Interactive technology and human-animal encounters at the zoo

In this paper we investigate social dimensions of technology use in human-animal interactions, through a study of interactive systems at the zoo.Zoos are a familiar place for encounters between humans and non-domesticated animals. Accordingly, we examine zoos as a significant site to extend research into animal-computer interaction (ACI). We present a case study that examines the deployment and use of new digital technologies that intervene in, and influence, human-animal relationships.The paper reports on interactive systems in use at Melbourne Zoo. The study investigates the use and impact of technology in the course of human-animal encounters, including how human use of technology in this setting shapes encounters in subtle ways. We examine five interactive systems used by visitors (Digital Signs and the Zoopermarket), by zoo personnel with visitors (Educator Screens and Volunteer iPads), and by zoo personnel with animals (Apps for Apes).Our work draws broad insights for the design and understanding of animal-human-computer interaction at the zoo, as a catalyst for further research into this site of considerable significance to animal-computer interaction. We identified four key themes in the ways that interactive systems are intervening in human-animal encounters at the zoo. Firstly, interactive technology at the zoo risks distracting from visitors' encounters with animals. Secondly, the appearance and use of technology moreover runs counter to expectations of naturalistic zoo landscapes. Thirdly, interactive systems however offer opportunities to enhance important aspects of visitors' experience of animal encounters, and to widen the temporal and spatial dimensions of the encounter. Finally, we interpret these insights by examining how technology is used in the context of interactions between numerous human and animal actors, and in a setting impacted by complex social and organisational forces. From this, we identify the need for ACI to consider technology use by diverse people and animals; that multiple interactions may occur at once; the diverse social activities that may surround human-animal interactions; the distributed form of interactions between multiple participants; and the performative nature of some human-animal encounters. Zoos offer a site to study technology as part of complex human-animal interactions.Technology shapes human-animal encounters in subtle ways.Design needs to accommodate diverse human and animal participants.Human-animal interactions may be distributed or entail multiple interactions.Interactions occur as part of social activities and can involve performance.

[1]  Clara Mancini,et al.  Animal-computer interaction (ACI): changing perspective on HCI, participation and sustainability , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[2]  Haibo Li,et al.  Augmented reality to enhance visitors experience in a digital zoo , 2010, MUM.

[3]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  FELINE FUN PARK: A DISTRIBUTED TANGIBLE INTERFACE FOR PETS AND OWNERS , 2007 .

[4]  Hanna Wirman,et al.  Orangutan play on and beyond a touch screen , 2013 .

[5]  B. J. Oates,et al.  Researching Information Systems and Computing , 2005 .

[6]  Hideaki Ogawa,et al.  Making new learning environment in zoo by adopting mobile devices , 2008, Mobile HCI.

[7]  Clara Mancini,et al.  Canine-centered interface design: supporting the work of diabetes alert dogs , 2014, CHI.

[8]  L. Brent,et al.  Primate puzzleboard: A simple environmental enrichment device for captive chimpanzees , 1991 .

[9]  Clara Mancini,et al.  Empowering assistance dogs: an alarm interface for canine use , 2014 .

[10]  J. Fraser,et al.  Enjoyment in zoos , 2009 .

[11]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[12]  S. Clayton,et al.  Zoo experiences: conversations, connections, and concern for animals. , 2009, Zoo biology.

[13]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Supporting interspecies social awareness: using peripheral displays for distributed pack awareness , 2005, UIST.

[14]  Rui Trindade,et al.  Purrfect Crime: Exploring Animal Computer Interaction through a Digital Game for Humans and Cats , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[15]  Leilah Lyons,et al.  Teachable mo[bil]ment: capitalizing on teachable moments with mobile technology in zoos , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  Oskar Juhlin,et al.  Understanding people and animals: the use of a positioning system in ordinary human-canine interaction , 2011, CHI.

[17]  Julian Smith Apps for apes: Orang-utans want iPads for Christmas , 2011 .

