Characterizing Bitterness: Identification of Key Structural Features and Development of a Classification Model

This work describes the first approach in the development of a comprehensive classification method for bitterness of small molecules. The data set comprises 649 bitter and 13 530 randomly selected molecules from the MDL Drug Data Repository (MDDR) which are analyzed by circular fingerprints (MOLPRINT 2D) and information-gain feature selection. The feature selection proposes substructural features which are statistically correlated to bitterness. Classification is performed on the selected features via a naïve Bayes classifier. The substructural features upon which the classification is based are able to discriminate between bitter and random compounds, and thus we propose they are also functionally responsible for causing the bitter taste. Such substructures include various sugar moieties as well as highly branched carbon scaffolds. Cynaropicrine contains a number of the substructural features found to be statistically associated with bitterness and thus was correctly predicted to be bitter by our model. Alternatively, both promethazine and saccharin contain fewer of these substructural features, and thus the bitterness in these compounds was not identified. Two different classes of bitter compounds were identified, namely those which are larger and contain mainly oxygen and carbon and often sugar moieties, and those which are rather smaller and contain additional nitrogen and/or sulfur fragments. The classifier is able to predict 72.1% of the bitter compounds. Feature selection reduces the number of false-positives while also increasing the number of false negatives to 69.5% of bitter compounds correctly predicted. Overall, the method presented here presents both one of the largest databases of bitter compounds presently available as well as a relatively reliable classification method.

[1]  R. Glen,et al.  Similarity searching of chemical databases using atom environment descriptors : evaluation of performance , 2004 .

[2]  Andreas Bender,et al.  Molecular Similarity Searching Using Atom Environments, Information-Based Feature Selection, and a Naïve Bayesian Classifier , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[3]  N. Ryba,et al.  T2Rs Function as Bitter Taste Receptors , 2000, Cell.

[4]  K. Gannon,et al.  Transduction of bitter and sweet taste by gustducin , 1996, Nature.

[5]  A. Pronin,et al.  Identification of ligands for two human bitter T2R receptors. , 2004, Chemical senses.

[6]  R. Glen,et al.  Molecular similarity: a key technique in molecular informatics. , 2004, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.

[7]  Thomas Hofmann,et al.  Bitter Taste Receptors for Saccharin and Acesulfame K , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  N. Chaudhari,et al.  A metabotropic glutamate receptor variant functions as a taste receptor , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  K. Beam,et al.  Apical localization of K+ channels in taste cells provides the basis for sour taste transduction. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  R. Cramer,et al.  Validation of the general purpose tripos 5.2 force field , 1989 .

[11]  Jayaram Chandrashekar,et al.  A Novel Family of Mammalian Taste Receptors , 2000, Cell.

[12]  J. Desimone,et al.  Salt taste transduction occurs through an amiloride-sensitive sodium transport pathway. , 1984, Science.

[13]  Sarah L. Rodgers,et al.  Building a tree of knowledge: analysis of bitter molecules. , 2005, Chemical senses.

[14]  Anthony E. Klon,et al.  Application of Machine Learning To Improve the Results of High-Throughput Docking Against the HIV-1 Protease , 2004, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.

[15]  W. J. Spillane,et al.  Further studies on the synthesis and tastes of monosubstituted benzenesulfamates. A semi-quantitative structure–taste relationship for the meta-compounds , 2002 .

[16]  Kumiko Ninomiya Umami: a universal taste , 2002 .

[17]  C. Cho,et al.  A major inducer of anticarcinogenic protective enzymes from broccoli: isolation and elucidation of structure. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  W. Meyerhof,et al.  Elucidation of mammalian bitter taste. , 2005, Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology.

[19]  K. Glanz,et al.  Why Americans eat what they do: taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. , 1998, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[20]  Jérôme Hert,et al.  Comparison of Fingerprint-Based Methods for Virtual Screening Using Multiple Bioactive Reference Structures , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[21]  S S Schiffman,et al.  Effect of protease inhibitors on the sense of taste. , 1999, Nutrition.

[22]  G Licitra,et al.  Chemometric analysis of Ragusano cheese flavor. , 2002, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[23]  Karl Heinz Ney,et al.  Bitterness of Peptides: Amino Acid Composition and Chain Length , 1979 .

[24]  M. Behrens,et al.  The human taste receptor hTAS2R14 responds to a variety of different bitter compounds. , 2004, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[25]  Dietmar Krautwurst,et al.  The human TAS2R16 receptor mediates bitter taste in response to β-glucopyranosides , 2002, Nature Genetics.