Toward inclusive science education: University scientists' views of students,instructional practices, and the nature of science

This study examined the perceptions and self-reported practices of 18 scientists participating in a yearlong seminar series designed to explore issues of gender and ethnicity in science. Scientists and seminar were part of the Promoting Women and Scientific Literacy project, a curriculum transformation and professional development initiative undertaken by science, science education, and women's studies faculty at their university. Researchers treated participating scientists as critical friends able to bring clarity to and raise questions about conceptions of inclusion in science education. Through questionnaires and semistructured interviews, we explored their (a) rationales for differential student success in undergraduate science education; (b) self-reports of ways they structure, teach, and assess courses to promote inclusion; and (c) views of androcentric and ethnocentric bias in science. Statistical analysis of questionnaires yielded few differences in scientists' views and reported practices by sex or across time. Qualitative analysis of interviews offered insight into how scientists can help address the problem of women and ethnic minorities in science education; constraints encountered in attempts to implement pedagogical and curricular innovations; and areas of consensus and debate across scientists and science studies scholars' descriptions of science. From our findings, we provided recommendations for other professional developers working with scientists to promote excellence and equity in undergraduate science education. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Sci Ed86:42–78, 2001.

[1]  G. Vaillant Lives of Promise: What Becomes of High School Valedictorians. , 1998 .

[2]  L. Schiebinger Creating Sustainable Science , 1997, Osiris.

[3]  Margaret W. Rossiter,et al.  Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940 , 1983 .

[4]  C. Merchant The Death of Nature , 1998 .

[5]  E. Keller,et al.  A feeling for the organism : the life and work of Barbara McClintock , 1985 .

[6]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. , 1991 .

[7]  Nancy R. Lawrence,et al.  Women's Science: Learning and Succeeding from the Margins , 1998 .

[8]  Sheila Tobias,et al.  They're Not Dumb. They're Different.: A New “Tier of Talent” for Science , 1990 .

[9]  Professional Development for University Scientists around Issues of Equity and Diversity: Investigating Dissent within Community. , 2002 .

[10]  Alberto J. Rodriguez Strategies for Counterresistance: Toward Sociotransformative Constructivism and Learning To Teach Science for Diversity and for Understanding. , 1998 .

[11]  Maralee Mayberry,et al.  Reproductive and resistant pedagogies: The comparative roles of collaborative learning and feminist pedagogy in science education , 1998 .

[12]  Sue V. Rosser,et al.  Female-Friendly Science: Applying Women's Studies Methods and Theories to Attract Students , 1990 .

[13]  L. Schiebinger,et al.  Has Feminism Changed Science? , 1999, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[14]  S. Haggerty Gender and teacher development: issues of power and culture 1 , 1995 .

[15]  N. Hartsock,et al.  Money, sex, and power : toward a feminist historical materialism , 1984 .

[16]  J. Banks The Historical Reconstruction of Knowledge About Race: Implications for Transformative Teaching , 1995 .

[17]  E. Rose,et al.  Meeting the Challenge: Innovative Feminist Pedagogies in Action , 1999 .

[18]  S. Harding,et al.  Is Science Multicultural?: Challenges, Resources, Opportunities, Uncertainties , 1994 .

[19]  H. Longino,et al.  The Women, Gender, and Science Question: What Do Research on Women in Science and Research on Gender and Science Have to Do with Each Other? , 1997, Osiris.

[20]  N. Brickhouse,et al.  What Kind of a Girl Does Science? The Construction of School Science Identities , 2000 .

[21]  Olugbemiro J. Jegede,et al.  Cross‐cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon , 1999 .

[22]  S. Lewis,et al.  The Politics and Practice of Equity: Experiences from Both Sides of the Pacific , 1996 .

[23]  S. Loucks-Horsley Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics , 1997 .

[24]  Angela B. Ginorio Warming the Climate for Women in Academic Science. , 1995 .

[25]  Patricia B. Campbell,et al.  One Project, Many Strategies: Making Preservice Teacher Education More Equitable. , 1997 .

[26]  David J. Hess,et al.  Science and technology in a multicultural world , 1994 .

[27]  Michael J. Reiss,et al.  Science Education For a Pluralist Society , 1993 .

[28]  Gregory J. Kelly,et al.  Methodological considerations for studying science-in-the-making in educational settings , 1998 .

[29]  Victoria Costa,et al.  When science is “another world”: Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science , 1995 .

[30]  Sheila Tobias,et al.  Revitalizing Undergraduate Science: Why Some Things Work and Most Don't , 1992 .

[31]  Sue V. Rosser,et al.  Teaching the Majority: Breaking the Gender Barrier in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering. , 1995 .

[32]  S. Fordham,et al.  Blacked Out: Dilemmas of Race, Identity, and Success at Capital High , 1996 .

[33]  Nancy Leys Stepan,et al.  Race and Gender: The Role of Analogy in Science , 1986, Isis.

[34]  Sue V. Rosser,et al.  Re-engineering female friendly science , 1997 .

[35]  S. Traweek,et al.  Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists , 1988 .

[36]  J. Cummins,et al.  The light in their eyes : creating multicultural learning communities , 2001 .

[37]  S. Harding Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women's Lives , 1993 .

[38]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  Development of a test of science‐related attitudes , 1978 .

[39]  E. Keller Reflections on Gender and Science , 1985 .

[40]  M. Eisenhart WOMEN SCIENTISTS AND THE NORM OF GENDER NEUTRALITY AT WORK , 1994 .

[41]  H. Longino Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry , 1990 .

[42]  S. Gilbert,et al.  The Importance of Feminist Critique for Contemporary Cell Biology , 1988, Hypatia.

[43]  R. Driver,et al.  Young people's images of science , 1996 .

[44]  Helen E. Longino,et al.  Can There Be A Feminist Science? , 1987, Hypatia.

[45]  J. McGinnis,et al.  TEACHING ELEMENTARY SCIENCE METHODS TO WOMEN : A MALE PROFESSOR'S EXPERIENCE FROM TWO PERSPECTIVES , 1998 .

[46]  S. Nieto Affirming Diversity: The Sociopolitical Context of Multicultural Education , 1991 .

[47]  C. Steele A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[48]  Margaret W. Rossiter,et al.  Women scientists in America : before affirmative action, 1940-1972 , 1996 .

[49]  Julie Gess-Newsome,et al.  Preservice teachers' views of inclusive science teaching as shaped by images of teaching, learning, and knowledge , 1999 .

[50]  F. Rutherford The role of inquiry in science teaching , 1964 .

[51]  S. Southerland Epistemic Universalism and The Shortcomings of Curricular Multicultural Science Education , 2000 .

[52]  Jenifer V. Helms,et al.  Sociology of science as a means to a more authentic, inclusive science education , 1998 .

[53]  Donna Haraway,et al.  Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science , 1990 .