Deformable registration of CT and cone-beam CT by local CBCT intensity correction

In this paper, we propose a method to accurately register CT to cone-beam CT (CBCT) by iteratively correcting local CBCT intensity. CBCT is a widely used intra-operative imaging modality in image-guided radiotherapy and surgery. A short scan followed by a filtered-backprojection is typically used for CBCT reconstruction. While data on the mid-plane (plane of source-detector rotation) is complete, off-mid-planes undergo different information deficiency and the computed reconstructions are approximate. This causes different reconstruction artifacts at off-mid-planes depending on slice locations, and therefore impedes accurate registration between CT and CBCT. To address this issue, we correct CBCT intensities by matching local intensity histograms slice by slice in conjunction with intensity-based deformable registration. This correction-registration step is repeated until the result image converges. We tested the proposed method on eight head-and-neck cancer cases and compared its performance with state-of-the-art registration methods, Bspline, demons, and optical flow, which are widely used for CT-CBCT registration. Normalized mutual-information (NMI), normalized cross-correlation (NCC), and structural similarity (SSIM) were computed as similarity measures for the performance evaluation. Our method produced overall NMI of 0.59, NCC of 0.96, and SSIM of 0.93, outperforming existing methods by 3.6%, 2.4%, and 2.8% in terms of NMI, NCC, and SSIM scores, respectively. Experimental results show that our method is more consistent and roust than existing algorithms, and also computationally efficient with faster convergence.

[1]  Nikos Paragios,et al.  Deformable Medical Image Registration: A Survey , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Linghong Zhou,et al.  CT to cone-beam CT deformable registration with simultaneous intensity correction , 2012, Medical physics.

[3]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  Evaluation of sparse-view reconstruction from flat-panel-detector cone-beam CT , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Sebastian Schafer,et al.  Demons deformable registration of CT and cone-beam CT using an iterative intensity matching approach. , 2011, Medical physics.

[5]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Hybrid Cone-Beam Tomographic Reconstruction: Incorporation of Prior Anatomical Models to Compensate for Missing Data , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Xun Jia,et al.  Joint CT/CBCT deformable registration and CBCT enhancement for cancer radiotherapy , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Kari Tanderup,et al.  Acceleration and validation of optical flow based deformable registration for image-guided radiotherapy , 2008, Acta oncologica.

[10]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Digital image processing, 3rd Edition , 2008 .

[11]  Mariana Guerrero,et al.  Deformable planning CT to cone-beam CT image registration in head-and-neck cancer. , 2011, Medical physics.

[12]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Determining Optical Flow , 1981, Other Conferences.

[13]  Yoshito Otake,et al.  Volume-of-change cone-beam CT for image-guided surgery , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.