Physical characteristics and mechanical properties of a sustainable lightweight geopolymer based self-compacting concrete with expanded clay aggregates

[1]  N. Anand,et al.  Investigation on engineering properties and micro-structure characteristics of low strength and high strength geopolymer composites subjected to standard temperature exposure , 2022, Case Studies in Construction Materials.

[2]  Balamurali Kanagaraj,et al.  Performance evaluation on engineering properties of sodium silicate binder as a precursor material for the development of cement-free concrete , 2022, Developments in the Built Environment.

[3]  Balamurali Kanagaraj,et al.  Performance evaluation of sodium silicate waste as a replacement for conventional sand in geopolymer concrete , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[4]  U. J. Alengaram,et al.  Performance evaluation on engineering properties and sustainability analysis of high strength geopolymer concrete , 2022, Journal of Building Engineering.

[5]  P. Pradhan,et al.  Factors affecting production and properties of self-compacting geopolymer concrete – A review , 2022, Construction and Building Materials.

[6]  H. Röder,et al.  Life Cylce Assessment (LCA) of Thermal Insulation Materials: A Critical Review , 2022, Cleaner Materials.

[7]  A. Peys,et al.  Sustainable iron-rich cements: Raw material sources and binder types , 2022, Cement and Concrete Research.

[8]  T. Donchev,et al.  Sustainability of alternative reinforcement for concrete structures: Life cycle assessment of basalt FRP bars , 2022, Construction and Building Materials.

[9]  Ming Liu,et al.  Physical and mechanical properties of expanded vermiculite (EV) embedded foam concrete subjected to elevated temperatures , 2022, Case Studies in Construction Materials.

[10]  T. Kiran,et al.  Exemplification of sustainable sodium silicate waste sediments as coarse aggregates in the performance evaluation of geopolymer concrete , 2022, Construction and Building Materials.

[11]  R. T. Toledo Filho,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and environmental sustainability of cementitious materials for 3D concrete printing: A systematic literature review , 2022, Journal of Building Engineering.

[12]  T. Kiran,et al.  Development and strength assessment of eco-friendly geopolymer concrete made with natural and recycled aggregates , 2022, Construction Innovation.

[13]  A. Audenaert,et al.  Revamping corrosion damaged reinforced concrete balconies: Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost of life-extending repair methods , 2022, Journal of Building Engineering.

[14]  A. Alqarni,et al.  A comprehensive review on properties of sustainable concrete using volcanic pumice powder ash as a supplementary cementitious material , 2022, Construction and Building Materials.

[15]  José Manuel Moreno-Maroto,et al.  Effect of the addition of organic wastes (cork powder, nut shell, coffee grounds and paper sludge) in clays to obtain expanded lightweight aggregates , 2022, Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Cerámica y Vidrio.

[16]  Wajahat Sammer Ansari,et al.  Lightweight concrete from a perspective of sustainable reuse of waste byproducts , 2022, Construction and Building Materials.

[17]  Rishi Gupta,et al.  Drying shrinkage properties of expanded polystyrene (EPS) lightweight aggregate concrete: A review , 2022, Case Studies in Construction Materials.

[18]  Vivian W. Y. Tam,et al.  Life cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete on its environmental impacts: A critical review , 2022, Construction and Building Materials.

[19]  M. Elchalakani,et al.  Mechanical performance and durability of geopolymer lightweight rubber concrete , 2022, Journal of Building Engineering.

[20]  D. Law,et al.  A new framework for assessing the environmental impacts of circular economy friendly soil waste-based geopolymer cements , 2021, Building and Environment.

[21]  Qingyuan Wang,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment and Impact Correlation Analysis of Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete , 2021, Materials.

[22]  J. Estaire,et al.  Lightweight expanded clay aggregate properties based on laboratory testing , 2021, Construction and Building Materials.

[23]  P. Ziehl,et al.  Energy and CO2 emission assessments of alkali-activated concrete and Ordinary Portland Cement concrete: A comparative analysis of different grades of concrete , 2021 .

[24]  A. Biçer.  The effect of fly ash and pine tree resin on thermo-mechanical properties of concretes with expanded clay aggregates , 2021 .

[25]  B. Gencturk,et al.  Optimized Self-Healing in concrete using engineered aggregates , 2021 .

[26]  R. Tan,et al.  Life cycle assessment of self-healing geopolymer concrete , 2021 .

[27]  M. Saberian,et al.  Shear strength and LCA of volcanic ash-based geopolymer and cement stabilized soil: a comparative study , 2021 .

