S. Halvorsen,et al. Cost-effectiveness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction , 2005, Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ.
[16] J. Ornato,et al. 2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[17] A. Kirtane,et al. Comparison of very early treatment with either fibrinolysis or percutaneous coronary intervention facilitated with abciximab with respect to ST recovery and infarct-related artery epicardial flow in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the Swedish Early Decision (SWEDES) r , 2006, American heart journal.
[19] Robert Tibshirani,et al. An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .
[20] L. Levin,et al. Cost-effectiveness of an invasive strategy in unstable coronary artery disease; results from the FRISC II invasive trial. The Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease. , 2002, European heart journal.