Accelerated evolution of PAK3- and PIM1-like kinase gene families in the zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata.

Genes encoding protein kinases tend to evolve slowly over evolutionary time, and only rarely do they appear as recent duplications in sequenced vertebrate genomes. Consequently, it was a surprise to find two families of kinase genes that have greatly and recently expanded in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) lineage. In contrast to other amniotic genomes (including chicken) that harbor only single copies of p21-activated serine/threonine kinase 3 (PAK3) and proviral integration site 1 (PIM1) genes, the zebra finch genome appeared at first to additionally contain 67 PAK3-like (PAK3L) and 51 PIM1-like (PIM1L) protein kinase genes. An exhaustive analysis of these gene models, however, revealed most to be incomplete, owing to the absence of terminal exons. After reprediction, 31 PAK3L genes and 10 PIM1L genes remain, and all but three are predicted, from the retention of functional sites and open reading frames, to be enzymatically active. PAK3L, but not PIM1L, gene sequences show evidence of recurrent episodes of positive selection, concentrated within structures spatially adjacent to N- and C-terminal protein regions that have been discarded from zebra finch PAK3L genes. At least seven zebra finch PAK3L genes were observed to be expressed in testis, whereas two sequences were found transcribed in the brain, one broadly including the song nuclei and the other in the ventricular zone and in cells resembling Bergmann's glia in the cerebellar Purkinje cell layer. Two PIM1L sequences were also observed to be expressed with broad distributions in the zebra finch brain, one in both the ventricular zone and the cerebellum and apparently associated with glial cells and the other showing neuronal cell expression and marked enrichment in midbrain/thalamic nuclei. These expression patterns do not correlate with zebra finch-specific features such as vocal learning. Nevertheless, our results show how ancient and conserved intracellular signaling molecules can be co-opted, following duplication, thereby resulting in lineage-specific functions, presumably affecting the zebra finch testis and brain.

[1]  C. Mello,et al.  Brain expression and song regulation of the cholecystokinin gene in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) , 2011, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  Albert J. Vilella,et al.  The genome of a songbird , 2010, Nature.

[3]  Sarah E. London,et al.  Integrating Genomes, Brain and Behavior in the Study of Songbirds , 2009, Current Biology.

[4]  Bart Kempenaers,et al.  A comparison of reptilian and avian olfactory receptor gene repertoires: Species-specific expansion of group γ genes in birds , 2009, BMC Genomics.

[5]  Da-Qiang Li,et al.  PAK Signaling in Oncogenesis , 2009, Oncogene.

[6]  Peter A. Meric,et al.  Lineage-Specific Biology Revealed by a Finished Genome Assembly of the Mouse , 2009, PLoS biology.

[7]  J. Barnier,et al.  PAK signalling in neuronal physiology. , 2009, Cellular signalling.

[8]  R. Pfundt,et al.  Reduced purifying selection prevails over positive selection in human copy number variant evolution. , 2008, Genome research.

[9]  Claudio V. Mello,et al.  Birdsong “Transcriptomics”: Neurochemical Specializations of the Oscine Song System , 2008, PloS one.

[10]  Chris P. Ponting,et al.  The functional repertoires of metazoan genomes , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  R. Nielsen,et al.  Patterns of Positive Selection in Six Mammalian Genomes , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[12]  E. Thévenot,et al.  The four mammalian splice variants encoded by the p21‐activated kinase 3 gene have different biological properties , 2008, Journal of neurochemistry.

[13]  Kazutaka Katoh,et al.  Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program , 2008, Briefings Bioinform..

[14]  Lei Liu,et al.  The Songbird Neurogenomics (SoNG) Initiative: Community-based tools and strategies for study of brain gene function and evolution , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[15]  D. Mindell,et al.  Strong mitochondrial DNA support for a Cretaceous origin of modern avian lineages , 2008, BMC Biology.

[16]  C. Ponting,et al.  Evolutionary rate analyses of orthologs and paralogs from 12 Drosophila genomes. , 2007, Genome research.

[17]  Andreas Heger,et al.  OPTIC: orthologous and paralogous transcripts in clades , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  Ziheng Yang PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[19]  S. Lipton,et al.  Takusan: A Large Gene Family that Regulates Synaptic Activity , 2007, Neuron.

[20]  I. Cobos,et al.  Dlx Transcription Factors Promote Migration through Repression of Axon and Dendrite Growth , 2007, Neuron.

[21]  Leo Goodstadt,et al.  Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Orthology, Paralogy, and Conserved Synteny for Dog and Human , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  A. Baker,et al.  A mitogenomic timescale for birds detects variable phylogenetic rates of molecular evolution and refutes the standard molecular clock. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[23]  M. Li,et al.  Stem cell marker expression in the Bergmann glia population of the adult mouse brain , 2006, Brain Research.

