Proposed Mobility Assessments with Simultaneous Full-Body Inertial Measurement Units and Optical Motion Capture in Healthy Adults and Neurological Patients for Future Validation Studies: Study Protocol

Healthy adults and neurological patients show unique mobility patterns over the course of their lifespan and disease. Quantifying these mobility patterns could support diagnosing, tracking disease progression and measuring response to treatment. This quantification can be done with wearable technology, such as inertial measurement units (IMUs). Before IMUs can be used to quantify mobility, algorithms need to be developed and validated with age and disease-specific datasets. This study proposes a protocol for a dataset that can be used to develop and validate IMU-based mobility algorithms for healthy adults (18–60 years), healthy older adults (>60 years), and patients with Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, a symptomatic stroke and chronic low back pain. All participants will be measured simultaneously with IMUs and a 3D optical motion capture system while performing standardized mobility tasks and non-standardized activities of daily living. Specific clinical scales and questionnaires will be collected. This study aims at building the largest dataset for the development and validation of IMU-based mobility algorithms for healthy adults and neurological patients. It is anticipated to provide this dataset for further research use and collaboration, with the ultimate goal to bring IMU-based mobility algorithms as quickly as possible into clinical trials and clinical routine.

[1]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[2]  S. Morrow Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale , 1999 .

[3]  Hartmut Witte,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  R. Deyo,et al.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  A. Doty,et al.  The reliability and validity of the Timed Up and Go as a clinical tool in individuals with and without disabilities across a lifespan: a systematic review , 2019, Disability and rehabilitation.

[6]  Rgn Pgce Amelia Williamson MSc,et al.  Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales , 2005 .

[7]  Kenneth McIsaac,et al.  Towards remote monitoring of Parkinson’s disease tremor using wearable motion capture systems , 2018, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[8]  Rachid Aissaoui,et al.  Inertial motion capture validation of 3D knee kinematics at various gait speed on the treadmill with a double-pose calibration. , 2020, Gait & posture.

[9]  Bastiaan R. Bloem,et al.  The clinical approach to movement disorders , 2010, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[10]  Günther Deuschl,et al.  Split-belt locomotion in Parkinson's disease links asymmetry, dyscoordination and sequence effect. , 2016, Gait & posture.

[11]  R. Baron,et al.  Validation of the Questionnaire for Symptom Assessment in Pain disorders for Back pain patients (Q‐SAP) , 2020, European journal of pain.

[12]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Long-term unsupervised mobility assessment in movement disorders , 2020, The Lancet Neurology.

[14]  J. Jankovic,et al.  Movement Disorder Society‐sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS‐UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results , 2008, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[15]  Ying-Chih Wang,et al.  Sit-to-stand test: Performance and determinants across the age-span. , 2010, Isokinetics and exercise science.

[16]  Noriaki Ichihashi,et al.  Older adults at high risk of falling need more time for anticipatory postural adjustment in the precrossing phase of obstacle negotiation. , 2011, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[17]  R. Schwarzer,et al.  The General Self-Efficacy Scale: Multicultural Validation Studies , 2005, The Journal of psychology.

[18]  W. Gibb,et al.  The relevance of the Lewy body to the pathogenesis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  Short Physical Performance Battery and all-cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, BMC Medicine.

[20]  J. Kurtzke Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[21]  Greydon Gilmore,et al.  Using Wearable Technology to Generate Objective Parkinson’s Disease Dyskinesia Severity Score: Possibilities for Home Monitoring , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[22]  C. Blake,et al.  The Influence of a Cognitive Dual Task on the Gait Parameters of Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2017, Journal of aging and physical activity.

[23]  C. Lamoth,et al.  Gait stability and variability measures show effects of impaired cognition and dual tasking in frail people , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[24]  J. Cummings,et al.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[25]  M. Montero‐Odasso,et al.  Obstacle Negotiation, Gait Variability and Risk of Falling. Results from "Gait and Brain Study". , 2018, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[26]  Jay R Hoffman,et al.  Agreement of Gait Events Detection during Treadmill Backward Walking by Kinematic Data and Inertial Motion Units , 2020, Sensors.

[27]  S. Bhattacharjee,et al.  Continuous leg dyskinesia assessment in Parkinson's disease –clinical validity and ecological effect , 2016 .

[28]  M. Hoehn,et al.  Parkinsonism , 1967, Neurology.

[29]  Christian Larue,et al.  Accuracy and repeatability of single-pose calibration of inertial measurement units for whole-body motion analysis. , 2017, Gait & posture.

