Medication administration quality and health information technology: a national study of US hospitals.

OBJECTIVE To determine whether the use of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and electronic medication administration records (eMAR) is associated with better quality of medication administration at medium-to-large acute-care hospitals. DATA/STUDY SETTING: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of data from three sources: CPOE/eMAR usage from HIMSS Analytics (2010), medication quality scores from CMS Hospital Compare (2010), and hospital characteristics from CMS Acute Inpatient Prospective Payment System (2009). The analysis focused on 11 quality indicators (January-December 2009) at 2603 medium-to-large (≥ 100 beds), non-federal acute-care hospitals measuring proportion of eligible patients given (or prescribed) recommended medications for conditions, including acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia, and surgical care improvement. Using technology adoption by 2008 as reference, hospitals were coded: (1) eMAR-only adopters (n=986); (2) CPOE-only adopters (n=115); and (3) adopters of both technologies (n=804); with non-adopters of both technologies as reference group (n=698). Hospitals were also coded for duration of use in 2-year increments since technology adoption. Hospital characteristics, historical measure-specific patient volume, and propensity scores for technology adoption were used to control for confounding factors. The analysis was performed using a generalized linear model (logit link and binomial family). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Relative to non-adopters of both eMAR and CPOE, the odds of adherence to all measures (except one) were higher by 14-29% for eMAR-only hospitals and by 13-38% for hospitals with both technologies, translating to a marginal increase of 0.4-2.0 percentage points. Further, each additional 2 years of technology use was associated with 6-15% higher odds of compliance on all medication measures for eMAR-only hospitals and users of both technologies. CONCLUSIONS Implementation and duration of use of health information technologies are associated with improved adherence to medication guidelines at US hospitals. The benefits are evident for adoption of eMAR systems alone and in combination with CPOE.

[1]  R. Kane,et al.  Just what the doctor ordered. Review of the evidence of the impact of computerized physician order entry system on medication errors. , 2007, Health services research.

[2]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative. , 2001, Surgery.

[3]  Sowmya R. Rao,et al.  Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  D. Bates,et al.  Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. , 1998, JAMA.

[5]  Thomas H. Payne,et al.  Review Paper: Medication-related Clinical Decision Support in Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems: A Review , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  A. Jha,et al.  The Association Between Hospital Volume and Processes, Outcomes, and Costs of Care for Congestive Heart Failure , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  D. Rubin,et al.  Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score , 1984 .

[8]  Craig E. Kuziemsky,et al.  A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  P. Rosenbaum,et al.  The Hospital Compare mortality model and the volume-outcome relationship. , 2010, Health services research.

[10]  Feliciano B. Yu,et al.  Do "most wired" hospitals deliver better care? , 2007, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[11]  Thomas T H Wan,et al.  Factors Influencing Health Information System Adoption in American Hospitals , 2005, Health care management review.

[12]  Amalia R. Miller,et al.  Encryption and the Loss of Patient Data , 2011, Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management].

[13]  J. Graham,et al.  How Many Imputations are Really Needed? Some Practical Clarifications of Multiple Imputation Theory , 2007, Prevention Science.

[14]  David W Bates,et al.  The effects of health information technology on inpatient care. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  Z. Ren,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Relations Between Hospital Volume, Teaching Status, and Service Quality , 2011 .

[16]  M. Diana,et al.  An assessment of Health Care Information and Management Systems Society and Leapfrog data on computerized provider order entry. , 2011, Health services research.

[17]  E. Scott Geller,et al.  Impact of electronic prescribing in a hospital setting: A process-focused evaluation , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[18]  Sara Rosenbaum,et al.  Electronic health records' limited successes suggest more targeted uses. , 2010, Health affairs.

[19]  P. Aspden,et al.  Preventing Medication Errors , 2007 .

[20]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  Information technology comes to medicine. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Erol A. Peköz,et al.  Estimating a Composite Measure of Hospital Quality From the Hospital Compare Database: Differences When Using a Bayesian Hierarchical Latent Variable Model Versus Denominator-Based Weights , 2008, Medical care.

[22]  David W Bates,et al.  CPOE and clinical decision support in hospitals: getting the benefits: comment on "Unintended effects of a computerized physician order entry nearly hard-stop alert to prevent a drug interaction". , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[23]  David Newman,et al.  Testing Consumers' Comprehension of Quality Measures Using Alternative Reporting Formats , 2007, Health care financing review.

