Association of baseline levels of markers of bone and cartilage degradation with long-term progression of joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: the COBRA study.

OBJECTIVE The known risk factors for radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are not optimally discriminative in patients with early disease who do not have evidence of radiologic damage. We sought to determine whether urinary C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I (CTX-I) and type II (CTX-II) collagen (markers of bone and cartilage destruction, respectively) are associated with long-term radiologic progression in patients with early RA. METHODS This was a prospective study of 110 patients with early RA who were participating in the COBRA (Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoïde Artritis) clinical trial and followup study, a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of oral pulse prednisolone, methotrexate, plus sulfasalazine with sulfasalazine alone. We investigated the relationship between baseline levels of urinary CTX-I and CTX-II and the mean annual progression of joint destruction over a median of 4 years, as measured by changes in the modified Sharp score (average of 2 independent readers). RESULTS In multivariate logistic regression analysis, baseline urinary CTX-I and CTX-II levels in the highest tertile were the strongest predictors of radiologic progression (Sharp score increase >2 units/year; odds ratio 7.9 and 11.2, respectively), independently of treatment group, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, rheumatoid factor (RF), and baseline joint damage (Sharp score). The likelihood ratios for a positive test were 3.8 and 8.0 for CTX-I and CTX-II, respectively, which compared favorably with the likelihood ratios for the ESR (3.0), baseline joint damage (1.6), and RF (1.8). When patients were grouped according to the presence (Sharp score >/=4, n = 49) and absence (Sharp score <4, n = 61) of joint damage at baseline, CTX-I and CTX-II levels were predictive only in those without baseline joint damage (odds ratio 14.9 and 25.7, respectively). CONCLUSION High baseline levels of urinary CTX-I and CTX-II independently predict an increased risk of radiologic progression over 4 years in patients with early RA, especially those without radiologic joint damage. Urinary CTX-I and CTX-II may be useful for identifying individual RA patients at high risk of progression very early in the disease, before erosions can be detected radiographically. Such patients may be in special need of treatments that inhibit bone and cartilage degradation.

[1]  Rene Westhovens,et al.  COBRA combination therapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: long-term structural benefits of a brief intervention. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[2]  B. Bresnihan,et al.  Early joint erosions and serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase 1, matrix metalloproteinase 3, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  B. Dijkmans,et al.  Predictors of radiographic joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis , 2001, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[4]  P. Qvist,et al.  Collagen type II C-telopeptide fragments as an index of cartilage degradation. , 2001, Bone.

[5]  M. Dougados,et al.  Prognostic factors for radiographic damage in early rheumatoid arthritis: a multiparameter prospective study. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[6]  N. Kamatani,et al.  Activated human T cells directly induce osteoclastogenesis from human monocytes: possible role of T cells in bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis patients. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[7]  P. Geusens,et al.  Skewed T-cell receptor variable gene usage in the synovium of early and chronic rheumatoid arthritis patients and persistence of clonally expanded T cells in a chronic patient. , 2000, Rheumatology.

[8]  E C Coles,et al.  Relationship between time-integrated C-reactive protein levels and radiologic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 2000, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  P. Delmas,et al.  Molecular basis and clinical use of biochemical markers of bone, cartilage, and synovium in joint diseases. , 2000, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  H K Genant,et al.  Assessment of rheumatoid arthritis using a modified scoring method on digitized and original radiographs. , 1998, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[11]  S. van der Linden,et al.  Randomised comparison of combined step-down prednisolone, methotrexate and sulphasalazine with sulphasalazine alone in early rheumatoid arthritis , 1997, The Lancet.

[12]  D. Bauer,et al.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis , 2013, Marcus and Feldman's Osteoporosis.

[13]  L. Marks Economics and maternal health A Susan Williams Women and Childbirth in the Twentieth Century , 1997, The Lancet.

[14]  J. Kirwan The relationship between synovitis and erosions in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1997, British journal of rheumatology.

[15]  B. Bresnihan,et al.  Clinical improvement and radiological deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence that the pathogenesis of synovial inflammation and articular erosion may differ. , 1996, British journal of rheumatology.

[16]  P. Delmas,et al.  Increased bone turnover in late postmenopausal women is a major determinant of osteoporosis , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  P. Emery,et al.  Early rheumatoid arthritis: time to aim for remission? , 1995, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[18]  A. van der Heide,et al.  Prediction of progression of radiologic damage in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[19]  L. Klareskog,et al.  Immunopathogenesis and immunotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: an area in transition , 1995, Journal of internal medicine.

[20]  F. Breedveld,et al.  T cell receptors in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[21]  C. Christiansen,et al.  Immunoassay for quantifying type I collagen degradation products in urine evaluated. , 1994, Clinical chemistry.

[22]  M. V. van Leeuwen,et al.  PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR RADIOGRAPHIC DAMAGE AND PHYSICAL DISABILITY IN EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. A PROSPECTIVE FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF 147 PATIENTS , 1992 .

[23]  F. Epstein,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis. Pathophysiology and implications for therapy. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  F. Arnett Revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1990, Orthopedic nursing.

[25]  Sharp Jt Radiologic assessment as an outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1989 .

[26]  T. Möttönen,et al.  Prediction of erosiveness and rate of development of new erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[27]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[28]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[29]  A. Masi,et al.  Prognosis in rheumatoid arthritis. A longitudinal study of newly diagnosed younger adult patients. , 1979, The American journal of medicine.

[30]  J. Moreland,et al.  Methods of scoring the progression of radiologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis. Correlation of radiologic, clinical and laboratory abnormalities. , 1971, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[31]  P. Delmas,et al.  Association of baseline levels of urinary glucosyl-galactosyl-pyridinoline and type II collagen C-telopeptide with progression of joint destruction in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[32]  M. Prevoo,et al.  Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.