[28]  I. Zafar,et al.  Plastic-based sustainable synthetic aggregate in Green Lightweight concrete – A review , 2021, Construction and Building Materials.

[29]  E. Ghorbel,et al.  Performance of metakaolin/slag-based geopolymer concrete made with recycled fine and coarse aggregates , 2021 .

[30]  M. K. Haridharan,et al.  Low-velocity impact response of novel prepacked expanded clay aggregate fibrous concrete produced with carbon nano tube, glass fiber mesh and steel fiber , 2021 .

[31]  Tse Guan Tan,et al.  Recycling food, agricultural, and industrial wastes as pore-forming agents for sustainable porous ceramic production: A review , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[32]  A. Kemény,et al.  Functional aluminium matrix syntactic foams filled with lightweight expanded clay aggregate particles , 2021 .

[33]  R. Al-Ameri,et al.  A newly developed self-compacting geopolymer concrete under ambient condition , 2021 .

[34]  Bassam A. Tayeh,et al.  Use of oil palm shell as an aggregate in cement concrete: A review , 2020 .

[35]  Muhammad Ekhlasur Rahman,et al.  Sustainable lightweight self-compacting concrete using oil palm shell and fly ash , 2020 .

[36]  S. Delvasto,et al.  Utilization of waste engine oil for expanded clay aggregate production and assessment of its influence on lightweight concrete properties , 2020 .

[37]  S. Ibrahim,et al.  Performance evaluation of palm oil clinker sand as replacement for conventional sand in geopolymer mortar , 2020 .

[38]  A. F. Angelin,et al.  Evaluation of efficiency factor of a self-compacting lightweight concrete with rubber and expanded clay contents , 2020 .

[39]  O. Gencel,et al.  Influence of expanded vermiculite powder and silica fume on properties of foam concretes , 2020 .

[40]  Pratanu Ghosh,et al.  Influence of pumice on mechanical properties and durability of high performance concrete , 2020 .

[41]  D. O. Oyejobi,et al.  Prediction of optimum compressive strength of light-weight concrete containing Nigerian palm kernel shells , 2020 .

[42]  Jianhe Xie,et al.  Study on the optimum initial curing condition for fly ash and GGBS based geopolymer recycled aggregate concrete , 2020 .

[43]  Jnyanendra Kumar Prusty,et al.  Multi-response optimization using Taguchi-Grey relational analysis for composition of fly ash-ground granulated blast furnace slag based geopolymer concrete , 2020 .

[44]  A. Akbarnezhad,et al.  Recycled geopolymer aggregates as coarse aggregates for Portland cement concrete and geopolymer concrete: Effects on mechanical properties , 2020 .

[45]  Dogan Kaya,et al.  Properties of fly ash-based lightweight geopolymer concrete prepared using pumice and expanded perlite as aggregates , 2020 .

[46]  A. H. Nahhab,et al.  Influence of content and maximum size of light expanded clay aggregate on the fresh, strength, and durability properties of self-compacting lightweight concrete reinforced with micro steel fibers , 2020 .

[47]  Hussein M. Hamada,et al.  The use of palm oil clinker as a sustainable construction material: A review , 2020 .

[48]  Jiaping Liu,et al.  Effect of foaming gas and cement type on the thermal conductivity of foamed concrete , 2020 .

[49]  C. Cai,et al.  Microstructure and microhardness property of the interface between a metakaolin/GGBFS-based geopolymer paste and granite aggregate , 2019, Construction and Building Materials.

[50]  Muhammad Riaz Ahmad,et al.  Experimental research on the performance of lightweight concrete containing foam and expanded clay aggregate , 2019, Composites Part B: Engineering.

[51]  M. Kohail,et al.  Performance of geopolymer concrete containing recycled rubber , 2019, Construction and Building Materials.

[52]  A. Mourad,et al.  Thermal and structural performance of geopolymer concrete containing phase change material encapsulated in expanded clay , 2019, Energy and Buildings.

[53]  Rui Rao,et al.  Effects of combined usage of GGBS and fly ash on workability and mechanical properties of alkali activated geopolymer concrete with recycled aggregate , 2019, Composites Part B: Engineering.

[54]  E. Badogiannis,et al.  Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of pumice lightweight concrete reinforced with steel and polypropylene fibers , 2019, Construction and Building Materials.

