Effect of a heterospecific predator on the oviposition behavior of Phytoseiulus persimilis

Oviposition rate is affected by several factors such as con- and heterospecific competitors, food availability and patch quality. When the species have interacted for a sufficient period of time, the predator could profit from the ability to associate odors from the competitor with the risk of its eggs being attacked or eaten by that competitor. We examined the oviposition rate of Phytoseiulus persimilis for a response for signals emanating from its heterospecific competitor, Frankliniella occidentalis in the presence of their shared prey, Tetranychus urticae on rose and bean leaf patches . In the treatments in which the predatory mite and thrips were exposed to each other, a significant reduction was observed in the number of deposited eggs compared to the control experiment. The same result was found in an experiment in which the exposure time was limited to the pre-oviposition period of the predatory mite. Increasing the time elapsed since the two competitors were exposed to each other to 2 days, the effect of thrips on the oviposition rate of the predatory mite had vanished and approached the oviposition rate in the control experiment. The plant species used as a substrate for the interspecific interactions did not significantly alter the results. We discuss the potential  consequences of the presence of thrips for the ability of P. persimilis to control the two spotted spider mite.

[1]  J. Takabayashi,et al.  Predator avoidance in phytophagous mites: response to present danger depends on alternative host quality , 2007, Oecologia.

[2]  C. C. Childers,et al.  Evidence for host plant preference by Iphiseiodes quadripilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Citrus , 2006, Experimental & Applied Acarology.

[3]  A. Walzer,et al.  Oviposition Behavior of Interacting Predatory Mites: Response to the Presence of Con- and Heterospecific Eggs , 2006, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[4]  M. Sabelis,et al.  Prey attack and predators defend: counterattacking prey trigger parental care in predators , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  M. Sabelis,et al.  Life-history trade-off in two predator species sharing the same prey: a study on cassava-inhabiting mites , 2003 .

[6]  A. Janssen,et al.  Poor host plant quality causes omnivore to consume predator eggs , 2003 .

[7]  A. Walzer,et al.  Cannibalism and interspecific predation in the phytoseiid mites Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus: predation rates and effects on reproduction and juvenile development , 1999, BioControl.

[8]  B. Croft,et al.  Do literature records of predation reflect food specialization and predation types among phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae)? , 1998, Experimental & Applied Acarology.

[9]  M. Sabelis,et al.  Improved control capacity of the mite predator Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on tomato , 1997, Experimental & Applied Acarology.

[10]  M. Baalen,et al.  When should a female avoid adding eggs to the clutch of another female? A simultaneous oviposition and sex allocation game , 1996, Evolutionary Ecology.

[11]  J. Takabayashi,et al.  Predation-related odours reduce oviposition in a herbivorous mite , 2009, Experimental and Applied Acarology.

[12]  A. D. Roos,et al.  Predators induce egg retention in prey , 2006, Oecologia.

[13]  Maurice W. Sabelis,et al.  Predatory mites avoid ovipositing near counterattacking prey , 2004, Experimental & Applied Acarology.

[14]  M. Mangel,et al.  Oviposition habitat selection in response to risk of predation in temporary pools: mode of detection and consistency across experimental venue , 2003, Oecologia.

[15]  M. Sabelis,et al.  Interactions between arthropod predators and plants: A conspiracy against herbivorous arthropods? , 1999 .

[16]  M. Sabelis,et al.  Long range dispersal and searching behaviour , 1985 .