Where are the Concepts in the Folksonomy Model

Corporate portals make an important integral part of the enterprise infrastructure, facilitating the creation, sharing, discovery and consumption of enterprise assets through blogs, news, forums, documents and information in general. However, as the amount of data grows, it becomes much more difficult to access the right asset in the precise moment when it is needed. Annotation systems tried to address this problem to a certain extent by allowing the users to collaboratively annotate assets using tags such that these assets can be found more easily by reusing these tags in queries. However, this model often falls short due to mismatches in the vocabularies of different users, due to the use of synonymous, polysemous, more specific or general terms in tagging and searching, and so on. In this paper we: (a) provide an analysis of the corporate portal of the Telefonica group; (b) identify requirements for a semantics-enabled annotation system that is capable of addressing the above-mentioned shortcomings; (c) define a semantic annotation model that meets the requirements; (d) provide the details of the implementation of the annotation model for the Telefonica portal; and (e) provide an initial evaluation from the use of the semantic annotation system in the enterprise.

[1]  Michael Uschold,et al.  Ontologies and semantics for seamless connectivity , 2004, SGMD.

[2]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Lightweight Ontologies , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[3]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Concept Search , 2009, ESWC.

[4]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Review of the state of the art: discovering and associating semantics to tags in folksonomies , 2012, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[5]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[6]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Social tagging: Semantics are actually used , 2008 .

[7]  C. Bauckhage,et al.  Analyzing Social Bookmarking Systems : A del . icio . us Cookbook , 2008 .

[8]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Lightweight Parsing of Classifications into Lightweight Ontologies , 2010, ECDL.

[9]  Rui Xu,et al.  Survey of clustering algorithms , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[10]  John G. Breslin,et al.  Representing and sharing folksonomies with semantics , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[11]  Peter Mika Ontologies Are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics , 2005, International Semantic Web Conference.

[12]  Ling Liu,et al.  Encyclopedia of Database Systems , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[13]  Markus Strohmaier,et al.  A call for social tagging datasets , 2010, LINK.

[14]  Alistair Miles,et al.  SKOS: Simple Knowledge Organisation for the Web , 2007 .

[15]  John G. Breslin,et al.  The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies , 2008, Dublin Core Conference.

[16]  Paul Buitelaar,et al.  Towards Linguistically Grounded Ontologies , 2009, ESWC.

[17]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems , 2005, ArXiv.

[18]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications , 2003, Description Logic Handbook.