Effects of Temporal Modulation on Crowding, Visual Span, and Reading

Purpose Crowding, the increased difficulty in recognizing a target due to the proximity of adjacent objects, is identified as the main sensory constraint for the size of the visual span (the number of letters recognized without moving the eyes) and reading speed in peripheral vision. The goal of the present study is to assess the impact of temporal modulation on crowding, visual span, and reading in the periphery. Methods Six normally sighted young adults participated in the study. Four temporal modulation patterns were examined: (1) moving scotoma (sequentially masking the component letters in a letter string or word), (2) moving window (sequentially presenting the component letters), (3) flashing (repeatedly masking and presenting all letters simultaneously), and (4) static (the control condition; no temporal changes during the presentation). For each condition, we obtained the spatial extent of crowding, the size of the visual span, and reading speeds measured by the rapid serial visual presentation method. Results Compared with the static condition, the spatial extent of crowding was reduced in the moving window condition. Both the moving window and moving scotoma conditions led to a faster reading speed for print sizes smaller than critical print size (the smallest print size that allows maximum reading speed). However, none of the temporal modulations increased the size of the visual span and reading speed for print sizes larger than critical print size. Conclusions The results suggest that the temporal modulation patterns are of limited benefit for peripheral reading despite the substantial improvement for slow reading when print size is close to acuity threshold.

[1]  G E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. Clinical predictors of low-vision reading speed. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  J. Stephen Mansfield,et al.  Contrast polarity differences reduce crowding but do not benefit reading performance in peripheral vision , 2009, Vision Research.

[3]  Gary S. Rubin,et al.  Reading without saccadic eye movements , 1992, Vision Research.

[4]  S. Klein,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[5]  D. Levi,et al.  The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[6]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size , 2002, Vision Research.

[7]  R A Schuchard,et al.  Relative locations of macular scotomas near the PRL: effect on low vision reading. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[8]  G. Legge,et al.  Mr. Chips 2002: new insights from an ideal-observer model of reading , 2002, Vision Research.

[9]  Benita J. O’Colmain,et al.  Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[11]  A. Healy,et al.  A developmental evaluation of the role of word shape in word recognition , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[12]  A. Huckauf,et al.  On the relations between crowding and visual masking , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  I L Bailey,et al.  Reading and eye movements in age-related maculopathy. , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[14]  Robert W. Massof,et al.  Racial variations in causes of vision loss in nursing homes: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation in Nursing Home Groups (SEEING) Study. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  Christopher D. Chambers,et al.  The role of feedback to foveal cortex in peripheral perception: ATMS study , 2010 .

[16]  N. Rumney,et al.  Why do low-vision patients still read slowly with a low-vision aid? , 1991 .

[17]  A F Monk,et al.  Errors in proofreading: Evidence for the use of word shape in word recognition , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Tatjana A. Nazir,et al.  Effects of lateral masking and spatial precueing on gap-resolution in central and peripheral vision , 1992, Vision Research.

[19]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—II. Low vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[20]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Crowding is reduced by onset transients in the target object (but not in the flankers). , 2014, Journal of vision.

[21]  J. Pynte,et al.  Word-shape and word-lexical-frequency effects in lexical-decision and naming tasks , 2003 .

[22]  Deyue Yu,et al.  Sensory and cognitive influences on the training-related improvement of reading speed in peripheral vision. , 2013, Journal of Vision.

[23]  Claus Bundesen,et al.  Single-letter recognition as a function of exposure duration , 1999 .

[24]  Gary S. Rubin,et al.  The Role of Eye Movements During Reading in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) , 2009 .

[25]  Geoffrey Underwood,et al.  Word shape, orthographic regularity, and contextual interactions in a reading task , 1982, Cognition.

[26]  Sing-Hang Cheung,et al.  The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[27]  E. Pellicano,et al.  The effects of grouping on speed discrimination thresholds in adults, typically developing children, and children with autism. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[28]  Redha Taïar,et al.  Visualizations of the flow around a swimmer in turbulent regime , 2011, J. Vis..

[29]  G. Legge,et al.  PSYCHOPHYSICS OF READING : IX . THE STABILITY OF EYE POSITION IN NORMAL AND LOW VISION , 2002 .

[30]  D. Levi,et al.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  P. Jong Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. , 2004 .

[32]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of Reading in Normal and Low Vision , 2006 .

[33]  Tracey D. Berger,et al.  Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[34]  Susana T. L. Chung The effect of letter spacing on reading speed in central and peripheral vision. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  Gary S. Rubin,et al.  Eye movements and reading in macular disease: Further support for the shrinking perceptual span hypothesis , 2006, Vision Research.

[36]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision , 1997, Vision Research.

[37]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[38]  Jesse S. Husk,et al.  The effect of motion on crowding: zooming text. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[39]  Sing-Hang Cheung,et al.  Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[40]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[41]  Edward Awh,et al.  Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays? , 2007, Journal of vision.

[42]  G. Legge,et al.  Comparing reading speed for horizontal and vertical English text. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[43]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[44]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[45]  Deyue Yu,et al.  Sensory factors limiting horizontal and vertical visual span for letter recognition. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[46]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of crowding , 2001, Vision Research.

[47]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Does print size matter for reading? A review of findings from vision science and typography. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[48]  D. Pelli,et al.  Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.