Output-based management and the management of performance: insights from the Victorian experience

Abstract During the 1990s, the nature of general and financial management practices within the public sectors of many jurisdictions underwent significant change. The Australian state of Victoria represents an example of a jurisdiction in which the extent of change was particularly large. In the context of that state’s adoption of an output-based budgeting and management framework, the development and reporting of performance indicator data became a matter of increased significance in sustaining continuous improvement. This paper reports the results of a study of performance data reported within the Victorian public sector, and highlights problems indicated by high degrees of turnover in inventories of reported indicators over time.

[1]  J. Guthrie.  Application of accrual accounting in the Australian public sector - rhetoric or reality? , 1998 .

[2]  Public Management Reform: Some Lessons from the Antipodes , 2001 .

[3]  B. Smith,et al.  The dilemma of accountability in modern government: Independence versus control; , 1971 .

[4]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Learning from international public management reform experience , 2001 .

[5]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Emasculating Public Accountability in the Name of Competition: Transformation of State Audit in Victoria , 2001 .

[6]  M. Aiken,et al.  AAS 29 And Public-Sector Reporting: Unresolved Issues , 1994 .

[7]  T. Carlin.  Victoria's Accrual Output Based Budgeting System - Delivering as Promised? Some Empirical Evidence , 2006 .

[8]  Nick M Economou,et al.  The Kennett revolution : Victorian politics in the 1990s , 1999 .

[9]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Public Sector Management in the State of Victoria 1992–1999: Genesis of the Transformation , 2001 .

[10]  I. Lapsley.  THE ACCOUNTING AND ORGANISATIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF PRIVATISATION AND REGULATION , 1993 .

[11]  I. Lapsley,et al.  Accounting and performance measurement : issues in the private and public sectors , 1996 .

[12]  Noel Hyndman,et al.  The use of performance information in external reporting: An empirical study of UK executive agencies , 1995 .

[13]  James M. Patton.  ACCOUNTABILITY AND GOVERNMENTAL FINANCIAL REPORTING , 1992 .

[14]  A. Wildavsky.  The New Politics of the Budgetary Process , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[15]  J. Wanna,et al.  Managing Public Expenditure in Australia , 2020 .

[16]  T. Carlin.  Unravelling the Capital Charging Riddle - Some Empirical Evidence from Victoria , 2003 .

[17]  J. Guthrie.  AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC BUSINESS ENTERPRISES: ANALYSIS OF CHANGING ACCOUNTING, AUDITING AND ACCOUNTABILITY REGIMES , 1993 .

[18]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Learning from international public management reform , 2001 .

[19]  K. Paul.  RESEARCH IN PUBLIC POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[20]  Public Accountability and Audit: A Reconnaissance , 1971 .

[21]  M. Gaffney.  Consolidated versus fund-type accounting statements: The perspectives of constituents , 1986 .

[22]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Lessons from Australian and New Zealand experiences with accrual output-based budgeting , 2001 .

[23]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Global Warning: Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management , 1998 .

[24]  J. Guthrie,et al.  EXTERNAL ANNUAL REPORTING BY AN AUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITY: CHANGING PATTERNS , 1993 .

[25]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Debating Developments in New Public Financial Management: The Limits of Global Theorising and Some New Ways Forward , 1999 .

[26]  A. Barton.  Public and Private Sector Accounting - The Non-identical Twins , 1999 .

[27]  J. Shaoul.  The power of accounting: reflecting on water privatization? , 1997 .

[28]  A. Wildavsky,et al.  The Politics of the Budgetary Process. , 1965 .

[29]  D. Hay.  Who Uses Public Sector External Reports: An Exploration , 1994 .

[30]  J. Courtis.  Annual report readability variability: tests of the obfuscation hypothesis , 1998 .

[31]  J. Mack,et al.  Local Government Reports: Australian Empirical Evidence on Recipients , 2001 .