Suction measurements as indicators of sample quality in soft clay

Soil samples removed from the ground during sampling possess a suction in their unconfined state. This suction may vary depending on the degree of disturbance induced during the sampling process. The objective of this work is to examine the feasibility of using suction measurements for sample quality assessment. A number of suction measuring techniques are reviewed and examined on samples of varying quality from two well-characterized soft clay sites. Onsoy in Norway and Ballinasloe in Ireland. Most of the techniques tested gave comparable results, although the cell pressure loading method provided the most variable measurements. The Japanese and University of Massachusetts Amherst suction probe techniques provide relatively quick and consistent suction measurements, requiring less than half an hour to stabilize. In terms of sample quality the Sherbrooke block samples consistently exhibit higher suctions than the 76 mm, 54 mm, and continuous soil samplers for the Onsoy test site. Suctions measured on the Japanese 75 mm samples are similar to those measured on the block samples. The 5 displacement sampler provides the highest suctions on the Ballinasloe samples. It is observed that the quality of samples indicated by suction measurements is similar to that inferred from the normalized change in void ratio (Delta e/e(0)) criterion.

[1]  Bre,et al.  A LOW-COST METHOD OF ASSESSING CLAY DESICCATION FOR LOW-RISE BUILDINGS. , 1992 .

[2]  Dw Hight,et al.  State-of-the-Art Paper: A Reevaluation of Conventional Triaxial Test Methods , 1988 .

[3]  Pankaj Sharma,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDY ON SAMPLE QUALITY USING SEVERAL TYPES OF SAMPLERS , 1996 .

[4]  Thomas C. Sheahan,et al.  Measurement of Suction in a Marine Clay as an Indicator of Sample Disturbance , 2005 .

[5]  Birger Schmidt,et al.  Earth Pressures at Rest Related to Stress History , 1966 .

[6]  John Burland,et al.  Soil matrix suction: some examples of its measurement and application in geotechnical engineering , 2003 .

[7]  D. W. Hight,et al.  A SIMPLE PIEZOMETER PROBE FOR THE ROUTINE MEASUREMENT OF PORE PRESSURE IN TRIAXIAL TESTS ON SATURATED SOILS , 1982 .

[8]  D. W. Hight.  Sampling Effects in Soft Clay: An Update on Ladd and Lambe (1963) , 2003 .

[9]  D G Fredlund,et al.  Use of the tensile strength of water for the direct measurement of high soil suction , 1997 .

[10]  S. Aversa,et al.  A triaxial and oedometer apparatus for testing unsaturated soils , 2002 .

[11]  John Burland,et al.  Use of the tensile strength of water for the direct measurement of high soil suction: Discussion , 1999 .

[12]  Guy Lefebvre,et al.  A new method of sampling in sensitive clay , 1979 .

[13]  Hiroyuki Tanaka,et al.  MAIN FACTORS GOVERNING RESIDUAL EFFECTIVE STRESS FOR COHESIVE SOILS SAMPLED BY TUBE SAMPLING , 2006 .

[14]  Michael Long,et al.  Rapid determination of soil sample quality using shear wave velocity and suction measurements , 2007 .

[15]  Michael Long,et al.  Field behaviour of very soft clays at the Athlone embankments , 2001 .

[16]  Charles C. Ladd,et al.  Recommended Practice for Soft Ground Site Characterization: Arthur Casagrande Lecture Práctica Recomendada para la Caracterización de Sitios en Terreno Blando: Conferencia Arthur Casagrande , 2004 .

[17]  C.R.I. Clayton,et al.  Disturbance of the Bothkennar clay prior to laboratory testing , 1992 .

[18]  T. Lambe,et al.  The Strength of “Undisturbed” Clay Determined from Undrained Tests , 1964 .

[19]  J. Graham,et al.  Estimation of in situ stresses using anisotropic elasticity and suction measurements , 2000 .

[20]  B. Broms.  Soil Sampling in Europe: State-of-the-Art , 1980 .

[21]  Serge Leroueil,et al.  Characterisation and engineering properties of natural soils , 2006 .

[22]  Harianto Rahardjo,et al.  Factors affecting the filter paper method for total and matric suction measurements , 2002 .

[23]  Stress Relief Disturbance and Residual Pore Pressure in Cohesive Soils , 2000 .

[24]  Hiroyuki Tanaka,et al.  Characteristics of Soils with Low Plasticity: Intermediate Soil from Ishinomaki, Japan and Lean Clay From Drammen, Norway , 2001 .

[25]  Hiroyuki Tanaka.  Sampling and sample quality of soft clays , 2008 .

[26]  J. A. Charles,et al.  Discussion: In situ measurement of horizontal stress in overconsolidated clay using push-in spade-shaped pressure cells , 1981 .

[27]  M. Long,et al.  Assessment of sample quality in soft clay using shear wave velocity and suction measurements , 2010 .

[28]  John Burland,et al.  A simple axial displacement gauge for use in the triaxial apparatus , 1982 .