[24]  Peer Bork,et al.  PAL2NAL: robust conversion of protein sequence alignments into the corresponding codon alignments , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  Anupama E. Gururaj,et al.  p21-activated kinases in cancer , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[26]  Jinsong Meng,et al.  Abnormal Long-Lasting Synaptic Plasticity and Cognition in Mice Lacking the Mental Retardation Gene Pak3 , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  W. Wong,et al.  Bayes empirical bayes inference of amino acid sites under positive selection. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[28]  Yoshihisa Suzuki,et al.  Crystal structures of proto-oncogene kinase Pim1: a target of aberrant somatic hypermutations in diffuse large cell lymphoma. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Jun Li,et al.  Structural Basis of Constitutive Activity and a Unique Nucleotide Binding Mode of Human Pim-1 Kinase* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  Ewan Birney,et al.  Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[31]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[32]  Hirohisa Kishino,et al.  Estimating absolute rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution in order to characterize natural selection and date species divergences. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[33]  Jos Jonkers,et al.  Mice Deficient for All PIM Kinases Display Reduced Body Size and Impaired Responses to Hematopoietic Growth Factors , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[34]  L. Wilbrecht,et al.  Neuron Addition and Loss in the Song System: Regulation and Function , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Johannes Müller,et al.  Molecular timescales and the fossil record: a paleontological perspective. , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[36]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[37]  G. Bokoch Biology of the p21-activated kinases. , 2003, Annual review of biochemistry.

[38]  O. Gascuel,et al.  A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[39]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models , 2003, Bioinform..

[40]  Wei Lu,et al.  Directional Sensing Requires Gβγ-Mediated PAK1 and PIXα-Dependent Activation of Cdc42 , 2003, Cell.

[41]  R. Ivell,et al.  SPEER—A New Family of Testis-Specific Genes from the Mouse1 , 2003, Biology of reproduction.

[42]  Richard D Emes,et al.  Comparison of the genomes of human and mouse lays the foundation of genome zoology. , 2003, Human molecular genetics.

[43]  N. Morin,et al.  A New Constitutively Active Brain PAK3 Isoform Displays Modified Specificities toward Rac and Cdc42 GTPases* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[44]  T. Pieler,et al.  XPak3 promotes cell cycle withdrawal during primary neurogenesis in Xenopus laevis , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[45]  S. Blair Hedges,et al.  The origin and evolution of model organisms , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[46]  S. Dhanasekaran,et al.  Delineation of prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer , 2001, Nature.

[47]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees , 2001, Bioinform..

[48]  Z. Yang,et al.  Maximum-likelihood analysis of molecular adaptation in abalone sperm lysin reveals variable selective pressures among lineages and sites. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[49]  Wange Lu,et al.  Structure of PAK1 in an Autoinhibited Conformation Reveals a Multistage Activation Switch , 2000, Cell.

[50]  J. Frost,et al.  Reciprocal Signaling between Heterotrimeric G Proteins and the p21-stimulated Protein Kinase* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[51]  C. Walsh,et al.  PAK3 mutation in nonsyndromic X-linked mental retardation , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[52]  Z. Yang,et al.  Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[53]  R. Nielsen,et al.  Synonymous and nonsynonymous rate variation in nuclear genes of mammals , 1998, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[54]  R. Nielsen,et al.  Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. , 1998, Genetics.

[55]  G. Bokoch,et al.  Membrane targeting of p21‐activated kinase 1 (PAK1) induces neurite outgrowth from PC12 cells , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[56]  Joseph D. Schrag,et al.  Interaction of a G-protein β-subunit with a conserved sequence in Ste20/PAK family protein kinases , 1998, Nature.

[57]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[58]  Roderic D. M. Page,et al.  TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers , 1996, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[59]  C. Hall,et al.  Molecular Cloning of a New Member of the p21-Cdc42/Rac-activated Kinase (PAK) Family (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[60]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[61]  A. Berns,et al.  Predisposition to lymphomagenesis in pim-1 transgenic mice: Cooperation with c-myc and N-myc in murine leukemia virus-induced tumors , 1989, Cell.

[62]  A. Berns,et al.  Proviral activation of the putative oncogene Pim‐1 in MuLV induced T‐cell lymphomas. , 1985, The EMBO journal.

[63]  Wim Quint,et al.  Murine leukemia virus-induced T-cell lymphomagenesis: Integration of proviruses in a distinct chromosomal region , 1984, Cell.

[64]  Albert J. Vilella,et al.  EnsemblCompara GeneTrees: Complete, duplication-aware phylogenetic trees in vertebrates. , 2009, Genome research.