Three-dimensional laser imaging for rock mass characterization

Three-dimensional (3D) laser imaging has recently emerged as a tool for rock mass characterization. An image is composed of millions of 3D points which are collectively termed point cloud data. Each image is a digital representation of the rock face containing information for rock mass characterization. The objective of this research project was to (1) measure joint orientation and (2) surface roughness from 3D data. The third objective was to (3) remove the obstructive wire mesh from 3D data. In an above ground field trial, joint orientation was measured using two methods: a 2.5D method using a triangular irregular network and a 3D pole density contouring method using a fully 3D triangular surface discretization model. In each method, the normal vector of each triangle was used to determine the strike and dip. The fully automated 3D method was very accurate in a validation test against manual measurements. The effect of image resolution, triangle size, and joint face geometry were also assessed. In an underground field trail, surface roughness was measured from point cloud data using principal component analysis (PCA). For geo-referencing, joint orientation was first measured using the normal vector from the PCA best fit plane. A 2D surface profile was generated and the maximum asperity amplitude was measured to estimate the Joint Roughness Coefficient. The methodology was successfully validated against manual measurements and applied to generate a surface roughness map from the entire image. Surface roughness anisotropy was also evaluated. In underground mining, support elements such as wire mesh are imaged in front of the rock face. Two filters were developed to remove the wire mesh. The first was based on the instrument noise, measured in-situ from rockbolt face plates, and an estimate of the maximum asperity amplitude. The second was based on the amplitude distance of each point from the PCA best fit plane. In a third field trial, these filters were applied with success. For joint orientation, the presence of wire mesh had minimal impact. Once removed, surface roughness measurements were successfully made using the same methodology as in the previous field trial. Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the valuable contributions of several individuals. I am most grateful for my supervisor and mentor, Dr. Claire Samson, Chair of the Department of Earth Sciences at Carleton University, for her academic advice, encouragement, and friendship. All of which were invaluable during this thesis program. At the same time, I express sincere gratitude to my co-supervisor, Dr. Steve McKinnon, of Queen's University, for his guidance, support, and technical expertise. I give thanks to Dr. Denis Thibodeau, of Vale, for sponsoring my thesis program and providing access to Vale mining operations. I would like to thank the staff at the 175 Orebody mine (Sudbury, Ontario) and the T1 nickel mine (Thompson, Manitoba) for their assistance and support during my field trials. This research would not be possible if not for the generous donations from Vale. I would like to thank Neptec Design Group for providing the laser scanner and support equipment. I would also like to acknowledge the staff at Neptec for sharing their expertise in image processing and analysis. I gratefully acknowledge the entire Earth Sciences department at Carleton University for their support. Thanks to the graduate students past and present. Last but not least, I would like to express my deepest thanks to my family and friends for their encouragement and patience throughout my academic studies.

[1]  Derek D. Lichti Terrestrial laser scanner self-calibration: Correlation sources and their mitigation , 2010 .

[2]  Robert E. Kayen,et al.  Applicability of terrestrial LIDAR scanning for scientific studies in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona , 2006 .

[3]  S. Buckley,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning in geology: data acquisition, processing and accuracy considerations , 2008, Journal of the Geological Society.

[4]  Francois Blais,et al.  Neptec 3D Laser Camera System: from space mission STS-105 to terrestrial applications , 2002 .

[5]  Thomas P. Kersten,et al.  Methods for Geometric Accuracy Investigations of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Systems , 2009 .

[6]  Giovanni Grasselli,et al.  A method to evaluate the three-dimensional roughness of fracture surfaces in brittle geomaterials. , 2009, The Review of scientific instruments.

[7]  D. J. Hutchinson,et al.  Bias Correction for View-limited Lidar Scanning of Rock Outcrops for Structural Characterization , 2010 .

[8]  Nigel H. Woodcock The Accuracy of Structural Field Measurements , 1976, The Journal of Geology.

[9]  Adam Deslauriers,et al.  Measuring the bulk density of meteorites nondestructively using three-dimensional laser imaging , 2006 .

