Intense ultrasonic clicks from echolocating toothed whales do not elicit anti–predator responses or debilitate the squid Loligo pealeii

Toothed whales use intense ultrasonic clicks to echolocate prey and it has been hypothesized that they also acoustically debilitate their prey with these intense sound pulses to facilitate capture. Cephalopods are an important food source for toothed whales, and there has probably been an evolutionary selection pressure on cephalopods to develop a mechanism for detecting and evading sound–emitting toothed whale predators. Ultrasonic detection has evolved in some insects to avoid echolocating bats, and it can be hypothesized that cephalopods might have evolved similar ultrasound detection as an anti–predation measure. We test this hypothesis in the squid Loligo pealeii in a playback experiment using intense echolocation clicks from two squid–eating toothed whale species. Twelve squid were exposed to clicks at two repetition rates (16 and 125 clicks per second) with received sound pressure levels of 199–226 dB re 1 μPa (pp) mimicking the sound exposure from an echolocating toothed whale as it approaches and captures prey. We demonstrate that intense ultrasonic clicks do not elicit any detectable anti–predator behaviour in L. pealeii and that clicks with received levels up to 226 dB re 1 μPa (pp) do not acoustically debilitate this cephalopod species.

[1]  M. Moynihan.  Why are Cephalopods Deaf? , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Kenneth S. Norris,et al.  Can Odontocetes Debilitate Prey with Sound? , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[3]  H. Bleckmann,et al.  A lateral line analogue in cephalopods: water waves generate microphonic potentials in the epidermal head lines ofSepia andLolliguncula , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[4]  N Shashar,et al.  An ethogram of body patterning behavior in the biomedically and commercially valuable squid Loligo pealei off Cape Cod, Massachusetts. , 1999, The Biological bulletin.

[5]  G. Dyke,et al.  A fossil brain from the Cretaceous of European Russia and avian sensory evolution , 2007, Biology Letters.

[6]  R. Hanlon.  Why Cephalopods are Probably Not "Deaf" , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[7]  David A. Mann,et al.  Response of clupeid fish to ultrasound: a review , 2004 .

[8]  P. Madsen,et al.  The monopulsed nature of sperm whale clicks. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  A. Packard,et al.  Low frequency hearing in cephalopods , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  N. Shashar,et al.  Aspects of the Sensory Ecology of Cephalopods , 2003 .

[11]  L. Miller,et al.  How Some Insects Detect and Avoid Being Eaten by Bats: Tactics and Countertactics of Prey and Predator , 2001 .

[12]  R. S. Mackay,et al.  DEBILITATION OF PREY BY INTENSE SOUNDS , 1988 .

[13]  P. Tyack,et al.  Biosonar performance of foraging beaked whales (Mesoplodon densirostris) , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  Christopher P Benton,et al.  Fractal rotation isolates mechanisms for form-dependent motion in human vision , 2007, Biology Letters.

[15]  M. Clarke.  CEPHALOPODS AS PREY. III. CETACEANS , 1996 .