Precision, reproducibility and applicability of an undersampled multi-venc 4D flow MRI sequence for the assessment of cardiac hemodynamics.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE For the assessment of cardiovascular blood flow, 2D flow (2D) and 4D flow with a single venc (4D Mono) are established techniques. The objective of this study was to validate a multi-venc 4D flow (4D Multi) sequence for the improved simultaneous assessment of arterial and venous flow in high and low flow conditions and to investigate the scan-rescan reproducibility and inter-observer variability of the novel sequence. METHODS Eleven volunteers with no known heart condition (female: 6, mean age: 25.8 ± 9.1 years) and two patients with a Fontan circulation were examined using phase-contrast 2D and 4D flow MRI. Stroke volumes, maximum velocities, net flow curves and internal consistency were measured and compared between 2D, 4D Mono and 4D Multi. Additionally, scan-rescan and inter-observer variabilities were analyzed. Finally, qualitative visualization comparisons were performed. RESULTS Bland-Altman analysis show a higher agreement in stroke volumes between 4D Multi and 2D (7 ± 11%) than 4D Mono and 2D (11 ± 24%). 4D Multi is more accurate than 4D Mono in measuring time-resolved net flow throughout the cardiac cycle and qualitative blood flow visualization of 4D Multi is more accurate in visualizing flow patterns revealing more details and less artifacts than 4D Mono. Scan-rescan reproducibility is higher in 4D Multi (-0.04 ± 4.5 ml) than 2D (2.1 ± 7.3 ml) and inter-observer variability is low in both techniques (2D: -0.4 ± 3.4 ml and 4D Multi: 0.4 ± 3.5 ml). Internal consistency was improved in volunteers and patients when using 4D Multi as compared to 4D Mono. CONCLUSION 4D Multi offers a comprehensive way to accurately quantify flow in arteries and veins both in high and low flow situations and to visualize detailed flow patterns. This technique is readily applicable in the clinical setting and has the potential to be beneficial in the clinical assessment of valvular and congenital heart diseases.

[1]  T Ebbers,et al.  Estimation of relative cardiovascular pressures using time‐resolved three‐dimensional phase contrast MRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  S. Kozerke,et al.  Turbulent Kinetic Energy Assessed by Multipoint 4-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging Provides Additional Information Relative to Echocardiography for the Determination of Aortic Stenosis Severity , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[3]  Stuart M Grieve,et al.  Use of multi‐velocity encoding 4D flow MRI to improve quantification of flow patterns in the aorta , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Hans-Ulrich Kauczor,et al.  Validation of Magnetic Resonance Phase-Contrast Flow Measurements in the Main Pulmonary Artery and Aorta Using Perivascular Ultrasound in a Large Animal Model , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[5]  Michael Markl,et al.  Four‐dimensional flow assessment of pulmonary artery flow and wall shear stress in adult pulmonary arterial hypertension: Results from two institutions , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  D N Firmin,et al.  Magnetic resonance velocity mapping: clinical application of a new technique. , 1987, British heart journal.

[7]  Jürgen Hennig,et al.  Parallel MRI with extended and averaged GRAPPA kernels (PEAK‐GRAPPA): Optimized spatiotemporal dynamic imaging , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  N J Pelc,et al.  Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: Analysis and correction , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  O. Pahlm,et al.  Left-to-right cardiac shunts: comparison of measurements obtained with MR velocity mapping and with radionuclide angiography. , 1999, Radiology.

[10]  Einar Heiberg,et al.  Quantification and visualization of cardiovascular 4D velocity mapping accelerated with parallel imaging or k-t BLAST: head to head comparison and validation at 1.5 T and 3 T , 2011, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[11]  Titus Kuehne,et al.  Flow‐sensitive four‐dimensional cine magnetic resonance imaging for offline blood flow quantification in multiple vessels: A validation study , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  S. Caruthers,et al.  Practical Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Quantification of Aortic Valve Stenosis: Comparison With Echocardiography , 2003, Circulation.