[55]  U. J. Alengaram,et al.  Assessment on engineering properties and CO2 emissions of recycled aggregate concrete incorporating waste products as supplements to Portland cement , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[56]  Jorge de Brito,et al.  Life cycle assessment of concrete made with high volume of recycled concrete aggregates and fly ash , 2018, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[57]  John L. Provis,et al.  Alkali-activated materials , 2018, Cement and Concrete Research.

[58]  Angel D. Ramirez,et al.  Life cycle assessment of geopolymer concrete , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[59]  Prinya Chindaprasirt,et al.  Use of crushed clay brick and pumice aggregates in lightweight geopolymer concrete , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[60]  N. Shafiq,et al.  Investigating the effects of solarcure curing method on the compressive strength, microstructure and polymeric reaction of fly ash based geopolymer , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[61]  Alaa M. Rashad,et al.  Lightweight expanded clay aggregate as a building material – An overview , 2018 .

[62]  Luiz A. Pereira-de-Oliveira,et al.  Mix design of structural lightweight self-compacting concrete incorporating coarse lightweight expanded clay aggregates , 2018 .

[63]  P. Mendis,et al.  Enhancing the strength of pre-made foams for foam concrete applications , 2018 .

[64]  Mohd Warid Hussin,et al.  Self-compacting geopolymer concrete with spend garnet as sand replacement , 2018 .

[65]  R. Černý,et al.  Lime-based plasters with combined expanded clay-silica aggregate: Microstructure, texture and engineering properties , 2017 .

[66]  M. Maslehuddin,et al.  Durability performance of Palm Oil Fuel Ash-based Engineered Alkaline-activated Cementitious Composite (POFA-EACC) mortar in sulfate environment , 2017 .

[67]  Mijia Yang,et al.  Early strength and durability of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete , 2017 .

[68]  T. A. Dar,et al.  Development of Fly Ash based Geopolymer Concrete , 2017 .

[69]  Nicholas H. Florin,et al.  Decarbonising the cement sector: A bottom-up model for optimising carbon capture application in the UK , 2016 .

[70]  Faiz Uddin Ahmed Shaikh,et al.  Mechanical and durability properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete containing recycled coarse aggregates , 2016 .

[71]  S. Gutiérrez-González,et al.  Lightweight masonry mortars made with expanded clay and recycled aggregates , 2016 .

[72]  Paul Ziehl,et al.  Investigation of early compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete , 2016 .

[73]  Zhongyuan Lu,et al.  Investigation of the properties of high-porosity cement foams based on ternary Portland cement–metakaolin–silica fume blends , 2016 .

[74]  William D.A. Rickard,et al.  In-situ thermo-mechanical testing of fly ash geopolymer concretes made with quartz and expanded clay aggregates , 2016 .

[75]  X. Xi,et al.  Lightweight and high-strength glass foams prepared by a novel green spheres hollowing technique , 2016 .

[76]  Murat Kurt,et al.  The effect of pumice powder on the self-compactability of pumice aggregate lightweight concrete , 2016 .

[77]  Mehmet Gesoǧlu,et al.  Fracture behavior and mechanical properties of concrete with artificial lightweight aggregate and steel fiber , 2015 .

[78]  Andrew C. Heath,et al.  Minimising the global warming potential of clay based geopolymers , 2014 .

[79]  M. Jumaat,et al.  A comparison study of the mechanical properties and drying shrinkage of oil palm shell and expanded clay lightweight aggregate concretes , 2014 .

[80]  Ilaria Capasso,et al.  The effect of recycled plastic aggregate on chemico-physical and functional properties of composite mortars , 2014 .

[81]  F. Collins,et al.  Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete , 2013 .

[82]  U. J. Alengaram,et al.  Mix design for fly ash based oil palm shell geopolymer lightweight concrete , 2013 .

[83]  A. Ozguven,et al.  Examination of effective parameters for the production of expanded clay aggregate , 2012 .

[84]  Martyn Jones,et al.  Fly Ash Route to Low Embodied CO2 and Implications for Concrete Construction , 2011 .

[85]  I. Pioro,et al.  Production of expanded-clay aggregate for lightweight concrete from non-selfbloating clays , 2004 .

[86]  J. Deventer,et al.  The effect of ionic contaminants on the early-age properties of alkali-activated fly ash-based cements , 2002 .

[87]  Matthias Fawer,et al.  Life cycle inventories for the production of sodium silicates , 1999 .

[88]  V. S. Gopalaratnam,et al.  Measurement of Properties of Fiber Reinforced Concrete , 1988 .