The Consumer Neuroscience of Packaging
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Cesare Parise,et al. Assessing the associations between brand packaging and brand attributes using an indirect performance measure , 2012 .
[2] S. Shimojo,et al. Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.
[3] P. Kenning,et al. Consumer neuroscience the effect of retail brands on the perception of product packaging , 2009 .
[4] Edward E. Smith,et al. Altering expectancy dampens neural response to aversive taste in primary taste cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.
[5] Geke D.S. Ludden,et al. Effects of visual-auditory incongruity on product expression and surprise , 2007 .
[6] Adrian David Cheok,et al. Health and Pleasure in Consumers' Dietary Food Choices: Individual Differences in the Brain's Value System , 2016, PloS one.
[7] C. Graaf,et al. Why a ‘light’ product package should not be light blue: Effects of package colour on perceived healthiness and attractiveness of sugar- and fat-reduced products , 2017 .
[8] C. Fisher,et al. Defining Neuromarketing: Practices and Professional Challenges , 2010, Harvard review of psychiatry.
[9] M. Catterall,et al. Focus Groups in Marketing Research , 2006 .
[10] Sidney Weinstein,et al. Brain wave analysis in advertising research. Validation from basic research & independent replications , 1984 .
[11] Nicolas S. Linder,et al. Organic labeling influences food valuation and choice , 2010, NeuroImage.
[12] S. Debener,et al. Concealed, Unobtrusive Ear-Centered EEG Acquisition: cEEGrids for Transparent EEG , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[13] Nick Lee,et al. Neuromarketing and consumer neuroscience: contributions to neurology , 2013, BMC Neurology.
[14] A. Bechara. Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.
[15] Geke D.S. Ludden,et al. Visual–Tactual Incongruities in Products as Sources of Surprise , 2009 .
[16] Thomas Johannes Lucas van Rompay,et al. Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations , 2011 .
[17] Norihiro Sadato,et al. Dissociable neural responses in the hippocampus to the retrieval of facial identity and emotion: An event‐related fMRI study , 2003, Hippocampus.
[18] M. Delgado,et al. Reward‐Related Responses in the Human Striatum , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[19] M. Bradley,et al. Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report , 2000, Biological Psychology.
[20] H. E. Krugman,et al. Brain wave measures of media involvement. , 1971 .
[21] Colin Camerer,et al. Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system , 2009, NeuroImage.
[22] Scott A. Huettel,et al. Neuromarketing: Ethical Implications of its Use and Potential Misuse , 2016, Journal of Business Ethics.
[23] Lars Kai Hansen,et al. The Smartphone Brain Scanner: A Portable Real-Time Neuroimaging System , 2013, PloS one.
[24] Nick Lee,et al. Welcome to the jungle! The neuromarketing literature through the eyes of a newcomer , 2018 .
[25] Using implicit methods to develop an objective measure of media brand engagement , 2014 .
[26] Adrian David Cheok,et al. Eating with our eyes: From visual hunger to digital satiation , 2016, Brain and Cognition.
[27] Jeffrey F. Durgee,et al. Perceiving What Package Designs Express: A Multisensory Exploratory Study Using Creative Writing Measurement Techniques , 1996 .
[28] Hilke Plassmann,et al. Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook , 2012 .
[29] C. Spence. The Neuroscience of Flavor , 2016 .
[30] Max A. Viergever,et al. The first taste is always with the eyes: A meta-analysis on the neural correlates of processing visual food cues , 2011, NeuroImage.
[31] Samuel M. McClure,et al. Neural Correlates of Behavioral Preference for Culturally Familiar Drinks , 2004, Neuron.
[32] S. Kühn,et al. Does Taste Matter? How Anticipation of Cola Brands Influences Gustatory Processing in the Brain , 2013, PloS one.
[33] Charles Spence,et al. Using combined eye tracking and word association in order to assess novel packaging solutions: A case study involving jam jars , 2013 .
[34] B. Turetsky,et al. Emotional graphic cigarette warning labels reduce the electrophysiological brain response to smoking cues , 2015, Addiction biology.
[35] Jacob L. Orquin,et al. Attention and choice: a review on eye movements in decision making. , 2013, Acta psychologica.
[36] J. Cacioppo,et al. Handbook Of Psychophysiology , 2019 .
[37] Werner Kroeber-Riel,et al. Activation Research: Psychobiological Approaches in Consumer Research , 1979 .
[38] J. Henrich,et al. The weirdest people in the world? , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[39] B. Miloyan,et al. The Pepsi Paradox: A review , 2017 .
[40] Ellen Poliakoff,et al. Expected taste intensity affects response to sweet drinks in primary taste cortex , 2011, Neuroreport.
[41] Jordan J. Louviere,et al. Consumer neuroscience: Assessing the brain response to marketing stimuli using electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye tracking , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..
[42] P. Aspinall,et al. The urban brain: analysing outdoor physical activity with mobile EEG , 2013, British Journal of Sports Medicine.
[43] Martin Lindström,et al. Buy-ology: How Everything We Believe About Why We Buy is Wrong , 2009 .
[44] P. Kenning,et al. What they see is what they get? An fMRI‐study on neural correlates of attractive packaging , 2008 .
[45] D. Ariely,et al. Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[46] Laura E. Martin. Effects of plain packaging on decision-making and reward for nicotine cigarettes , 2014 .
[47] Peter Gates,et al. The influence of product packaging on young people's palatability rating for RTDS and other alcoholic beverages. , 2006, Alcohol and alcoholism.
[48] A. R. Gilliland,et al. The psychogalvanometric method for measuring the effectiveness of advertising. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.
[49] J. Guixeres,et al. Consumer Neuroscience-Based Metrics Predict Recall, Liking and Viewing Rates in Online Advertising , 2017, Front. Psychol..
[50] R. Pieters,et al. A Review of Eye-Tracking Research in Marketing , 2008 .
[51] F. Strack,et al. Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
[52] C. Spence,et al. Multisensory design: Reaching out to touch the consumer , 2011 .
[53] Charles Spence,et al. Multisensory Presence in Virtual Reality: Possibilities & Limitations. , 2011 .
[54] C. Spence. Neuroscience-Inspired Design: From Academic Neuromarketing to Commercially Relevant Research , 2019 .
[55] R. Riedl,et al. Trust me if you can – neurophysiological insights on the influence of consumer impulsiveness on trustworthiness evaluations in online settings , 2018 .
[56] J. O'Doherty,et al. Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[57] Adrian David Cheok,et al. Pleasure and the Control of Food Intake: An Embodied Cognition Approach to Consumer Self‐Regulation , 2016 .
[58] C. Spence,et al. Multisensory brand search: How the meaning of sounds guides consumers' visual attention. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[59] Michel Wedel,et al. A review of eye-tracking applications in marketing , 2007 .
[60] Max A. Viergever,et al. Appearance Matters: Neural Correlates of Food Choice and Packaging Aesthetics , 2012, PloS one.
[61] D. Fugate. Neuromarketing: a layman's look at neuroscience and its potential application to marketing practice , 2007 .
[62] J. Zaichkowsky,et al. Aesthetic package design: A behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation , 2010 .
[63] Dan Jones. Psychology. A WEIRD view of human nature skews psychologists' studies. , 2010, Science.
[64] Brian A. Nosek,et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[65] Ale Smidts,et al. Neural Profiling of Brands: Mapping Brand Image in Consumers’ Brains with Visual Templates , 2018 .
[66] A. Pradeep. The Buying Brain: Secrets for Selling to the Subconscious Mind , 2010 .
[67] Peter Kenning,et al. The application of mobile fNIRS to “shopper neuroscience” – first insights from a merchandising communication study , 2018 .
[68] Olivier Oullier,et al. Why People Drink Shampoo? Food Imitating Products Are Fooling Brains and Endangering Consumers for Marketing Purposes , 2014, PloS one.
[69] R. Poldrack. Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[70] Emily B. Falk,et al. Predicting Persuasion-Induced Behavior Change from the Brain , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[71] Olivier Oullier,et al. Clear up this fuzzy thinking on brain scans , 2012, Nature.
[72] J. P. Hickey,et al. THE POWER OF PACKAGING , 1999 .
[73] Melika Husic-Mehmedovic,et al. Seeing is not necessarily liking: Advancing research on package design with eye-tracking ☆ , 2017 .
[74] S. Levinson,et al. WEIRD languages have misled us, too , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[75] Charles Spence,et al. Crossmodal correspondences in product packaging. Assessing color–flavor correspondences for potato chips (crisps) , 2011, Appetite.
[76] Carlos Velasco,et al. Evaluating the impact of early- and late-acquired phonemes on the luxury appeal of brand names , 2017 .
[77] Simone Kühn,et al. Multiple “buy buttons” in the brain: Forecasting chocolate sales at point-of-sale based on functional brain activation using fMRI , 2016, NeuroImage.
[78] G. Loewenstein,et al. Neural Predictors of Purchases , 2007, Neuron.
[79] Michael J Brammer,et al. Predicting Consumer Behavior: Using Novel Mind-Reading Approaches , 2012, IEEE Pulse.
[80] S. Debener,et al. Unobtrusive ambulatory EEG using a smartphone and flexible printed electrodes around the ear , 2015, Scientific Reports.
[81] J. Clement. Visual influence on in-store buying decisions: an eye-track experiment on the visual influence of packaging design , 2007 .
[82] Carlos Velasco,et al. The hand grasps the center, while the eyes saccade to the top of novel objects , 2015, Front. Psychol..