[18]  A. Canhoto,et al.  Case Study Research Design , 2014 .

[19]  J. Heimlich,et al.  Exploring use of new media in environmental education contexts: introducing visitors’ technology use in zoos model , 2011 .

[20]  Stefano Gualeni,et al.  Digitally complemented zoomorphism: a theoretical foundation for human-animal interaction design , 2013, DPPI.

[21]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Nicholas J. Kelling,et al.  Zooar Zoo Based Augmented Reality Signage , 2014 .

[23]  J. Falk An Identity‐Centered Approach to Understanding Museum Learning , 2006 .

[24]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  A mobile pet wearable computer and mixed reality system for human–poultry interaction through the internet , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[25]  G. Hosey Zoo Animals and Their Human Audiences: What is the Visitor Effect? , 2000, Animal Welfare.

[26]  N. Waran,et al.  The modern zoo: How do people perceive zoo animals? , 1996 .

[27]  Richard K. Coll,et al.  Zoos as a Source of Free Choice Learning , 2003 .

[28]  L. Andersen Zoo Interpretation and Exhibit Design: Two Sides of the Same Coin , 1991 .

[29]  Jennifer Matiasek,et al.  An exploratory study of zoo visitors' exhibit experiences and reactions. , 2013, Zoo biology.

[30]  Fusako Kusunoki,et al.  LEGS system in a zoo: use of mobile phones to enhance observation of animals , 2009, IDC.

[31]  Frank Noz,et al.  Cat cat revolution: an interspecies gaming experience , 2011, CHI.

[32]  Bonnie M. Perdue,et al.  Technology at the zoo: the influence of a touchscreen computer on orangutans and zoo visitors. , 2012, Zoo biology.

[33]  Bonnie M. Perdue,et al.  The use of technology to enhance zoological parks. , 2011, Zoo biology.

[34]  L. Dierking,et al.  Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: lessons from research in zoos and aquariums , 2007 .

[35]  S. Lilienfeld,et al.  Do Zoos and Aquariums Promote Attitude Change in Visitors? A Critical Evaluation of the American Zoo and Aquarium Study , 2010 .

[36]  Wally Smith,et al.  Re-connecting visual content to place in a mobile guide for the Shrine of Remembrance , 2010, EVA.

[37]  Benjamin Ishak Resner,et al.  Rover@Home : computer mediated remote interaction between humans and dogs , 2001 .

[38]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  Metazoa Ludens: Mixed Reality Interaction and Play Between Humans and Animals , 2010 .

[39]  J. Mellen,et al.  Philosophy of environmental enrichment: Past, present, and future , 2001 .

[40]  Laurel Evelyn Dyson,et al.  Animal personas: acknowledging non-human stakeholders in designing for sustainable food systems , 2014, OZCHI.

[41]  R. Ballantyne,et al.  Visitors’ memories of wildlife tourism: Implications for the design of powerful interpretive experiences , 2011 .

[42]  Oskar Juhlin,et al.  Smelling, pulling, and looking: unpacking similarities and differences in dog and human city life , 2015, Advances in Computer Entertainment.

[43]  S. Ham,et al.  The Impacts of Profound Wildlife Experiences , 2011 .

[44]  Judy Perry,et al.  AR gone wild: two approaches to using augmented reality learning games in Zoos , 2008, ICLS.

[45]  R. J. Goldsworthy,et al.  The effects of zoo environments on public attitudes toward endangered wildlife , 1979 .

[46]  P. Reynolds,et al.  Towards a conceptual framework for wildlife tourism , 2001 .

[47]  Robert E. McGrath,et al.  Species-appropriate computer mediated interaction , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[48]  Mandy L. Kirchgessner,et al.  The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Animal Factors on Visitor Stay Times at Big Cat Exhibits , 2015 .

[49]  Eduardo J. Fernandez,et al.  Animal–visitor interactions in the modern zoo: Conflicts and interventions , 2009 .

