Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Presence of the maxillary sinus or the mental foramen may prevent implant treatment in the posterior maxilla or mandible. Tilting of distal implants supporting fixed restorations may be a valid treatment alternative. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate if tilting of splinted implants affects stress distribution in the bone surrounding the implant cervix, and to investigate if the use of tilted implants as distal abutments is biomechanically superior to the use of distal cantilevers. MATERIAL AND METHODS A 2-dimensional (2-D) model for finite element analysis was developed using two 13-mm implants splinted by a titanium beam, 16 x 3 mm. The implants were embedded in bone blocks, simulating different bone properties. A small crater was created in the marginal bone around the tilted implant to simulate physiologic bone remodeling. The model with a distal cantilever 7 mm long and a distal implant was compared to a model in which the distal implant (13 or 19 mm) was tilted 45 degrees and supported the distal end of the cantilever. A force of 50 N was applied via the beam. RESULTS The stress at the most coronal bone-to-implant contact was identical irrespective of the angle of tilt, demonstrating that tilting of splinted implants does not result in increased stress. The cantilevered model showed that the use of cantilevers results in higher stress in the marginal bone around implants. This stress is reduced to "normal" levels when the cantilever arm is negated by the distal implant being apically inclined to support the distal end of the cantilever. Use of a longer implant only reduces the stress marginally. CONCLUSIONS Within the limitations of this 2-D finite element analysis, it appears that distal tilting of implants splinted by fixed restorations does not increase bone stress compared to normally placed, vertical implants. There is a biomechanical advantage in using tilted distal implants rather than distal cantilever units.

[1]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Bone healing around implants placed in a jaw defect augmented with Bio-Oss. An experimental study in dogs. , 2000, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[2]  P. Branemark,et al.  Long-term follow-up of severely atrophic edentulous mandibles reconstructed with short Brånemark implants. , 2000, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[3]  R L Sakaguchi,et al.  Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws. , 1995, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[4]  R Huiskes,et al.  Mathematical shape optimization of hip prosthesis design. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Y. Maeda,et al.  Biomechanical rationale for intentionally inclined implants in the posterior mandible using 3D finite element analysis. , 2005, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[6]  A. Hugoson,et al.  Long-term prognosis of extensive polyunit cantilevered fixed partial dentures. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  S. Berrone,et al.  Vertical alveolar ridge augmentation by means of a titanium mesh and autogenous bone grafts. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[8]  B. Le,et al.  Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation: Review of Anatomy and Two Techniques , 2004, Implant dentistry.

[9]  G Van der Perre,et al.  The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  B Rangert,et al.  Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[11]  N. Horie,et al.  Ridge Widening and Immediate Implant Placement: A Case Report , 2001, Implant dentistry.

[12]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  O. Miyakawa,et al.  Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant--a three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2005, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[14]  D Siegele,et al.  Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[15]  Bjarni E Pjetursson,et al.  A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[16]  Lars Sennerby,et al.  One-year prospective three-center study comparing the outcome of a "soft bone implant" (prototype Mk IV) and the standard Brånemark implant. , 2003, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[17]  F. Renouard,et al.  Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. , 2005, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[18]  Arturo N Natali,et al.  Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach. , 2006, Clinical oral implants research.

[19]  Michel Barquins,et al.  Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. , 2003, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[20]  J. Nyengaard,et al.  Deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss) and bioactive glass (Biogran) arrest bone formation when used as an adjunct to guided tissue regeneration (GTR): an experimental study in the rat. , 2003, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[21]  O. Miyakawa,et al.  Peri-implant stress analysis in simulation models with or without trabecular bone structure. , 2006, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[22]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  Finite element analysis of the influence of implant inclination, loading position, and load direction on stress distribution , 2003, Odontology.

[23]  B. Rangert,et al.  Tilted implants as an alternative to maxillary sinus grafting: a clinical, radiologic, and periotest study. , 2001, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[24]  Nikolaos Donos,et al.  Comparison of implant survival following sinus floor augmentation procedures with implants placed in pristine posterior maxillary bone: a systematic review , 2004 .

[25]  H Bergmann,et al.  Placement of Endosteal Implants in the Zygoma after Maxillectomy: A Cadaver Study Using Surgical Navigation , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[26]  Miguel Nobre,et al.  All-on-4 immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous maxillae: a 1-year retrospective clinical study. , 2005, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[27]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[28]  M. Pogrel,et al.  Maxillary sinus complications related to endosseous implants. , 1995, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[29]  Roberto Calandriello,et al.  Simplified treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla via immediate/early function and tilted implants: A prospective 1-year clinical study. , 2005, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[30]  I Naert,et al.  The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[31]  M Viceconti,et al.  An FEA-based protocol for the pre-clinical validation of custom-made hip implants. , 1998, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[32]  D. Cochran,et al.  Lateral ridge augmentation using different bone fillers and barrier membrane application. A histologic and histomorphometric pilot study in the canine mandible. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[33]  James Laney Williams,et al.  Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[34]  A. Varol,et al.  Alternative bone expansion technique for immediate placement of implants in the edentulous posterior mandibular ridge: a clinical report. , 2004, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.