Building sickness syndrome in healthy and unhealthy buildings: an epidemiological and environmental assessment with cluster analysis

OBJECTIVES Building sickness syndrome remains poorly understood. Aetiological factors range from temperature, humidity, and air movement to internal pollutants, dust, lighting, and noise factors. The reported study was designed to investigate whether relations between symptoms of sick building syndrome and measured environmental factors existed within state of the art air conditioned buildings with satisfactory maintenance programmes expected to provide a healthy indoor environment. METHODS Five buildings were studied, three of which were state of the art air conditioned buildings. One was a naturally ventilated control building and one a previously studied and known sick building. A questionnaire was administered to the study population to measure the presence of building related symptoms. This was followed by a detailed environmental survey in identified high and low symptom areas within each building. These areas were compared for their environmental performance. RESULTS Two of the air conditioned buildings performed well with a low prevalence of building related symptoms. Both of these buildings out performed the naturally ventilated building for the low number of symptoms and in many of the environmental measures. One building (C), expected to perform well from a design viewpoint had a high prevalence of symptoms and behaved in a similar manner to the known sick building. Environmental indices associated with symptoms varied from building to building. Consistent associations between environmental variables were found for particulates (itchy eyes, dry throat, headache, and lethargy) across all buildings. There were persisting relations between particulates and symptoms (headache, lethargy, and dry skin) even in the building with the lowest level of symptoms and of measured airborne particulates (building B). There were also consistent findings for noise variables with low frequency noise being directly associated with symptoms (stuffy nose, itchy eyes, and dry skin) and higher frequency noise being relatively protective across all buildings. CONCLUSIONS This is the first epidemiological study of expected state of the art, air conditioned buildings. These buildings can produce an internal environment better than that of naturally ventilated buildings for both reported symptoms and environmental variables. The factors associated with symptoms varied widely across the different buildings studied although consistent associations for symptoms were found with increased exposure to particulates and low frequency noise.

[1]  J. Woods An engineering approach to controlling indoor air quality. , 1991, Environmental health perspectives.

[2]  H. G. Leventhall,et al.  EFFECTS ON PERFORMANCE AND WORK QUALITY DUE TO LOW FREQUENCY VENTILATION NOISE , 1997 .

[3]  R Akselsson,et al.  Influence of indoor air quality and personal factors on the sick building syndrome (SBS) in Swedish geriatric hospitals. , 1995, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[4]  R. Tamblyn,et al.  Exposure to varying levels of contaminants and symptoms among workers in two office buildings. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[5]  G. Abbritti,et al.  High prevalence of sick building syndrome in a new air-conditioned building in Italy. , 1992, Archives of environmental health.

[6]  P. Fanger,et al.  The impact of human perception of simultaneous exposure to thermal load, low-frequency ventilation noise and indoor air pollution , 1999 .

[7]  E. Faragher,et al.  An investigation of the relationship between microbial and particulate indoor air pollution and the sick building syndrome. , 1992, Respiratory medicine.

[8]  M J Hodgson,et al.  Symptoms and microenvironmental measures in nonproblem buildings. , 1991, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[9]  D J Burton Inadequate air distribution and poor mixing cause IAQ problems. Moving partitions, walls, and furniture may change the air flow, often for the worse. , 1996, Occupational health & safety.

[10]  J. Jaakkola,et al.  Ventilation rate in office buildings and sick building syndrome. , 1995, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[11]  O. Valbjørn,et al.  The “sick” building syndrome in the office environment: The Danish town hall study , 1987 .

[12]  J. Verhoef,et al.  Airborne gram-negative bacteria and endotoxin in sick building syndrome. A study in Dutch governmental office buildings. , 1994, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  A Hedge,et al.  Toxicological considerations in evaluating indoor air quality and human health: impact of new carpet emissions. , 1996, Critical reviews in toxicology.