Optimized combinations of bortezomib, camptothecin, and doxorubicin show increased efficacy and reduced toxicity in treating oral cancer

Oral cancer continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Treatment of oral cancer with combinatorial drugs is increasingly being performed as drugs with different molecular targets often exert synergistic effects, thereby enhancing treatment efficacy. Current combinatorial drug regimens often combine the tolerable dosages of individual drugs. However, the optimized ratio of a drug combination and sequence of drug administration could contribute toward the synergy, leading to increased efficacy and reduced dosages. This report aims to study the possible synergistic effects of three anticancer drugs, a proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, Camptothecin, and a DNA intercalation drug, Doxorubicin, when used in combination for treating oral cancer. To rapidly optimize the three-drug regimen with minimal experimental efforts, a Feedback System Control optimization technique, a recent platform technique developed particularly for drug combination screening, was applied. The optimized regimen showed a therapeutic window (death rate difference between cancer cells and normal cells) close to 100%. This is the first report on the use of a combination of bortezomib, Camptothecin, and Doxorubicin in the treatment of oral cancer. Our results indicate that to have the most synergistic anticancer effect, the drugs in the optimized regimen should be dosage specific and ratio specific. Furthermore, the sequence of drug administration plays a vital role in ensuring that the combination is effective. The optimized regimen reported here has the potential to considerably increase the cure rate of oral cancer and reduce the toxicity of chemotherapy.

[1]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[2]  I. Judson,et al.  First demonstration of anti-lymphoma activity of BCL-2 antisense molecule-G3139; Results of phase I/IIA clinical trial , 1997 .

[3]  L. Dick,et al.  Building on bortezomib: second-generation proteasome inhibitors as anti-cancer therapy. , 2010, Drug discovery today.

[4]  Di Chen,et al.  Bortezomib as the first proteasome inhibitor anticancer drug: current status and future perspectives. , 2011, Current cancer drug targets.

[5]  D. Gewirtz,et al.  Interference by doxorubicin with DNA unwinding in MCF-7 breast tumor cells. , 1994, Molecular pharmacology.

[6]  P. Loehrer,et al.  Drugs five years later. Cisplatin. , 1984, Annals of internal medicine.

[7]  R. Reifen,et al.  Oral Cancer Cells Differ From Normal Oral Epithelial Cells in Tissuelike Organization and in Response to Lycopene Treatment: An Organotypic Cell Culture Study , 2003, Nutrition and cancer.

[8]  Chih-Ming Ho,et al.  Optimizing Combinations of Flavonoids Deriving from Astragali Radix in Activating the Regulatory Element of Erythropoietin by a Feedback System Control Scheme , 2013, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.

[9]  K. Conklin Dietary Antioxidants During Cancer Chemotherapy: Impact on Chemotherapeutic Effectiveness and Development of Side Effects , 2000, Nutrition and cancer.

[10]  E. Sausville,et al.  Proteasome inhibitors: a novel class of potent and effective antitumor agents. , 1999, Cancer research.

[11]  Chih-Ming Ho,et al.  Cascade search for HSV-1 combinatorial drugs with high antiviral efficacy and low toxicity , 2012, International journal of nanomedicine.

[12]  T. Szekeres,et al.  Cytotoxic effects of a doxorubicin-transferrin conjugate in multidrug-resistant KB cells. , 1996, Biochemical pharmacology.

[13]  Chih-Ming Ho,et al.  An optimized small molecule inhibitor cocktail supports long-term maintenance of human embryonic stem cells. , 2011, Nature communications.

[14]  Ting-Chao Chou,et al.  Theoretical Basis, Experimental Design, and Computerized Simulation of Synergism and Antagonism in Drug Combination Studies , 2006, Pharmacological Reviews.

[15]  L. Tauc,et al.  Nongenomic effects of cisplatin: acute inhibition of mechanosensitive transporters and channels without actin remodeling. , 2010, Cancer research.

[16]  H. M. Geller,et al.  Induction of neuronal apoptosis by camptothecin, an inhibitor of DNA topoisomerase-I: evidence for cell cycle-independent toxicity , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  S B Kaye,et al.  On the receiving end--patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapy. , 1983, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[18]  K. Uzawa,et al.  Establishment and characterization of a cisplatin-resistant cell line, KB-R, derived from oral carcinoma cell line, KB. , 2007, International journal of oncology.

[19]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics , 2011 .

[20]  C. Gwede,et al.  Mucositis incidence, severity and associated outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: a systematic literature review. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  S. Wasi,et al.  Sensitivity to camptothecin of human breast carcinoma and normal endothelial cells , 1997, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[22]  T. Hickish,et al.  Randomized trial comparing epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced esophagogastric cancer. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Chih-Ming Ho,et al.  System control-mediated drug delivery towards complex systems via nanodiamond carriers , 2010 .

[24]  L. Liu,et al.  DNA topoisomerase I-mediated DNA cleavage and cytotoxicity of camptothecin analogues. , 1989, Cancer research.

[25]  Xianting Ding,et al.  Guiding the osteogenic fate of mouse and human mesenchymal stem cells through feedback system control , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Lance Stewart,et al.  The mechanism of topoisomerase I poisoning by a camptothecin analog , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  E. Ehler,et al.  Human foetal lung (IMR-90) cells: myofibroblasts with smooth muscle-like contractile properties. , 1996, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[28]  J. Feliu,et al.  Cardiac toxicity: old and new issues in anti-cancer drugs , 2008, Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico.