Applying Quantitative CT Image Feature Analysis to Predict Response of Ovarian Cancer Patients to Chemotherapy.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The study aimed to investigate the role of applying quantitative image features computed from computed tomography (CT) images for early prediction of tumor response to chemotherapy in the clinical trials for treating ovarian cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A dataset involving 91 patients was retrospectively assembled. Each patient had two sets of pre- and post-therapy CT images. A computer-aided detection scheme was applied to segment metastatic tumors previously tracked by radiologists on CT images and computed image features. Two initial feature pools were built using image features computed from pre-therapy CT images only and image feature difference computed from both pre- and post-therapy images. A feature selection method was applied to select optimal features, and an equal-weighted fusion method was used to generate a new quantitative imaging marker from each pool to predict 6-month progression-free survival. The prediction accuracy between quantitative imaging markers and the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria was also compared. RESULTS The highest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve are 0.684 ± 0.056 and 0.771 ± 0.050 when using a single image feature computed from pre-therapy CT images and feature difference computed from pre- and post-therapy CT images, respectively. Using two corresponding fusion-based image markers, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve significantly increased to 0.810 ± 0.045 and 0.829 ± 0.043 (P < 0.05), respectively. Overall prediction accuracy levels are 71.4%, 80.2%, and 74.7% when using two imaging markers and RECIST, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated the feasibility of predicting patients' response to chemotherapy using quantitative imaging markers computed from pre-therapy CT images. However, using image feature difference computed between pre- and post-therapy CT images yielded higher prediction accuracy.

[1]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.

[2]  Stan B. Kaye,et al.  Imaging ovarian cancer and peritoneal metastases—current and emerging techniques , 2010, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Michael L Maitland,et al.  RECIST: no longer the sharpest tool in the oncology clinical trials toolbox---point. , 2012, Cancer research.

[4]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Improving efficacy of metastatic tumor segmentation to facilitate early prediction of ovarian cancer patients' response to chemotherapy , 2017, BiOS.

[5]  M. Okada,et al.  [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)]. , 2009, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[6]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Integrated Genomic Analyses of Ovarian Carcinoma , 2011, Nature.

[7]  Shiju Yan,et al.  Improving lung cancer prognosis assessment by incorporating synthetic minority oversampling technique and score fusion method. , 2016, Medical physics.

[8]  Rebecca L. Siegel Mph,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2016 , 2016 .

[9]  N. Karssemeijer,et al.  An automatic method to discriminate malignant masses from normal tissue in digital mammograms1 , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Early prediction of clinical benefit of treating ovarian cancer using quantitative CT image feature analysis , 2016, Acta radiologica.

[11]  Richard G Abramson,et al.  Pitfalls in RECIST Data Extraction for Clinical Trials: Beyond the Basics. , 2015, Academic radiology.

[12]  Xiaoou Tang,et al.  Texture information in run-length matrices , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[13]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Quantitative measurement of adiposity using CT images to predict the benefit of bevacizumab-based chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer patients. , 2016, Oncology letters.

[14]  R. Caltabiano,et al.  MR imaging of ovarian masses: classification and differential diagnosis , 2015, Insights into Imaging.

[15]  Gang Huang,et al.  CA 125, PET alone, PET-CT, CT and MRI in diagnosing recurrent ovarian carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[16]  David Gur,et al.  A method to improve visual similarity of breast masses for an interactive computer-aided diagnosis environment. , 2005, Medical physics.

[17]  Bangjun Lei,et al.  Classification, Parameter Estimation and State Estimation: An Engineering Approach Using MATLAB, 2nd Edition , 2017 .

[18]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2016 , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[19]  Zheng Li,et al.  A New Approach to Evaluate Drug Treatment Response of Ovarian Cancer Patients Based on Deformable Image Registration , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  D. Fischerová,et al.  Imaging techniques for the evaluation of ovarian cancer. , 2014, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[21]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Applying a new quantitative global breast MRI feature analysis scheme to assess tumor response to chemotherapy , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  Anne Fleissig,et al.  The value of progression-free survival to patients with advanced-stage cancer , 2012, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[23]  C. Metz,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  Hong Liu,et al.  A two-step convolutional neural network based computer-aided detection scheme for automatically segmenting adipose tissue volume depicting on CT images , 2017, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[25]  F. Collins,et al.  A new initiative on precision medicine. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  T. Subba Rao,et al.  Classification, Parameter Estimation and State Estimation: An Engineering Approach Using MATLAB , 2004 .

[27]  B J McNeil,et al.  Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: comparison of imaging modalities--report from the Radiological Diagnostic Oncology Group. , 2000, Radiology.

[28]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..