Manuscript revision and response to the referees

Coinciding monsoon and typhoon seasons in the Philippines cause torrential rainfall, and associated hazards such as flooding and landslides. While early warning systems require accurate radar-based rainfall estimates, low-density rain gauge networks in the Philippines make it challenging to monitor the calibration of the ground-based radars (GRs). As an alternative, we ::: We explore the potential of spaceborne radar (SR) observations from the Ku-band precipitation radars on board the TRMM and 5 GPM satellites as a reference to quantify the calibration bias of an S-band GRin the Philippines ::::: ground ::::: radar ::::: (GR) ::::::::: reflectivity ::: bias. To this end, the 3D volume-matching algorithm proposed by Schwaller and Morris (2009) ::::::::::::::::::::::: Schwaller and Morris (2011) is implemented and applied to five years (2012-2016) of observations. We further extend the procedure by a framework to take into account the data quality of each ground radar bin. Through these methods, we are able to assign a quality index to each matching SR-GR :::::: SR–GR : volume, and thus compute the GR calibration bias as a quality-weighted average of reflectivity 10 differences in any sample of matching GR-SR :::::: GR–SR : volumes. We exemplify the idea of quality-weighted averaging by using the beam blockage fraction as a :: the : basis of a quality index. As a result, we can increase the consistency of SR and GR observations, and thus the precision of calibration bias estimates. The remaining scatter between GR and SR reflectivity, as well as the variability of bias estimates between overpass events indicate, however, that other error sources are not yet fully addressed. Still, our study provides a framework to introduce any other quality variables that are considered relevant 15 in a specific context. The code that implements our analysis is based on the open source software library wradlib, and is, together with the data, publicly available to monitor radar calibration, or to scrutinize long series of archived radar data back to December 1997, when TRMM became operational. Copyright statement.

[1]  P. M. Austin,et al.  Relation between Measured Radar Reflectivity and Surface Rainfall , 1987 .

[2]  C. Kummerow,et al.  The Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Sensor Package , 1998 .

[3]  Ziad S. Haddad,et al.  Effects of Nonuniform Beam Filling on Rainfall Retrieval for the TRMM Precipitation Radar , 1998 .

[4]  Jeffrey A. Jones,et al.  Use of the Surface Reference Technique for Path Attenuation Estimates from the TRMM Precipitation Radar , 2000 .

[5]  Robert A. Houze,et al.  Comparison of Radar Data from the TRMM Satellite and Kwajalein Oceanic Validation Site , 2000 .

[6]  Toshio Iguchi,et al.  Comparisons of Rain Rate and Reflectivity Factor Derived from the TRMM Precipitation Radar and the WSR-88D over the Melbourne, Florida, Site , 2001 .

[7]  Robert A. Houze,et al.  Stratiform Rain in the Tropics as Seen by the TRMM Precipitation Radar , 2003 .

[8]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  4 COMPARISON OF TRMM SATELLITE-BASED RAINFALL WITH SURFACE RADAR AND GAUGE INFORMATION 1 , 2003 .

[9]  David Bebbington,et al.  The Sensitivity of Single Polarization Weather Radar Beam Blockage Correction to Variability in the Vertical Refractivity Gradient , 2003 .

[10]  Christopher R. Williams,et al.  Uncertainties in Oceanic Radar Rain Maps at Kwajalein and Implications for Satellite Validation , 2004 .

[11]  Luca Ferraris,et al.  Effects of propagation conditions on radar beam-ground interaction: impact on data quality , 2005 .

[12]  Weather radar data quality in Europe : quality control and characterisation , 2005 .

[13]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  A systems approach to GPM dual-frequency retrieval , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Silas C. Michaelides,et al.  Range adjustment for ground-based radar, derived with the spaceborne TRMM precipitation radar , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  John D. Hunter,et al.  Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[16]  Eyal Amitai,et al.  Comparison of TRMM Radar Rainfall Estimates with NOAA Next-Generation QPE , 2009 .

[17]  David B. Wolff,et al.  Comparisons of Reflectivities from the TRMM Precipitation Radar and Ground-Based Radars , 2009 .

[18]  Toshio Iguchi,et al.  GPM/DPR Level-2 Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document , 2010 .

[19]  T. Einfalt,et al.  The quality index for radar precipitation data: a tower of Babel? , 2010 .

[20]  Wes McKinney,et al.  Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python , 2010, SciPy.

[21]  Mathew R. Schwaller,et al.  A Ground Validation Network for the Global Precipitation Measurement Mission , 2011 .

[22]  C. Kummerow,et al.  Comparison of Drop Size Distribution Parameter (D0) and Rain Rate from S-Band Dual-Polarized Ground Radar, TRMM Precipitation Radar (PR), and Combined PR–TMI: Two Events from Kwajalein Atoll , 2012 .

[23]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Microwave radar signatures of precipitation from S band to Ka band: application to GPM mission , 2012 .

[24]  Thomas Pfaff,et al.  Technical Note: An open source library for processing weather radar data (wradlib) , 2012 .

[25]  Y. Hong,et al.  Comparison of TRMM 2A25 Products, Version 6 and Version 7, with NOAA/NSSL Ground Radar-Based National Mosaic QPE , 2013 .

[26]  A. Bronstert,et al.  Brief communication "Using the new Philippine radar network to reconstruct the Habagat of August 2012 monsoon event around Metropolitan Manila" , 2013 .

[27]  Yang Hong,et al.  Empirical conversion of the vertical profile of reflectivity from Ku‐band to S‐band frequency , 2013 .

[28]  Jan Szturc,et al.  Chain of data quality algorithms for 3‐D single‐polarization radar reflectivity (RADVOL‐QC system) , 2014 .

[29]  A. Hou,et al.  The Global Precipitation Measurement Mission , 2014 .

[30]  Mathew R. Schwaller,et al.  Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Ground Validation (GV) Prototype in the Korean Peninsula , 2014 .

[31]  Riko Oki,et al.  Evaluation of Precipitation Estimates by at-Launch Codes of GPM/DPR Algorithms Using Synthetic Data from TRMM/PR Observations , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[32]  Fumie A. Furuzawa,et al.  Early Evaluation of Ku- and Ka-Band Sensitivities for the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) , 2015 .

[33]  Toshio Iguchi,et al.  Intercomparison of Attenuation Correction Methods for the GPM Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar , 2015 .

[34]  Michael Dixon,et al.  The emergence of open-source software for the weather radar community , 2015 .

[35]  Ian Simmonds,et al.  A New Method for Identifying the Pacific–South American Pattern and Its Influence on Regional Climate Variability , 2016 .

[36]  Damien Irving,et al.  A Minimum Standard for Publishing Computational Results in the Weather and Climate Sciences , 2016 .

[37]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Airborne laser scan data: a valuable tool with which to infer weather radar partial beam blockage in urban environments , 2016 .

[38]  Y. Hong,et al.  Cross-evaluation of reflectivity from the space-borne precipitation radar and multi-type ground-based weather radar network in China , 2017 .

[39]  Peter J. Speirs,et al.  A Comparison between the GPM Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar and Ground-Based Radar Precipitation Rate Estimates in the Swiss Alps and Plateau , 2017 .

[40]  Marco Gabella,et al.  Measurement of Precipitation in the Alps Using Dual-Polarization C-Band Ground-Based Radars, the GPM Spaceborne Ku-Band Radar, and Rain Gauges , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[41]  G. Vulpiani,et al.  Validation of GPM Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) Rainfall Products over Italy , 2018 .

[42]  Nan Li,et al.  The establishment of optimal ground‐based radar datasets by comparison and correlation analyses with space‐borne radar data , 2018 .