Local and remote mean and extreme temperature response to regional aerosol emissions reductions

Abstract. The climatic implications of regional aerosol and precursor emissions reductions implemented to protect human health are poorly understood. We investigate the mean and extreme temperature response to regional changes in aerosol emissions using three coupled chemistry–climate models: NOAA GFDL CM3, NCAR CESM1, and NASA GISS-E2. Our approach contrasts a long present-day control simulation from each model (up to 400 years with perpetual year 2000 or 2005 emissions) with 14 individual aerosol emissions perturbation simulations (160–240 years each). We perturb emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and/or carbonaceous aerosol within six world regions and assess the statistical significance of mean and extreme temperature responses relative to internal variability determined by the control simulation and across the models. In all models, the global mean surface temperature response (perturbation minus control) to SO2 and/or carbonaceous aerosol is mostly positive (warming) and statistically significant and ranges from +0.17 K (Europe SO2) to −0.06 K (US BC). The warming response to SO2 reductions is strongest in the US and Europe perturbation simulations, both globally and regionally, with Arctic warming up to 1 K due to a removal of European anthropogenic SO2 emissions alone; however, even emissions from regions remote to the Arctic, such as SO2 from India, significantly warm the Arctic by up to 0.5 K. Arctic warming is the most robust response across each model and several aerosol emissions perturbations. The temperature response in the Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes is most sensitive to emissions perturbations within that region. In the tropics, however, the temperature response to emissions perturbations is roughly the same in magnitude as emissions perturbations either within or outside of the tropics. We find that climate sensitivity to regional aerosol perturbations ranges from 0.5 to 1.0 K (W m−2)−1 depending on the region and aerosol composition and is larger than the climate sensitivity to a doubling of CO2 in two of three models. We update previous estimates of regional temperature potential (RTP), a metric for estimating the regional temperature responses to a regional emissions perturbation that can facilitate assessment of climate impacts with integrated assessment models without requiring computationally demanding coupled climate model simulations. These calculations indicate a robust regional response to aerosol forcing within the Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes, regardless of where the aerosol forcing is located longitudinally. We show that regional aerosol perturbations can significantly increase extreme temperatures on the regional scale. Except in the Arctic in the summer, extreme temperature responses largely mirror mean temperature responses to regional aerosol perturbations through a shift of the temperature distributions and are mostly dominated by local rather than remote aerosol forcing.

[1]  B. Samset,et al.  Emerging Asian aerosol patterns , 2019, Nature Geoscience.

[2]  Christopher J. Smith,et al.  Arctic Amplification Response to Individual Climate Drivers , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[3]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Observationally constrained aerosol–cloud semi-direct effects , 2019, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science.

[4]  D. Stevenson,et al.  Strong Influence of Aerosol Reductions on Future Heatwaves , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[5]  Thomas Jung,et al.  The Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP) contribution to CMIP6: investigating the causes and consequences of polar amplification , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.

[6]  T. Andrews,et al.  Understanding Rapid Adjustments to Diverse Forcing Agents , 2018, Geophysical research letters.

[7]  K. Caldeira,et al.  Divergent global-scale temperature effects from identical aerosols emitted in different regions , 2018, Nature Communications.

[8]  H. Hansson,et al.  Local and remote temperature response of regional SO2 emissions , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[9]  A. Voulgarakis,et al.  Similar spatial patterns of global climate response to aerosols from different regions , 2018, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science.

[10]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Connecting regional aerosol emissions reductions to local and remote precipitation responses , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[11]  J. Lamarque,et al.  A PDRMIP multi-model study on the impacts of regional aerosol forcings on global and regional precipitation. , 2018, Journal of climate.

[12]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Multimodel Surface Temperature Responses to Removal of U.S. Sulfur Dioxide Emissions , 2018 .

[13]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Land radiative management as contributor to regional-scale climate adaptation and mitigation , 2018, Nature Geoscience.

[14]  P. Cox,et al.  Emergent constraint on equilibrium climate sensitivity from global temperature variability , 2018, Nature.

[15]  P. Forster,et al.  Climate Impacts From a Removal of Anthropogenic Aerosol Emissions , 2018, Geophysical research letters.

[16]  T. Andrews,et al.  Rapid Adjustments Cause Weak Surface Temperature Response to Increased Black Carbon Concentrations , 2017, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[17]  S. Carn,et al.  India Is Overtaking China as the World’s Largest Emitter of Anthropogenic Sulfur Dioxide , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[18]  G. Hegerl,et al.  Beyond equilibrium climate sensitivity , 2017 .