[50]  Lawrence R. James,et al.  People's Perceptions of Animals , 1988 .

[51]  Jon C. Coe,et al.  Design and perception: Making the zoo experience real , 1985 .

[52]  H Wirman,et al.  The playing other and what we cannot help learning from the study of animal play , 2013 .

[53]  G. Moscardo,et al.  The role of interpretation in wildlife tourism , 2004 .

[54]  Clara Mancini,et al.  Re-Centering Multispecies Practices: A Canine Interface for Cancer Detection Dogs , 2015, CHI.

[55]  Hanna Wirman,et al.  Multispecies methods, technologies for play , 2016, Digit. Creativity.

[56]  Oskar Juhlin,et al.  Communication technology for human-dog interaction: exploration of dog owners' experiences and expectations , 2011, CHI.

[57]  G. Hosey,et al.  Interaction sequences between chimpanzees and human visitors at the Zoo , 1995 .

[58]  Thad Starner,et al.  Going to the dogs: towards an interactive touchscreen interface for working dogs , 2014, UIST.

[59]  G. Hosey A preliminary model of human–animal relationships in the zoo , 2008 .

[60]  Bonnie C. Hallman,et al.  Family leisure, family photography and zoos: exploring the emotional geographies of families , 2007 .

[61]  J. Heimlich,et al.  Assessing the Impact of a Visit to a Zoo or Aquarium: Why Zoos and Aquariums Matter , 2007 .

[62]  Martin Ludvigsen,et al.  Designing technology for active spectator experiences at sporting events , 2010, OZCHI '10.

[63]  Michitaka Hirose,et al.  Tele echo tube: beyond cultural and imaginable boundaries , 2013, ACM Multimedia.

[64]  Stefano Gualeni,et al.  Felino : The Philosophical Practice of Making an Interspecies Videogame , 2014 .

[65]  Andrew Stuart,et al.  Exploring interspecies sensemaking: dog tracking semiotics and multispecies ethnography , 2012, UbiComp.

[66]  Elizabeth S. Herrelko,et al.  An assessment of the development of a cognitive research programme and introductions in zoo-housed chimpanzees , 2011 .

[67]  Clara Mancini,et al.  Animal-computer interaction: a manifesto , 2011, INTR.

[68]  Neil Smith,et al.  Designing smart toys for the cognitive enrichment of elephants , 2014 .

[69]  Marcus Carter,et al.  Naturalism and ACI: augmenting zoo enclosures with digital technology , 2015, Advances in Computer Entertainment.

[70]  Jillian Dorrian,et al.  Evaluating the conservation impact of an innovative zoo-based educational campaign: ‘Don't Palm Us Off’ for orang-utan conservation , 2014, Zoo biology.

[71]  Bonnie M. Perdue,et al.  Using Technology to Educate Zoo Visitors About Conservation , 2012 .

[72]  Marcus Carter,et al.  Cross-disciplinary perspectives on animal welfare science and animal-computer interaction , 2015, Advances in Computer Entertainment.

[73]  B. Weiler,et al.  Does more interpretation lead to greater outcomes? An assessment of the impacts of multiple layers of interpretation in a zoo context , 2009 .

[74]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Collecting and Sharing Location-based Content on Mobile Phones in a Zoo Visitor Experience , 2007, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[75]  Gregory A Petsko,et al.  Going to the dogs , 2008, Genome Biology.

[76]  J. Hoy,et al.  Thirty years later: enrichment practices for captive mammals. , 2009, Zoo biology.

[77]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Improving guide dog team play with accessible dog toys , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[78]  M. Bloomsmith,et al.  Enhancing the Zoo Visitor’s Experience by Public Animal Training and Oral Interpretation at an Otter Exhibit , 2003 .

[79]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[80]  K. Fanson,et al.  Effects of visual contact with zoo visitors on black-capped capuchin welfare , 2015 .