An item bank typically contains items from several tests that have been calibrated by administering them to different groups of examinees. The parameters of the items must be linked onto a common scale. A linking technique consists of an anchoring design and a transformation method. Four basic anchoring designs are the unanchored, anchor-items, anchor-group, and double-anchor designs. The transformation design con sists of the system of equations that is used to trans late the anchor information and put the item parame ters on a common scale. Several transformation methods are discussed briefly. A simulation study is presented that compared the equivalent-groups method with the anchor-items method, using varying numbers of common items, applied both to the situation in which the groups were equivalent and one in which they were not. The results confirm previous findings that the equivalent-groups method is adequate when the groups are in fact equivalent. When the groups are not equivalent, accurate linking can be obtained with as few as two common items. Linking using a more efficient interlaced anchor-items design can provide accurate linking without the expense of including ex plicit common items in each of the tests.
[1]
Fritz Drasgow,et al.
Item response theory : application to psychological measurement
,
1983
.
[2]
C. David Vale,et al.
ASCAL: A Microcomputer Program for Estimating Logistic IRT Item Parameters.
,
1985
.
[3]
A Minimum Chi-Square Method for Developing a Common Metric in Item Response Theory
,
1985
.
[4]
Martha L. Stocking,et al.
Developing a Common Metric in Item Response Theory
,
1982
.
[5]
I. Bejar,et al.
An Application of Item Response Theory to Equating the Test of Standard
,
1981
.
[6]
F. Lord,et al.
An Investigation of Methods for Reducing Sampling Error in Certain IRT Procedures
,
1983
.
[7]
Malcolm James Ree,et al.
Item Characteristic Curve Parameters: Effects of Sample Size on Linear Equating.
,
1980
.
[8]
Gary L. Marco,et al.
Item characteristic curve solutions to three intractable testing problems.
,
1977
.
[9]
Melvin R. Novick,et al.
Some latent train models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability
,
1966
.
[10]
F. Lord.
Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems
,
1980
.