The Montevideo Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: A Short Review

The Montevideo interpretation of quantum mechanics, which consists of supplementing environmental decoherence with fundamental limitations in measurement stemming from gravity, has been described in several publications. However, some of them appeared before the full picture provided by the interpretation was developed. As such, it can be difficult to get a good understanding via the published literature. Here, we summarize it in a self-contained brief presentation including all its principal elements.

[1]  Michael R. Vanner,et al.  Probing Planck-scale physics with quantum optics , 2011, Nature Physics.

[2]  J. Pullin,et al.  Fundamental decoherence from quantum gravity: a pedagogical review , 2006, gr-qc/0603090.

[3]  William K. Wootters,et al.  Evolution without evolution: Dynamics described by stationary observables , 1983 .

[4]  Rodolfo Gambini,et al.  An axiomatic formulation of the Montevideo interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2010, 1002.4209.

[5]  C. Stivers Class , 2010 .

[6]  Time from quantum entanglement: an experimental illustration , 2013, 1310.4691.

[7]  D. Wallace Decoherence and Ontology, or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love FAPP , 2011, 1111.2189.

[8]  B. Russell The Analysis of Matter , 1927 .

[9]  GianCarlo Ghirardi,et al.  Sneaking a Look at God's Cards: Unraveling the Mysteries of Quantum Mechanics , 2004 .

[10]  Y. Ng,et al.  LIMIT TO SPACE-TIME MEASUREMENT , 1994 .

[11]  B. D'espagnat Towards a separable “empirical reality”? , 1990 .

[12]  A. Whitehead Science and the Modern World , 1926 .

[13]  King,et al.  Generation of nonclassical motional states of a trapped atom. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[14]  I. Stamatescu,et al.  Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory , 1996 .

[15]  Dreyer,et al.  Quantum Rabi oscillation: A direct test of field quantization in a cavity. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[16]  K. Roberts,et al.  Thesis , 2002 .

[17]  Karel V. Kuchař,et al.  TIME AND INTERPRETATIONS OF QUANTUM GRAVITY , 2011 .

[18]  E. Wigner,et al.  Quantum Limitations of the Measurement of Space-Time Distances , 1958 .

[19]  B. Blank,et al.  The Road to Reality : A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe , 2006 .

[20]  W. Zurek Environment-induced superselection rules , 1982 .

[21]  Thawing the Frozen Formalism : The Difference Between Observables and What We Observe Essay for the Festschrift of , 1992 .

[22]  E. Anderson Triangleland: I. Classical dynamics with exchange of relative angular momentum , 2008, 0809.1168.

[23]  Maximilian Schlosshauer,et al.  Decoherence and the Quantum-To-Classical Transition , 2008 .

[24]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[25]  Eugene P. Wigner,et al.  Relativistic Invariance and Quantum Phenomena , 1957 .

[26]  R. Omnes Decoherence and Ontology , 2019, Synthese Library.

[27]  J. Pullin,et al.  Undecidability and the Problem of Outcomes in Quantum Measurements , 2009, 0905.4222.

[28]  Rovelli,et al.  Time in quantum gravity: An hypothesis. , 1991, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[29]  R. Penrose,et al.  Quantum Concepts in Space and Time , 1986 .

[30]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Black hole computers. , 2004, Scientific American.

[31]  Y. Ng,et al.  Limitation to Quantum Measurements of Space‐Time Distances a , 1994, hep-th/9406110.

[32]  C. Ross Found , 1869, The Dental register.

[33]  J. Pullin,et al.  Undecidability as solution to the problem of measurement: fundamental criterion for the production of events , 2010, 1009.3817.

[34]  J. Butterfield Assessing the Montevideo Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2014, 1406.4351.

[35]  Are there fundamental limits for observing quantum phenomena from within quantum theory , 2010, 1009.2654.

[36]  Palle E. T. Jorgensen,et al.  The road to reality: a complete guide to the laws of the universe , 2006 .

[37]  J. Pullin,et al.  Conditional probabilities with Dirac observables and the problem of time in quantum gravity , 2008, 0809.4235.