Effect of anisotropy and destructuration on the behavior of Murro test embankment

This paper investigates the influence of anisotropy and destructuration on the behavior of a test embankment on soft clay. The test embankment at Murro, Finland, was commissioned in 1993 by the Finnish Road Administration and has been monitored for over 10 years. The construction and consolidation of Murro test embankment is analyzed with finite element method using three different constitutive models to represent the soft soil. The results are compared with field observations. The constitutive models used include two recently proposed constitutive models, namely S-CLAY1 that accounts for initial and plastic strain induced anisotropy and its extension, called S-CLAY1S. The S-CLAY1S model accounts, additionally, for interparticle bonding and degradation of bonds. For comparison, the test embankment is also analyzed using the isotropic Modified Cam Clay model. The simulations demonstrate that for this type of problem, it is important to account for the anisotropy, whereas destructuration appears to have less influence on predicted deformations. However, only a model incorporating destructuration can explain the decrease in undrained shear strength during consolidation that was measured in field.

[1]  Andrew J. Whittle,et al.  Formulation of a unified constitutive model for clays and sands , 1999 .

[2]  S. Wheeler,et al.  An anisotropic elastoplastic model for soft clays , 2003 .

[3]  Andrew J. Whittle,et al.  Formulation of MIT-E3 constitutive model for overconsolidated clays , 1994 .

[4]  Martin D. Liu,et al.  Modeling Compression Behavior of Structured Geomaterials , 2003 .

[5]  Richard J. Jardine,et al.  Anisotropy and destructuration of Murro clay , 2004 .

[6]  J. Carter,et al.  A structured Cam Clay model , 2002 .

[7]  R. Nova,et al.  A constitutive model for bonded geomaterials subject to mechanical and/or chemical degradation , 2003 .

[8]  D. Muir Wood,et al.  A new approach to anisotropic, bounding surface plasticity: general formulation and simulations of natural and reconstituted clay behaviour , 2001 .

[9]  P. K. Banerjee,et al.  A plasticity model for the mechanical behaviour of anisotropically consolidated clay , 1986 .

[10]  Mohamed Rouainia,et al.  A kinematic hardening constitutive model for natural clays with loss of structure , 2000 .

[11]  Minna Karstunen,et al.  Influence of anisotropy and destructuration on undrained shearing of natural clays , 2002 .

[12]  Minna Karstunen,et al.  Influence of anisotropy and destructuration on an embankment on soft clay , 2003 .

[13]  M. Cudny,et al.  Results from a geotechnical benchmark exercise of an embankment on soft clay , 2003 .

[14]  H. B. Halsall,et al.  Development and Characterization of Microfluidic Devices and Systems for Magnetic Bead-Based Biochemical Detection , 2001 .

[15]  Angelo Amorosi,et al.  A constitutive model for structured soils , 2000 .

[16]  K. Roscoe,et al.  ON THE GENERALIZED STRESS-STRAIN BEHAVIOUR OF WET CLAY , 1968 .

[17]  O. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Time-dependent multilaminate model of rocks—a numerical study of deformation and failure of rock masses , 1977 .

[18]  Yannis F. Dafalias,et al.  An anisotropic critical state soil plasticity model , 1986 .

[19]  Minna Karstunen,et al.  Anisotropy of reconstituted POKO clay , 2002 .

[20]  P. K. Banerjee,et al.  Finite element analysis of the stability of a vertical cut using an anisotropic soil model , 1988 .