Online Perceptions of Self and Others

The Internet has greatly expanded the ways in which we communicate and interact with others. This chapter explores how are our perceptions of others and of ourselves effected by these new ways of communicating. The first section examines the nature of computer-mediated communication (CMC) as viewed by several prominent theoretical models, exploring how these models assess possible sources of accurate and inaccurate perceptions online and the impact of perceptions in cyberspace on everyday face-to-face social relationships. Next, the chapter explores the role of relevant cognitive processes in the development of online perceptions, including the activation of stereotypes, self-confirmation of attributions, and the instantiation of social identity. The final section examines the problem of accurately knowing how others perceive oneself in cyberspace versus in face-to-face interactions. Current literature supports the general idea that perceptions are indeed influenced by the medium, but not always in straightforward ways. First, despite the apparently impoverished text -based nature of most forms of CMC, people do form impressions of each other and they do develop strong interpersonal relationships online. Second, CMC may foster perceptions that are more extreme than in face-to-face situations, but the positive or negative direction of the effect may depend on factors external to the medium itself. Finally, meta-perceptions are distorted by at least some forms of the medium such that people may be less accurate in judging how others view them than they are in face-to-face interactions.

[1]  Sue Dewine,et al.  Teleconferencing and Interpersonal Communication Perception. , 1985 .

[2]  U. Neisser Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization , 1989 .

[3]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[4]  Julian Dibbell,et al.  Taboo, Consensus, and the Challenge of Democracy in an Electronic Forum , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[5]  S. Utz Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. , 2000 .

[6]  S. Turkle Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[7]  Hugh Miller,et al.  Gender and web home pages , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[8]  A. Joinson Self‐disclosure in computer‐mediated communication: The role of self‐awareness and visual anonymity , 2001 .

[9]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[11]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[12]  Tim O'Shea,et al.  'Flaming' in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. , 1992 .

[13]  J. Walther Impression Development in Computer-Mediated Interaction. , 1993 .

[14]  Patricia Wallace The Psychology of the Internet , 1999 .

[15]  Helen Z. Margetts,et al.  Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices , 1993, J. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Lindsy Van Gelder The Strange Case of the Electronic Lover , 1991, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[17]  J. Walther Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[18]  Sharon Y. M. Chan,et al.  Wired-Selves: From Artifact to Performance , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[20]  Pavel Curtis,et al.  Mudding: Social phenomena in text-based virtual realities. , 1997 .

[21]  R. Spears,et al.  Panacea or Panopticon? , 1994 .

[22]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Technological or Social Utility? Unraveling Explanations of Email, Vmail, and Fax Use , 1993, Inf. Soc..

[23]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[24]  R. Spears,et al.  Paralanguage and social perception in computer‐mediated communication , 1992 .

[25]  G. Lakoff Cognitive models and prototype theory. , 1987 .

[26]  Russell Spears,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication, De-Individuation and Group Decision-Making , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[27]  J. David Johnson,et al.  Functional Work Groups and Evaluations of Communication Channels: Comparisons of SixCompeting Theoretical Perspectives , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[28]  Thomas Gilovich,et al.  The Spotlight Effect and the Illusion of Transparency , 1999 .

[29]  H. Miller The Presentation of Self in Electronic Life: Goffman on the Internet , 1995 .

[30]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[31]  Malcolm R. Parks Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[32]  Eleanor Wynn,et al.  Hyperbole over Cyberspace: Self-Presentation and Social Boundaries in Internet Home Pages and Discourse , 1997, Inf. Soc..

[33]  Haya Bechar-Israeli,et al.  From "Bonehead" to "cLoNehEAd": Nicknames, Play and Identity on Internet Relay Chat , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  David Jacobson,et al.  Impression Formation in Cyberspace: Online Expectations and Offline Experiences in Text-based Virtual Communities , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[35]  J. Walther Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[36]  C. Basaran Preface , 1934, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[37]  W. Swann,et al.  Hypothesis-Testing Processes in Social Interaction , 1978 .

[38]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Information and Communication: Alternative Uses of the Internet in Households , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Do people know how others view them? An empirical and theoretical account. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[41]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .