Getting to ‘know’ connectors? Evaluating data-driven learningin a writing skills course

This paper sets out to evaluate the effect on learners’ knowledge and use of language of one prominent technique in corpus pedagogy, the data-driven use of corpus concordances with learners as researchers, or Data-Driven Learning (DDL) (Johns 1988, 1991). More specifically, the paper attempts measurement of the effect of DDL on the achievement of the goal of appropriate production by learners of logical connectors, an important subskill in the context of the wider objective of the acquisition of basic academic writing skills in English. The evaluation uses learner corpora from experimental and control groups, supported by other methods. The conclusion is that DDL, applied in the context of the communicative teaching of writing skills, is moderately effective, and that there is potential both for the further development of learner corpora in an evaluative role, and for use of a wider range of instrumentation.

[1]  D. Nunan Research methods in language learning , 1992 .

[2]  Tim Johns,et al.  Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar: From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of Data-driven Learning , 1994 .

[3]  D. Baca,et al.  A cognitive approach to language learning , 2006 .

[4]  S. Granger,et al.  Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non‐native EFL speakers of English , 1996 .

[5]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Causes and functions of linguistic awareness in language acquisition : some introductory remarks , 1978 .

[6]  Tom Cobb,et al.  Is There Any Measurable Learning from Hands-On Concordancing?. , 1997 .

[7]  Tim F. Johns Micro-concord: A language learner's research tool , 1986 .

[8]  G. Kasper,et al.  Pragmatic Knowledge: Rules and Procedures , 1984 .

[9]  Geoffrey N. Leech,et al.  Computers in English language teaching and research : selected papers from the 1984 Lancaster symposium 'Computers in English language education and research' , 1986 .

[10]  Greg Myers Interaction in writing: principles and problems. , 1999 .

[11]  T Johns,et al.  Should you be persuaded. Two samples of data-driven learningmaterials , 1991 .

[12]  P. Beauvais A Speech Act Theory of Metadiscourse , 1989 .

[13]  Guy Aston,et al.  Enriching reality: language corpora in language pedagogy , 2001 .

[14]  Eugene O. Winter,et al.  A clause-relational approach to English texts: A study of some predictive lexical items in written discourse , 1977 .

[15]  Bengt Altenberg,et al.  The use of adverbial connectors in advanced Swedish learners' written English , 1998 .

[16]  T. Johns Whence and Whither Classroom Concordancing , 1988 .

[17]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  A Theoretical Model of Second Language Learning , 1978 .

[18]  W. J. V. Kopple,et al.  Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse , 1985, College Composition & Communication.

[19]  Winnie Cheng,et al.  The language learner as language researcher: putting corpus linguistics on the timetable , 2003 .

[20]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[21]  G. Aston Learning with corpora , 2001 .

[22]  Anne Wichmann,et al.  Teaching and Language Corpora , 1997 .

[23]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  English Text: System and structure , 1992 .

[24]  L. S. Vygotksy Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[25]  L. Gavioli The learner as researcher: introducing corpus concordancing in the classroom , 2001 .