Incidence of loss of consciousness during automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks.

OBJECTIVE To determine the incidence of loss of consciousness occurring in association with shocks delivered by automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (AICD) in patients who had undergone implantation as treatment for ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. DESIGN Cohort study. SETTING Two major tertiary medical care facilities. PATIENTS A total of 180 patients who had undergone implantation of an AICD for treatment of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. INTERVENTION Implantation of an AICD that delivered only high-energy shock. MEASUREMENTS During a mean (+/- SD) follow-up period of 16 +/- 12 months, the incidence of loss of consciousness occurring in association with spontaneous AICD shocks was determined. Various clinical factors were analyzed to identify predictors of loss of consciousness that occurred during AICD shocks. MAIN RESULTS Of the 180 patients who received an AICD, 106 patients (59%) experienced AICD shocks during follow-up. Sixteen of the 180 patients (9%) experienced loss of consciousness; 13 of these 16 patients had syncope and 3 died suddenly, in association with AICD shocks. The absence of syncope during one AICD shock did not always predict the absence of syncope during subsequent shocks. Syncope could not be predicted by age, sex, history of syncope, left ventricular function, type of underlying heart disease, electrophysiologic findings, rate of ventricular tachycardia, antiarrhythmic medications, and type of pulse generator implanted. CONCLUSIONS Patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation who receive an AICD that delivers only high-energy shock therapy are at moderate risk for experiencing loss of consciousness during AICD shocks. No clinical variables were found to be predictors of syncope. Therefore, driving and other activities that require patients to be extra vigilant should not be assumed to be safe after implantation of an AICD that delivers only high-energy shock.

[1]  P E Oyer,et al.  Clinical experience, complications, and survival in 70 patients with the automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator. , 1985, Circulation.

[2]  S. Broste,et al.  The effect of epilepsy or diabetes mellitus on the risk of automobile accidents. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  J. Steinberg,et al.  Cardiac rhythm precipitating automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge in outpatients as detected from transtelephonic electrocardiographic recordings. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  J. Ruskin,et al.  The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: efficacy, complications and survival in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  P. Tchou,et al.  Reemployment following implantation of the automatic cardioverter defibrillator. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  C. Schuger,et al.  The automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator as antiarrhythmic treatment modality of choice for survivors of cardiac arrest unrelated to acute myocardial infarction. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  J. A. Waller Chronic medical conditions and traffic safety: review of the California experience. , 1965, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  L. Ysander The Safety of Drivers with Chronic Disease , 1966, British journal of industrial medicine.

[9]  A. Crancer,et al.  Accident and Violation Rates of Washington's Medically Restricted Drivers , 1968 .