[24]  C. Anandan,et al.  The Impact of eHealth on the Quality and Safety of Health Care: A Systematic Overview , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[25]  Donald Rubin,et al.  Estimating Causal Effects from Large Data Sets Using Propensity Scores , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[26]  Yasar A Ozcan,et al.  Do Hospitals With Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) Provide Higher Quality Care? , 2008, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[27]  Jonathan A. Zlabek,et al.  Early cost and safety benefits of an inpatient electronic health record , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[28]  A. Jha,et al.  Care in U.S. HospitalsThe Hospital Quality Alliance Program , 2005 .

[29]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. , 2011, Health affairs.

[30]  David W Bates,et al.  Meaningful Use of Computerized Prescriber Order Entry , 2010, Journal of patient safety.

[31]  R. Van Horn,et al.  Valuing Hospital Investment in Information Technology: Does Governance Make a Difference? , 2006, Health care financing review.

[32]  Roger Taylor,et al.  The State and Pattern of Health Information Technology Adoption , 2005 .

[33]  A. Egberts,et al.  The Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry on Medication Prescription Errors and Clinical Outcome in Pediatric and Intensive Care: A Systematic Review , 2009, Pediatrics.

[34]  A. Jha,et al.  Electronic health record functions differ between best and worst hospitals. , 2011, The American journal of managed care.

[35]  T. S. Raghu,et al.  Adoption of health information technology for medication safety in U.S. Hospitals, 2006. , 2008, Health affairs.

[36]  T. S. Raghu,et al.  Electronic medical records, nurse staffing, and nurse-sensitive patient outcomes: evidence from California hospitals, 1998-2007. , 2010, Health services research.

[37]  Mark L. Diana,et al.  Hospital computerized provider order entry adoption and quality: An examination of the United States. , 2011, Health care management review.

[38]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[39]  Jeffrey S McCullough,et al.  The adoption of hospital information systems. , 2008, Health economics.

[40]  M. Elliott,et al.  Characteristics of Hospitals Demonstrating Superior Performance in Patient Experience and Clinical Process Measures of Care , 2010, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[41]  Michael F Furukawa,et al.  Electronic Medical Records and the Efficiency of Hospital Emergency Departments , 2011, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[42]  F. Federico,et al.  Preventing medication errors. , 2000, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[43]  C. DesRoches,et al.  A progress report on electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. , 2010, Health affairs.

[44]  A. Localio,et al.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. , 2005 .

[45]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[46]  A. Jha,et al.  Does the Leapfrog program help identify high-quality hospitals? , 2008, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[47]  Charles E. Leonard,et al.  Unintended effects of a computerized physician order entry nearly hard-stop alert to prevent a drug interaction: a randomized controlled trial. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[48]  C. Goldzweig,et al.  Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature. , 2009, Health affairs.

[49]  R. Wears,et al.  Computer technology and clinical work: still waiting for Godot. , 2005, JAMA.

[50]  Nicolette de Keizer,et al.  The impact of computerized physician medication order entry in hospitalized patients - A systematic review , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[51]  Yasar A. Ozcan,et al.  Electronic medical record use and efficiency: A DEA and windows analysis of hospitals , 2009 .

[52]  Feliciano B. Yu,et al.  Full Implementation of Computerized Physician Order Entry and Medication-Related Quality Outcomes: A Study of 3364 Hospitals , 2009, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[53]  Steffie Woolhandler,et al.  Hospital computing and the costs and quality of care: a national study. , 2010, The American journal of medicine.

[54]  Michael I. Harrison,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Unintended Consequences of Information Technologies in Health Care - An Interactive Sociotechnical Analysis , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[55]  Jennifer Lai,et al.  Unintended Consequences of Information Technologies in Health Care—An Interactive Sociotechnical Analysis , 2007 .

[56]  A. Jha,et al.  Care in U.S. hospitals--the Hospital Quality Alliance program. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[57]  J. McCullough,et al.  The effect of health information technology on quality in U.S. hospitals. , 2010, Health affairs.

[58]  Spencer S Jones,et al.  Electronic health record adoption and quality improvement in US hospitals. , 2010, The American journal of managed care.