Low-frequency cortical responses to natural speech reflect probabilistic phonotactics
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Matthew K. Leonard,et al. The influence of lexical statistics on temporal lobe cortical dynamics during spoken word listening , 2015, Brain and Language.
[2] T. A. Cartwright,et al. Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation , 1996, Cognition.
[3] Kyle Gorman,et al. Prosodylab-aligner: A tool for forced alignment of laboratory speech , 2011 .
[4] H. Storkel,et al. Learning new words: phonotactic probability in language development. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[5] John J. Foxe,et al. Attentional Selection in a Cocktail Party Environment Can Be Decoded from Single-Trial EEG. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.
[6] David B Pisoni,et al. Perception of Wordlikeness: Effects of Segment Probability and Length on the Processing of Nonwords. , 2000, Journal of memory and language.
[7] D. Poeppel,et al. Cortical Tracking of Hierarchical Linguistic Structures in Connected Speech , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.
[8] Arnaud Delorme,et al. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[9] Edmund C. Lalor,et al. Causal cortical dynamics of a predictive enhancement of speech intelligibility , 2018, NeuroImage.
[10] James L. McClelland,et al. The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.
[11] Virginie van Wassenhove,et al. Distinct contributions of low- and high-frequency neural oscillations to speech comprehension , 2017 .
[12] Erich Schröger,et al. Filter Effects and Filter Artifacts in the Analysis of Electrophysiological Data , 2012, Front. Psychology.
[13] Mark Johnson,et al. Learning OT constraint rankings using a maximum entropy model , 2003 .
[14] A. Marantz,et al. The time course of contextual cohort effects in auditory processing of category-ambiguous words: MEG evidence for a single “clash” as noun or verb , 2018 .
[15] Rufin VanRullen,et al. Four Common Conceptual Fallacies in Mapping the Time Course of Recognition , 2011, Front. Psychology.
[16] L. Pylkkänen,et al. Neuromagnetic Evidence for the Timing of Lexical Activation: An MEG Component Sensitive to Phonotactic Probability but Not to Neighborhood Density , 2002, Brain and Language.
[17] H. Hotelling. Relations Between Two Sets of Variates , 1936 .
[18] D. Pisoni,et al. Phonotactics, Neighborhood Activation, and Lexical Access for Spoken Words , 1999, Brain and Language.
[19] Michael Hammond,et al. Gradience, Phonotactics and the Lexicon in English Phonology , 2004 .
[20] Lisa Davidson,et al. Phonology, phonetics, or frequency: Influences on the production of non-native sequences , 2006, J. Phonetics.
[21] J. Simon,et al. Cortical entrainment to continuous speech: functional roles and interpretations , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[22] Todd M. Bailey,et al. Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? , 2001 .
[23] Noam Chomsky,et al. The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .
[24] Angela D. Friederici,et al. Phonotactic Knowledge and Lexical-Semantic Processing in One-year-olds: Brain Responses to Words and Nonsense Words in Picture Contexts , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[25] J. Segui,et al. Phonological mediation in visual masked priming: evidence from phonotactic repair. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[26] J. Mehler,et al. New evidence for prelexical phonological processing in word recognition , 2001 .
[27] Walter Ritter,et al. Repetition and semantic priming of nonwords: implications for theories of N400 and word recognition. , 2004, Psychophysiology.
[28] Emmanuel Dupoux,et al. Where Do Illusory Vowels Come from , 2011 .
[29] J. Connolly,et al. Event-Related Potential Components Reflect Phonological and Semantic Processing of the Terminal Word of Spoken Sentences , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[30] David Poeppel,et al. Characterizing Neural Entrainment to Hierarchical Linguistic Units using Electroencephalography (EEG) , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[31] Edmund C. Lalor,et al. Low-Frequency Cortical Entrainment to Speech Reflects Phoneme-Level Processing , 2015, Current Biology.
[32] D. D. Greenwood,et al. Auditory Masking and the Critical Band , 1961 .
[33] Tania S. Zamuner,et al. Phonotactics and Syllable Structure in Infant Speech Perception , 2016 .
[34] P. Jusczyk,et al. Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. , 1994 .
[35] Tomas O Lentz,et al. Categorical phonotactic knowledge filters second language input, but probabilistic phonotactic knowledge can still be acquired , 2015, Language and speech.
[36] Emmanuel Dupoux,et al. Electrophysiological Correlates of Phonological Processing: A Cross-linguistic Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[37] Lisa Davidson. Phonetic, phonemic, and phonological factors in cross-language discrimination of phonotactic contrasts. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[38] D. Munz. Psychotherapie in der Psychiatrie: Ein Blick aus Sicht der Bundespsychotherapeutenkammer , 2017 .
[39] P. Jusczyk,et al. Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants , 2001, Cognition.
[40] Jan Wouters,et al. Speech Intelligibility Predicted from Neural Entrainment of the Speech Envelope , 2018, bioRxiv.
[41] Stephen G. Parker. The sonority controversy , 2012 .
[42] H. Storkel,et al. Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning. , 2006, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[43] Hellmuth Obrig,et al. Electrophysiological evidence for modulation of lexical processing after repetitive exposure to foreign phonotactic rules , 2013, Brain and Language.
[44] D. Pisoni,et al. The Handbook of Speech Perception , 2004 .