[10]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  On-the-job detection and correction of systematic cyclic distance measurement errors of terrestrial laser scanners , 2008 .

[11]  Denis Thibodeau,et al.  3D laser imaging for surface roughness analysis , 2013 .

[12]  Kourosh Khoshelham,et al.  Evaluation of a LIDAR Land-Based Mobile Mapping System for Monitoring Sandy Coasts , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[13]  N. Barton,et al.  The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice , 1977 .

[14]  Robert Hack,et al.  Deriving roughness characteristics of rock mass discontinuities from terrestrial laser scan data , 2006 .

[15]  M. Menenti,et al.  Influence of range measurement noise on roughness characterization of rock surfaces using terrestrial laser scanning , 2011 .

[16]  Erik Eberhardt,et al.  The use of LiDAR to overcome rock slope hazard data collection challenges at Afternoon Creek, Washington , 2006 .

[17]  Ove Stephansson,et al.  Application of a new in situ 3D laser scanner to study the scale effect on the rock joint surface roughness , 2004 .

[18]  G. Grasselli,et al.  A new 2D discontinuity roughness parameter and its correlation with JRC , 2010 .

[19]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[20]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  Incidence angle influence on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points , 2009 .

[21]  R. Fisher Dispersion on a sphere , 1953, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[22]  Z. Bieniawski Engineering rock mass classifications , 1989 .

[23]  M Rioux,et al.  Laser range finder based on synchronized scanners. , 1984, Applied optics.

[24]  Nick Barton,et al.  Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support , 1974 .

[25]  Stephen D. McKinnon,et al.  3D laser imaging for joint orientation analysis , 2011 .

[26]  G. Gauthier,et al.  Chronology of transpression, magmatism, and sedimentation in the Thompson Nickel Belt(Manitoba, Canada) and timing of Trans-Hudson Orogen - Superior Province collision , 2011 .

[27]  D. Stead,et al.  Close-range terrestrial digital photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning for discontinuity characterization on rock cuts , 2009 .

[28]  Mark S. Diederichs,et al.  Optimization of LiDAR scanning and processing for automated structural evaluation of discontinuities in rockmasses , 2009 .

[29]  Claire Samson,et al.  Triangulation-based 3D laser imaging for underground rock mass characterization: Impact of operational parameters , 2008 .

[30]  Yuriy Reshetyuk A unified approach to self-calibration of terrestrial laser scanners , 2010 .

[31]  Mark S. Diederichs,et al.  Characterizing block geometry in jointed rockmasses , 2006 .

[32]  Jerry P. Fairley,et al.  Estimating surface roughness of terrestrial laser scan data using orthogonal distance regression , 2011 .

[33]  Alexandre Brouste,et al.  Characterization of Fault Roughness at Various Scales: Implications of Three-Dimensional High Resolution Topography Measurements , 2008, 0810.1109.

[34]  Nick Barton,et al.  Review of a new shear-strength criterion for rock joints , 1973 .

[35]  S. Slob,et al.  Identification and characterisation of rock mass discontinuity sets using 3D laser scanning , 2006 .

[36]  Mostafa Sharifzadeh,et al.  Analysis of Aperture Evolution in a Rock Joint Using a Complex Network Approach , 2008, ArXiv.

[37]  O. Fernández,et al.  Obtaining a best fitting plane through 3D georeferenced data , 2005 .

[38]  E. Hoek,et al.  Rock slope engineering , 1974 .

[39]  Mariusz MŁynarczuk,et al.  Description and classification of rock surfaces by means of laser profilometry and mathematical morphology , 2010 .

[40]  François Blais Review of 20 years of range sensor development , 2004, J. Electronic Imaging.

[41]  Gianfranco Forlani,et al.  Advanced Geostructural Survey Methods Applied to Rock Mass Characterization , 2009 .

[42]  D. Crandall,et al.  Numerical simulations examining the relationship between wall-roughness and fluid flow in rock fractures , 2010 .