[13]  Michael Markl,et al.  Reproducibility of flow and wall shear stress analysis using flow‐sensitive four‐dimensional MRI , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  Steffen Ringgaard,et al.  Three dimensional three component whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity mapping: comparison of flow measurements from 3D and 2D acquisitions , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[15]  Albert de Roos,et al.  Cardiovascular Function and Flow by 4-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques: New Applications , 2014, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[16]  Oliver Bieri,et al.  Peak Velocity Measurements in Tortuous Arteries With Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: The Effect of Multidirectional Velocity Encoding , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[17]  J. Hennig,et al.  Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: Optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  G. Kim,et al.  Multi‐VENC acquisition of four‐dimensional phase‐contrast MRI to improve precision of velocity field measurement , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Kevin M Johnson,et al.  Four‐dimensional phase contrast MRI with accelerated dual velocity encoding , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  M. Markl,et al.  Comprehensive 4D velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[21]  Philipp Beerbaum,et al.  Systemic-to-pulmonary collateral flow in patients with palliated univentricular heart physiology: measurement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance 4D velocity acquisition , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[22]  Steffen E. Petersen,et al.  Quantification of shunt volumes in congenital heart diseases using a breath-hold MR phase contrast technique – comparison with oximetry , 2002, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[23]  Titus Kuehne,et al.  Four‐dimensional velocity‐encoded magnetic resonance imaging improves blood flow quantification in patients with complex accelerated flow , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  Thomas M Grist,et al.  Repeatability and internal consistency of abdominal 2D and 4D phase contrast MR flow measurements. , 2013, Academic radiology.

[25]  Sebastian Kozerke,et al.  Analysis of temperature dependence of background phase errors in phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2014, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[26]  Wei Liu,et al.  Quantification of stenotic mitral valve area with magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with Doppler ultrasound. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  Raad Mohiaddin,et al.  How we perform cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow assessment using phase-contrast velocity mapping. , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[28]  T. Schaeffter,et al.  Four‐dimensional (4D) flow of the whole heart and great vessels using real‐time respiratory self‐gating , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  M. Buonocore,et al.  4D magnetic resonance velocity mapping of blood flow patterns in the aorta in young vs. elderly normal subjects , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[30]  M. Markl,et al.  4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement , 2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[31]  M. Cadioli,et al.  Mechanistic insight into the physiological relevance of helical blood flow in the human aorta: an in vivo study , 2011, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[32]  Michael Markl,et al.  Time‐resolved three‐dimensional phase‐contrast MRI , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[33]  Petter Dyverfeldt,et al.  Semi-automatic quantification of 4D left ventricular blood flow , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[34]  Michael Markl,et al.  Estimation of global aortic pulse wave velocity by flow‐sensitive 4D MRI , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  M. Markl,et al.  Comparison of 4D flow and 2D velocity-encoded phase contrast MRI sequences for the evaluation of aortic hemodynamics , 2016, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[36]  C. Meier,et al.  Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[37]  Pablo Irarrazaval,et al.  Caval blood flow distribution in patients with Fontan circulation: quantification by using particle traces from 4D flow MR imaging. , 2013, Radiology.

[38]  T. Nagayasu,et al.  Clinical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging flowmetry of portal and hepatic veins in patients following hepatectomy , 2006, Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver.

[39]  Melanie Traughber,et al.  Assessment of flow and hemodynamics in the carotid artery using a reduced TE 4D flow spiral phase-contrast MRI , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[40]  Sebastian Kozerke,et al.  Image‐based background phase error correction in 4D flow MRI revisited , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[41]  H F Li,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the severity of mitral regurgitation. Comparison with invasive techniques. , 1995, Circulation.

[42]  Michael Markl,et al.  4D flow MRI , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[43]  R. Herfkens,et al.  Phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[44]  S. Yoo,et al.  Phase‐contrast magnetic resonance quantification of normal pulmonary venous return , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[45]  Martin Buehrer,et al.  Towards highly accelerated Cartesian time-resolved 3D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the clinical setting , 2014, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[46]  S. Kozerke,et al.  Bayesian multipoint velocity encoding for concurrent flow and turbulence mapping , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.