[19]  Tânia Fontes,et al.  Trends of PM2.5 concentrations in China: A long term approach. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Multimodel precipitation responses to removal of U.S. sulfur dioxide emissions , 2017, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[21]  D. S. Wilks,et al.  “The Stippling Shows Statistically Significant Grid Points”: How Research Results are Routinely Overstated and Overinterpreted, and What to Do about It , 2016 .

[22]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Regional and global temperature response to anthropogenic SO2 emissions from China in three climate models , 2016 .

[23]  R. Horton,et al.  A Review of Recent Advances in Research on Extreme Heat Events , 2016, Current Climate Change Reports.

[24]  A. Fiore,et al.  Temperature and Precipitation Extremes in the United States: Quantifying the Responses to Anthropogenic Aerosols and Greenhouse Gases,+ , 2016 .

[25]  D. Dixon,et al.  The Amundsen Sea Low: Variability, Change, and Impact on Antarctic Climate , 2016 .

[26]  G. Schmidt,et al.  Implications for climate sensitivity from the response to individual forcings , 2016 .

[27]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Radiative forcing and climate response to projected 21st century aerosol decreases , 2015 .

[28]  Reto Knutti,et al.  Feedbacks, climate sensitivity and the limits of linear models , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[29]  R. Allen A 21st century northward tropical precipitation shift caused by future anthropogenic aerosol reductions , 2015 .

[30]  S. Ghan,et al.  Using an explicit emission tagging method in global modeling of source‐receptor relationships for black carbon in the Arctic: Variations, sources, and transport pathways , 2014 .

[31]  D. Shindell Inhomogeneous forcing and transient climate sensitivity , 2014 .

[32]  R. Knutti,et al.  Estimating climate sensitivity and future temperature in the presence of natural climate variability , 2014 .

[33]  William M. Putman,et al.  Configuration and assessment of the GISS ModelE2 contributions to the CMIP5 archive , 2014 .

[34]  D. Shindell,et al.  Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing , 2014 .

[35]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Impact of preindustrial to present‐day changes in short‐lived pollutant emissions on atmospheric composition and climate forcing , 2013 .

[36]  N. Gillett,et al.  The role of reduced aerosol precursor emissions in driving near-term warming , 2013 .

[37]  B. DeAngelo,et al.  Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment , 2013 .

[38]  Reto Knutti,et al.  Energy budget constraints on climate response , 2013 .

[39]  Jean-Christophe Golaz,et al.  The roles of aerosol direct and indirect effects in past and future climate change , 2013 .

[40]  D. Murphy Little net clear-sky radiative forcing from recent regional redistribution of aerosols , 2013 .

[41]  F. Zwiers,et al.  Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate , 2013 .

[42]  D. Shindell Evaluation of the absolute regional temperature potential , 2012 .

[43]  Wenche Aas,et al.  Introduction to the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and observed atmospheric composition change during 1972–2009 , 2012 .

[44]  T. Stocker,et al.  Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2012 .

[45]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Sulfur dioxide and primary carbonaceous aerosol emissions in China and India, 1996-2010 , 2011 .

[46]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate sensitivity in the Anthropocene , 2011 .

[47]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Climatic effects of 1950–2050 changes in US anthropogenic aerosols – Part 1: Aerosol trends and radiative forcing , 2011 .

[48]  Ramaswamy,et al.  The dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component AM3 of the GFDL global coupled model CM3 , 2011 .

[49]  Drew T. Shindell,et al.  Climate response to regional radiative forcing during the twentieth century , 2009 .

[50]  Reto Knutti,et al.  The equilibrium sensitivity of the Earth's temperature to radiation changes , 2008 .

[51]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon , 2008 .

[52]  G. S. Callendar The artificial production of carbon dioxide and its influence on temperature , 2007 .

[53]  S. Solomon The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[54]  J. Hansen,et al.  Efficacy of climate forcings , 2005 .

[55]  Meinrat O. Andreae,et al.  Strong present-day aerosol cooling implies a hot future , 2005, Nature.

[56]  Hans von Storch,et al.  Taking Serial Correlation into Account in Tests of the Mean. , 1995 .

[57]  B. Albrecht Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness , 1989, Science.

[58]  S. Arrhenius “On the Infl uence of Carbonic Acid in the Air upon the Temperature of the Ground” (1896) , 2017, The Future of Nature.