Learning How Organizations Mitigate Risk

Over time, more and more organizations, whose technical and industrial activities are capable of causing perceptible adverse public effects, feel pressure from their external environment to greatly reduce the incidence of errors or failure. This paper describes the first phase of research designed to extend the HRO findings and approaches to studying organizations that are not yet experiencing similar pressures, but may soon be. Preliminary work supports four hypotheses that were generated by literature on resource dependency which was developed and applied to the marine industry. Future research will extend observations further, ultimately returning to such primary issues of the original research as decision making, culture, adaptation to technology and structure, but applying these issues to a wider variety of cases, outcomes and approaches.

[1]  K. Roberts Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organization , 1990 .

[2]  and G I Rochlin,et al.  Nuclear Power Operations: A Cross-Cultural Perspective , 1994 .

[3]  Todd R. La Porte,et al.  Regulatory Compliance and the Ethos of Quality Enhancement: Surprises in Nuclear Power Plant Operations1 , 1995 .

[4]  David Woods,et al.  On taking human performance seriously in risk analysis: Comments on dougherty , 1990 .

[5]  K. Roberts Managing High Reliability Organizations , 1990 .

[6]  Sonja B. Haber,et al.  Organizational processes and nuclear power plant safety , 1994 .

[7]  K. Weick Organizational Culture as a Source of High Reliability , 1987 .

[8]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Environments of Organizations , 1976 .

[9]  S. Stout,et al.  Decision Dynamics in Two High Reliability Military Organizations , 1994 .

[10]  Paul R. Schulman,et al.  The Negotiated Order of Organizational Reliability , 1993 .

[11]  Paul R. Schulman,et al.  Heroes, Organizations and High Reliability , 1996 .

[12]  R. Emerson Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[13]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  The culture of high reliability: quantitative and qualitative assessment aboard nuclear-powered aircraft carriers , 1994 .

[14]  T. Laporte,et al.  Working in Practice But Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of “High-Reliability Organizations” , 1991 .

[15]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .