The Consumer Neuroscience of Packaging

Given the explosion of interest in the fields of multisensory packaging design and consumer neuroscience/neuromarketing in recent years, it is natural to wonder what relevance the latter approaches have as far as the optimization of the former is concerned. In this review, we chart the use of neuroimaging techniques such as electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging by those wishing to understand the neural response of consumers to various examples of multisensory product packaging. The hope is that such insights might one day help businesses to better predict the performance of product packaging, given specific strategic objectives. To date, much of the research has focused simply on determining the network of brain areas that are involved in processing visual images of product packaging. Intriguingly, though, the latest findings now suggest that composite brain measures seen in response to product communication may, under certain conditions at least, be used to predict a product’s sales success in the marketplace. We highlight the key challenges associated with using neuroimaging techniques for packaging research and stress the limitations (such as the challenges associated with assessing the influence of tactile and olfactory attributes of the packaging, as well as collecting repeated measures when consumers interact with the product in its packaging). We end by reviewing the latest insights that have emerged from the use of neuroscience-inspired (consumer neuroscience) techniques (including so-called implicit tests, such as the Implicit Association Test, and eye-tracking), that have managed to overcome some of the limitations associated with neuroimaging.

[1]  Cesare Parise,et al.  Assessing the associations between brand packaging and brand attributes using an indirect performance measure , 2012 .

[2]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  P. Kenning,et al.  Consumer neuroscience the effect of retail brands on the perception of product packaging , 2009 .

[4]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Altering expectancy dampens neural response to aversive taste in primary taste cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Geke D.S. Ludden,et al.  Effects of visual-auditory incongruity on product expression and surprise , 2007 .

[6]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  Health and Pleasure in Consumers' Dietary Food Choices: Individual Differences in the Brain's Value System , 2016, PloS one.

[7]  C. Graaf,et al.  Why a ‘light’ product package should not be light blue: Effects of package colour on perceived healthiness and attractiveness of sugar- and fat-reduced products , 2017 .

[8]  C. Fisher,et al.  Defining Neuromarketing: Practices and Professional Challenges , 2010, Harvard review of psychiatry.

[9]  M. Catterall,et al.  Focus Groups in Marketing Research , 2006 .

[10]  Sidney Weinstein,et al.  Brain wave analysis in advertising research. Validation from basic research & independent replications , 1984 .

[11]  Nicolas S. Linder,et al.  Organic labeling influences food valuation and choice , 2010, NeuroImage.

[12]  S. Debener,et al.  Concealed, Unobtrusive Ear-Centered EEG Acquisition: cEEGrids for Transparent EEG , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[13]  Nick Lee,et al.  Neuromarketing and consumer neuroscience: contributions to neurology , 2013, BMC Neurology.

[14]  A. Bechara Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Geke D.S. Ludden,et al.  Visual–Tactual Incongruities in Products as Sources of Surprise , 2009 .

[16]  Thomas Johannes Lucas van Rompay,et al.  Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations , 2011 .

[17]  Norihiro Sadato,et al.  Dissociable neural responses in the hippocampus to the retrieval of facial identity and emotion: An event‐related fMRI study , 2003, Hippocampus.

[18]  M. Delgado,et al.  Reward‐Related Responses in the Human Striatum , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  M. Bradley,et al.  Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[20]  H. E. Krugman,et al.  Brain wave measures of media involvement. , 1971 .

[21]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system , 2009, NeuroImage.

[22]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Neuromarketing: Ethical Implications of its Use and Potential Misuse , 2016, Journal of Business Ethics.

[23]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  The Smartphone Brain Scanner: A Portable Real-Time Neuroimaging System , 2013, PloS one.

[24]  Nick Lee,et al.  Welcome to the jungle! The neuromarketing literature through the eyes of a newcomer , 2018 .

[25]  Using implicit methods to develop an objective measure of media brand engagement , 2014 .

[26]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  Eating with our eyes: From visual hunger to digital satiation , 2016, Brain and Cognition.

[27]  Jeffrey F. Durgee,et al.  Perceiving What Package Designs Express: A Multisensory Exploratory Study Using Creative Writing Measurement Techniques , 1996 .

[28]  Hilke Plassmann,et al.  Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook , 2012 .

[29]  C. Spence The Neuroscience of Flavor , 2016 .

[30]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  The first taste is always with the eyes: A meta-analysis on the neural correlates of processing visual food cues , 2011, NeuroImage.

[31]  Samuel M. McClure,et al.  Neural Correlates of Behavioral Preference for Culturally Familiar Drinks , 2004, Neuron.

[32]  S. Kühn,et al.  Does Taste Matter? How Anticipation of Cola Brands Influences Gustatory Processing in the Brain , 2013, PloS one.

[33]  Charles Spence,et al.  Using combined eye tracking and word association in order to assess novel packaging solutions: A case study involving jam jars , 2013 .

[34]  B. Turetsky,et al.  Emotional graphic cigarette warning labels reduce the electrophysiological brain response to smoking cues , 2015, Addiction biology.

[35]  Jacob L. Orquin,et al.  Attention and choice: a review on eye movements in decision making. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[36]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook Of Psychophysiology , 2019 .

[37]  Werner Kroeber-Riel,et al.  Activation Research: Psychobiological Approaches in Consumer Research , 1979 .

[38]  J. Henrich,et al.  The weirdest people in the world? , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[39]  B. Miloyan,et al.  The Pepsi Paradox: A review , 2017 .

[40]  Ellen Poliakoff,et al.  Expected taste intensity affects response to sweet drinks in primary taste cortex , 2011, Neuroreport.

[41]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Consumer neuroscience: Assessing the brain response to marketing stimuli using electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye tracking , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[42]  P. Aspinall,et al.  The urban brain: analysing outdoor physical activity with mobile EEG , 2013, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[43]  Martin Lindström,et al.  Buy-ology: How Everything We Believe About Why We Buy is Wrong , 2009 .

[44]  P. Kenning,et al.  What they see is what they get? An fMRI‐study on neural correlates of attractive packaging , 2008 .

[45]  D. Ariely,et al.  Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[46]  Laura E. Martin Effects of plain packaging on decision-making and reward for nicotine cigarettes , 2014 .

[47]  Peter Gates,et al.  The influence of product packaging on young people's palatability rating for RTDS and other alcoholic beverages. , 2006, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[48]  A. R. Gilliland,et al.  The psychogalvanometric method for measuring the effectiveness of advertising. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  J. Guixeres,et al.  Consumer Neuroscience-Based Metrics Predict Recall, Liking and Viewing Rates in Online Advertising , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[50]  R. Pieters,et al.  A Review of Eye-Tracking Research in Marketing , 2008 .

[51]  F. Strack,et al.  Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[52]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory design: Reaching out to touch the consumer , 2011 .

[53]  Charles Spence,et al.  Multisensory Presence in Virtual Reality: Possibilities & Limitations. , 2011 .

[54]  C. Spence Neuroscience-Inspired Design: From Academic Neuromarketing to Commercially Relevant Research , 2019 .

[55]  R. Riedl,et al.  Trust me if you can – neurophysiological insights on the influence of consumer impulsiveness on trustworthiness evaluations in online settings , 2018 .

[56]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  Pleasure and the Control of Food Intake: An Embodied Cognition Approach to Consumer Self‐Regulation , 2016 .

[58]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory brand search: How the meaning of sounds guides consumers' visual attention. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[59]  Michel Wedel,et al.  A review of eye-tracking applications in marketing , 2007 .

[60]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Appearance Matters: Neural Correlates of Food Choice and Packaging Aesthetics , 2012, PloS one.

[61]  D. Fugate Neuromarketing: a layman's look at neuroscience and its potential application to marketing practice , 2007 .

[62]  J. Zaichkowsky,et al.  Aesthetic package design: A behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation , 2010 .

[63]  Dan Jones Psychology. A WEIRD view of human nature skews psychologists' studies. , 2010, Science.

[64]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[65]  Ale Smidts,et al.  Neural Profiling of Brands: Mapping Brand Image in Consumers’ Brains with Visual Templates , 2018 .

[66]  A. Pradeep The Buying Brain: Secrets for Selling to the Subconscious Mind , 2010 .

[67]  Peter Kenning,et al.  The application of mobile fNIRS to “shopper neuroscience” – first insights from a merchandising communication study , 2018 .

[68]  Olivier Oullier,et al.  Why People Drink Shampoo? Food Imitating Products Are Fooling Brains and Endangering Consumers for Marketing Purposes , 2014, PloS one.

[69]  R. Poldrack Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[70]  Emily B. Falk,et al.  Predicting Persuasion-Induced Behavior Change from the Brain , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[71]  Olivier Oullier,et al.  Clear up this fuzzy thinking on brain scans , 2012, Nature.

[72]  J. P. Hickey,et al.  THE POWER OF PACKAGING , 1999 .

[73]  Melika Husic-Mehmedovic,et al.  Seeing is not necessarily liking: Advancing research on package design with eye-tracking ☆ , 2017 .

[74]  S. Levinson,et al.  WEIRD languages have misled us, too , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[75]  Charles Spence,et al.  Crossmodal correspondences in product packaging. Assessing color–flavor correspondences for potato chips (crisps) , 2011, Appetite.

[76]  Carlos Velasco,et al.  Evaluating the impact of early- and late-acquired phonemes on the luxury appeal of brand names , 2017 .

[77]  Simone Kühn,et al.  Multiple “buy buttons” in the brain: Forecasting chocolate sales at point-of-sale based on functional brain activation using fMRI , 2016, NeuroImage.

[78]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Neural Predictors of Purchases , 2007, Neuron.

[79]  Michael J Brammer,et al.  Predicting Consumer Behavior: Using Novel Mind-Reading Approaches , 2012, IEEE Pulse.

[80]  S. Debener,et al.  Unobtrusive ambulatory EEG using a smartphone and flexible printed electrodes around the ear , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[81]  J. Clement Visual influence on in-store buying decisions: an eye-track experiment on the visual influence of packaging design , 2007 .

[82]  Carlos Velasco,et al.  The hand grasps the center, while the eyes saccade to the top of novel objects , 2015, Front. Psychol..