[30]  Lynn Rochester,et al.  Selecting Clinically Relevant Gait Characteristics for Classification of Early Parkinson’s Disease: A Comprehensive Machine Learning Approach , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[31]  P. Vidal,et al.  Wearable inertial sensors provide reliable biomarkers of disease severity in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2020, Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[32]  J. Larsen,et al.  Measuring fatigue in patients with Parkinson's disease – the Fatigue Severity Scale , 2002, European journal of neurology.

[33]  T. Kohlmann,et al.  Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature , 2020, Quality of Life Research.

[34]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  SARC‐F: a symptom score to predict persons with sarcopenia at risk for poor functional outcomes , 2015, Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle.

[35]  L. Rochester,et al.  Modernizing Daily Function Assessment in Parkinson's Disease Using Capacity, Perception, and Performance Measures , 2020, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[36]  C. Faria,et al.  Assessing Timed Up and Go in Parkinson's disease: Reliability and validity of Timed Up and Go Assessment of biomechanical strategies. , 2017, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[37]  Marco Schieppati,et al.  Abnormal gait pattern emerges during curved trajectories in high-functioning Parkinsonian patients walking in line at normal speed , 2018, PloS one.

[38]  Christian Larue,et al.  Validation of inertial measurement units with an optoelectronic system for whole-body motion analysis , 2017, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[39]  B. Kladny,et al.  Der Funktionsfragebogen Hannover (FFbH) und die Subskala „körperliche Funktionsfähigkeit” aus dem SF-36 im Vergleich , 2001 .

[40]  T. Bhatt,et al.  Effect of type of cognitive task and walking speed on cognitive-motor interference during dual-task walking , 2014, Neuroscience.

[41]  Martina Mancini,et al.  Levodopa Is a Double‐Edged Sword for Balance and Gait in People With Parkinson's Disease , 2015, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[42]  J. Winkler,et al.  Gait and Cognition in Parkinson’s Disease: Cognitive Impairment Is Inadequately Reflected by Gait Performance during Dual Task , 2017, Front. Neurol..

[43]  Leonard A Kaminsky,et al.  Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure , 2017, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[44]  J H van Dieën,et al.  Estimating 3D L5/S1 moments and ground reaction forces during trunk bending using a full-body ambulatory inertial motion capture system. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[45]  Matthew P Mavor,et al.  Validation of an IMU Suit for Military-Based Tasks , 2020, Sensors.

[46]  Jochen Klucken,et al.  A clinical view on the development of technology‐based tools in managing Parkinson's disease , 2016, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[47]  M. Mancini,et al.  Validity of Mobility Lab (version 2) for gait assessment in young adults, older adults and Parkinson’s disease , 2019, Physiological measurement.

[48]  C. Mazzà,et al.  Upper body accelerations as a biomarker of gait impairment in the early stages of Parkinson's disease. , 2019, Gait & posture.

[49]  Bartosz Kochański,et al.  The Effect of Two Different Cognitive Tests on Gait Parameters during Dual Tasks in Healthy Postmenopausal Women , 2016, BioMed research international.

[50]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[51]  A. Berthoz,et al.  The “Stroop Walking Task”: An innovative dual-task for the early detection of executive function impairment , 2015, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[52]  Manuel Schabus,et al.  About the Accuracy and Problems of Consumer Devices in the Assessment of Sleep , 2019, Sensors.

[53]  David H. Miller,et al.  Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria , 2017, The Lancet Neurology.

[54]  P. Schmitz,et al.  Sensory exam with a quantitative tuning fork: Rapid, sensitive and predictive of SNAP amplitude , 2004, Neurology.

[55]  Beatrix Vereijken,et al.  A Physical Activity Reference Data-Set Recorded from Older Adults Using Body-Worn Inertial Sensors and Video Technology—The ADAPT Study Data-Set , 2017, Sensors.

[56]  Stefano Pastorelli,et al.  Wearable Inertial Sensors to Assess Standing Balance: A Systematic Review , 2019, Sensors.

[57]  C. Voelcker-Rehage,et al.  Influence of a visual–verbal Stroop test on standing and walking performance of older adults , 2016, Neuroscience.

[58]  B. Bloem,et al.  Determinants of Dual-Task Training Effect Size in Parkinson Disease: Who Will Benefit Most? , 2019, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[59]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Postural transitions detection and characterization in healthy and patient populations using a single waist sensor , 2020, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.