Behavioral distraction by auditory novelty is not only about novelty: The role of the distracter’s informational value

Unexpected events often distract us. In the laboratory, novel auditory stimuli have been shown to capture attention away from a focal visual task and yield specific electrophysiological responses as well as a behavioral cost to performance. Distraction is thought to follow ineluctably from the sound's low probability of occurrence or, put more simply, its unexpected occurrence. Our study challenges this view with respect to behavioral distraction and argues that past research failed to identify the informational value of sound as a mediator of novelty distraction. We report an experiment showing that (1) behavioral novelty distraction is only observed when the sound announces the occurrence and timing of an upcoming visual target (as is the case in all past research); (2) that no such distraction is observed for deviant sounds conveying no such information; and that (3) deviant sounds can actually facilitate performance when these, but not the standards, convey information. We conclude that behavioral novelty distraction, as observed in oddball tasks, is observed in the presence of novel sounds but only when the cognitive system can take advantage of the auditory distracters to optimize performance.

[1]  S. Berti Cognitive control after distraction: event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[2]  I. Winkler,et al.  Effects of ethanol and auditory distraction on forced choice reaction time. , 1996, Alcohol.

[3]  C. Escera,et al.  Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  E. Schröger,et al.  Auditory distraction with different presentation rates: an event-related potential and behavioral study , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  H. Woodrow The measurement of attention , 1914 .

[6]  Carles Escera,et al.  Negative emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing , 2008, Neuroreport.

[7]  M. Dawson,et al.  Is elicitation of the autonomic orienting response associated with allocation of processing resources? , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[8]  Carles Escera,et al.  ERPs and behavioural indices of long-term preattentive and attentive deficits after closed head injury , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  R. Knight,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Involuntary Attention to Acoustic Novelty and Change , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  G. V. Boxtel,et al.  Auditory P300 and mismatch negativity in comatose states , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  S. Hackley The speeding of voluntary reaction by a warning signal. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[13]  K Alho,et al.  Effects of involuntary auditory attention on visual task performance and brain activity , 1997, Neuroreport.

[14]  K Alho,et al.  Cerebral mechanisms underlying orienting of attention towards auditory frequency changes , 2001, Neuroreport.

[15]  P Bertelson,et al.  The Time Course of Preparation* , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  T. Picton,et al.  Mismatch Negativity: Different Water in the Same River , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.

[17]  C. Escera,et al.  Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of gender differences in the modulation of distraction by the emotional context , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[18]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Distributed neuronal networks for encoding category‐specific semantic information: the mismatch negativity to action words , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[19]  D. Woods,et al.  Auditory selective attention in middle-aged and elderly subjects: an event-related brain potential study. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  D L Braff,et al.  Increased distractibility in schizophrenic patients. Electrophysiologic and behavioral evidence. , 1990, Archives of general psychiatry.

[21]  M. Maybery,et al.  The involuntary capture of attention by novel feature pairings: A study of voice—location integration in auditory sensory memory , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[22]  C. Escera,et al.  Activation of brain mechanisms of attention switching as a function of auditory frequency change , 2001, Neuroreport.

[23]  David Friedman,et al.  Brain potentials to sexually suggestive whistles show meaning modulates the mismatch negativity , 2005, Neuroreport.

[24]  E. Schröger,et al.  A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: behavioral and event-related indices. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  R. Davis,et al.  Intersensory differences in the effect of warning signals on reaction time , 1969 .

[26]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Effects of Attention on Neuroelectric Correlates of Auditory Stream Segregation , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  D. Friedman,et al.  The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[28]  Carles Escera,et al.  Attention capture by auditory significant stimuli: semantic analysis follows attention switching , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  R. Knight Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection , 1996, Nature.

[30]  J. T. Marsh,et al.  Probing the time-course of the auditory oddball P3 with secondary reaction time. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[31]  W. Wundt,et al.  Grundzüge der physiologischen psyhcologie , 1893 .