[45] Holly L Storkel,et al. The Lexicon and Phonology: Interactions in Language Acquisition. , 2002, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.
[46] Edmund C Lalor,et al. Cortical Measures of Phoneme-Level Speech Encoding Correlate with the Perceived Clarity of Natural Speech , 2018, eNeuro.
[47] Edmund C. Lalor,et al. Electrophysiological Correlates of Semantic Dissimilarity Reflect the Comprehension of Natural, Narrative Speech , 2017, Current Biology.
[48] James White,et al. Disentangling phonological well-formedness and attestedness: An ERP study of onset clusters in English , 2017 .
[49] Barak A. Pearlmutter,et al. The VESPA: A method for the rapid estimation of a visual evoked potential , 2006, NeuroImage.
[50] Daniel D.E. Wong,et al. Multiway Canonical Correlation Analysis of Brain Signals , 2018, bioRxiv.
[51] D. Kemmerer,et al. Phonotactics and Syllable Stress: Implications for the Processing of Spoken Nonsense Words , 1997, Language and speech.
[52] J. Mehler,et al. Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? , 1999, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
[53] M. Schlesewsky,et al. Event-related Potentials Reflecting the Processing of Phonological Constraint Violations , 2009, Language and speech.
[54] Bruce Hayes,et al. A Maximum Entropy Model of Phonotactics and Phonotactic Learning , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.
[55] Lisa Davidson,et al. Phonotactics and Articulatory Coordination Interact in Phonology: Evidence from Nonnative Production , 2006, Cogn. Sci..
[56] S. Luck. An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique , 2005 .
[57] Edmund C. Lalor,et al. The Multivariate Temporal Response Function (mTRF) Toolbox: A MATLAB Toolbox for Relating Neural Signals to Continuous Stimuli , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[58] Matthew K. Leonard,et al. Perceptual restoration of masked speech in human cortex , 2016, Nature Communications.
[59] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.
[60] N. Sebastián-Gallés. Biased to learn language. , 2007, Developmental science.
[61] Denis Burnham,et al. Atypical cortical entrainment to speech in the right hemisphere underpins phonemic deficits in dyslexia , 2018, NeuroImage.
[62] Björn Herrmann,et al. Neural Oscillations in Speech: Don't be Enslaved by the Envelope , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[63] P. Jusczyk,et al. Phonotactic and Prosodic Effects on Word Segmentation in Infants , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.
[64] Kenneth Ward Church,et al. Phonological parsing and lexical retrieval , 1987, Cognition.
[65] Tal Linzen,et al. The role of morphology in phoneme prediction: Evidence from MEG , 2014, Brain and Language.
[66] Holly L Storkel,et al. The emerging lexicon of children with phonological delays: phonotactic constraints and probability in acquisition. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[67] Laura Winther Balling,et al. Probability and surprisal in auditory comprehension of morphologically complex words , 2012, Cognition.
[68] Matthew K. Leonard,et al. Dynamic Encoding of Speech Sequence Probability in Human Temporal Cortex , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[69] Keith Johnson,et al. Phonetic Feature Encoding in Human Superior Temporal Gyrus , 2014, Science.
[70] J. McQueen. Segmentation of Continuous Speech Using Phonotactics , 1998 .
[71] Matthew T. Carlson,et al. Navigating conflicting phonotactic constraints in bilingual speech perception , 2016 .
[72] Mónica A. Wagner,et al. The phonotactic influence on the perception of a consonant cluster /pt/ by native English and native Polish listeners: A behavioral and event related potential (ERP) study , 2012, Brain and Language.
[73] L. Elliot Hong,et al. Transformation from auditory to linguistic representations across auditory cortex is rapid and attention dependent for continuous speech , 2018, bioRxiv.
[74] Isabell Wartenburger,et al. Implicit Processing of Phonotactic Cues: Evidence from Electrophysiological and Vascular Responses , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[75] Marian Grendár,et al. Maximum Entropy: Clearing up Mysteries , 2001, Entropy.
[76] Lori L. Holt,et al. Are there interactive processes in speech perception? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[77] Hellmuth Obrig,et al. Universal and language-specific sublexical cues in speech perception: a novel electroencephalography-lesion approach. , 2016, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[78] Wolfgang Senf,et al. Psychotherapie in der Psychiatrie , 2005 .
[79] R. Harald Baayen,et al. Morphological effects in auditory word recognition: Evidence from Danish , 2008 .
[80] Alain de Cheveigné,et al. Decoding the auditory brain with canonical component analysis , 2017, NeuroImage.
[81] John J. Foxe,et al. Resolving precise temporal processing properties of the auditory system using continuous stimuli. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.
[82] J. Simon,et al. Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.
[83] Mary R. Newsome,et al. The Beginnings of Word Segmentation in English-Learning Infants , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.
[84] Edmund C. Lalor,et al. Indexing cortical entrainment to natural speech at the phonemic level: Methodological considerations for applied research , 2017, Hearing Research.
[85] Alec Marantz,et al. A neural response sensitive to repetition and phonotactic probability: MEG investigations of lexical access , 2000 .
[86] N. Mesgarani,et al. Dynamic Encoding of Acoustic Features in Neural Responses to Continuous Speech , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.