[32]  Carles Escera,et al.  The effect of age on involuntary capture of attention by irrelevant sounds: A test of the frontal hypothesis of aging , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  F. Freeman Experimental analysis of the writing movement. , 1914 .

[34]  Carles Escera,et al.  When Loading Working Memory Reduces Distraction: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence from an Auditory-Visual Distraction Paradigm , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  E. Schröger The mismatch negativity as a tool to study auditory processing , 2005 .

[36]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Effects of auditory distraction on electrophysiological brain activity and performance in children aged 8-13 years. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[37]  I. Winkler,et al.  The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  J. Polich,et al.  P3a from Visual Stimuli: Typicality, Task, and Topography , 2004, Brain Topography.

[39]  Francisco Barceló,et al.  Task Switching and Novelty Processing Activate a Common Neural Network for Cognitive Control , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  C. Escera,et al.  The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task , 2008, Cognition.

[41]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Foreperiod and simple reaction time. , 1981 .

[42]  C. Escera,et al.  Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction , 2008, Neuroreport.

[43]  M. Sabri,et al.  Effects of sequential and temporal probability of deviant occurrence on mismatch negativity. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[44]  R. Näätänen,et al.  The duration of a neuronal trace of an auditory stimulus as indicated by event-related potentials , 1987, Biological Psychology.

[45]  Robert T Knight,et al.  An information-theoretical approach to contextual processing in the human brain: evidence from prefrontal lesions. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  J. Sergeant,et al.  When distraction is not distracting: A behavioral and ERP study on distraction in ADHD , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[47]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[48]  D. Linden,et al.  Attention capture by novel sounds: Distraction versus facilitation , 2010 .

[49]  D Morlet,et al.  Mismatch negativity and late auditory evoked potentials in comatose patients , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[50]  E. Schröger,et al.  Violation of expectation: Neural correlates reflect bases of prediction , 2008 .

[51]  P. Andrés,et al.  The involuntary capture of attention by sound: novelty and postnovelty distraction in young and older adults. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[52]  M. Bar The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[53]  R. Knight,et al.  P300 generation by novel somatosensory stimuli. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[54]  C. Escera,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of abnormal activation of the cerebral network of involuntary attention in alcoholism , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[55]  R Näätänen,et al.  The diminishing time-uncertainty with the lapse of time after the warning signal in reaction-time experiments with varying fore-periods. , 1970, Acta psychologica.

[56]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Brain activity index of distractibility in normal school-age children , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[57]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Language outside the focus of attention: The mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes , 2006, Progress in Neurobiology.

[58]  Erich Schrger,et al.  A Neural Mechanism for Involuntary Attention Shifts to Changes in Auditory Stimulation , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  Helen M. Morgan,et al.  On the functional significance of Novelty-P3: Facilitation by unexpected novel sounds , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[60]  F. Parmentier,et al.  Distraction by auditory novelty. The course and aftermath of novelty and semantic effects. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[61]  R T Knight,et al.  Age effects on the P300 to novel somatosensory stimuli. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[62]  Carles Escera,et al.  An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of involuntary attention towards auditory frequency, duration and intensity changes. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[63]  Wim Fias,et al.  Post-error slowing: An orienting account , 2009, Cognition.

[64]  C. Escera,et al.  Emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing in superior temporal gyrus. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[65]  E. Schröger,et al.  Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: a new distraction paradigm. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[66]  P. Lavie,et al.  `Oddball' event-related potentials and information processing during REM and non-REM sleep , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[67]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of enhanced distractibility in ADHD children , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[68]  F. Parmentier Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: The role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing , 2008, Cognition.

[69]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Response repetition vs. response change modulates behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distraction. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[70]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[71]  Jessica K Ljungberg,et al.  A behavioral study of distraction by vibrotactile novelty. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[72]  E. Schröger,et al.  Bottom-up influences on working memory: behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength. , 2004, Experimental psychology.