The performance of the Norwegian carbon dioxide, capture and storage innovation system

In order to take up Norway's twin challenge of reducing CO2 emissions, while meeting its growing energy demand with domestic resources, the deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) plays an important role in Norwegian energy policies. This study uses the Functions of Innovation Systems approach to identify key policy issues that need to be addressed in order to prolong Norway's international leadership position in the development of CCS. The analysis shows that Norway has been successful in building an innovation system around CCS technology. The key determinants for this achievement are pinpointed in this article. However, the evolution of the innovation system seems to have entered a critical phase that is decisive for a further thriving development of CCS in Norway. The results provide a clear understanding of the current impediments in the CCS innovation system and stress the need to direct policy initiatives at the identified weak system functions--i.e. entrepreneurial activity and market formation--to improve the performance of the system. We discuss how policymakers can use these insights to develop a coherent set of policy instruments that would foster the deployment of CCS concepts related to power production and enhanced oil recovery in Norway.

[1]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Explaining the rapid diffusion of Dutch cogeneration by innovation system functioning , 2007 .

[2]  Stian Nygaard,et al.  System failure, innovation policy and patents : Fuel cells and related hydrogen technology in Norway 1990-2002 , 2006 .

[3]  R. Gross,et al.  UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures , 2005 .

[4]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Analysing emerging innovation systems: a functions approach to foresight , 2007 .

[5]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Transforming the Energy Sector : The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology , 2004 .

[6]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion : A functional analysis , 2007 .

[7]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Functions in innovation systems: A framework for analysing energy system dynamics and identifying goals for system-building activities by entrepreneurs and policy makers , 2008 .

[8]  T Maldal,et al.  CO2 underground storage for Snøhvit gas field development , 2004 .

[9]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[10]  C. Edquist.  Reflections on the systems of innovation approach , 2004 .

[11]  Olav Kaarstad.  Emission-free fossil energy from Norway , 1992 .

[12]  Todd Flach,et al.  Stakeholder Perceptions of CO2 Capture and Storage in Europe: Results from the EU-funded ACCSEPT Survey , 2007 .

[13]  Ian Burton,et al.  Report on Reports: Our Common Future , 1987 .

[14]  Ragnhild Korbol,et al.  Sleipner vest CO2 disposal - injection of removed CO2 into the Utsira formation , 1995 .

[15]  B. Metz.  IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[16]  T. Torp,et al.  Demonstrating Storage of CO_2 in Geological Reservoirs : the Sleipner and SACS Projects , 2002 .

[17]  B. Solberg,et al.  Impacts of policy means for increased use of forest-based bioenergy in Norway : A spatial partial equilibrium analysis , 2007 .

[18]  Chris Hendriks,et al.  Regulatory challenges to the implementation of carbon capture and geological storage within the European Union under EU and international law , 2007 .

[19]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  The bumpy road of biomass gasification in the Netherlands: Explaining the rise and fall of an emerging innovation system , 2008 .

[20]  David Reiner,et al.  Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT‐9) , 2008 .

[21]  B. Asheim,et al.  Location, agglomeration and innovation: Towards regional innovation systems in Norway? , 1997 .

[22]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research , 2000 .

[23]  Tore A. Torp,et al.  Demonstrating storage of CO2 in geological reservoirs: The Sleipner and SACS projects , 2004 .

[24]  Portney.  NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE ENVIRONMENT , 1984 .

[25]  C. Freeman.  Technology, policy, and economic performance , 1987 .

[26]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Renewable energy technologies in the Maldives - determining the potential , 2007 .

[27]  R. Kemp,et al.  Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development , 2007 .

[28]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: empirical evidence for earlier claims , 2009 .

[29]  Charles Edquist,et al.  The Systems of Innovation Approach and Innovation Policy: An account of the state of the art , 2001 .

[30]  Frode Kjærland,et al.  A real option analysis of investments in hydropower--The case of Norway , 2007 .

[31]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  Innovation systems and ‘inertia’ in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systemic lock-in , 2002 .

[32]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: The case of biofuels in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[33]  Olav Kårstad,et al.  Saline aquifer storage of carbon dioxide in the Sleipner project , 1998 .

[34]  F. Malerba.  Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[35]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The emergence and troubled growth of a 'biopower' innovation system in Sweden , 2008 .

[36]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis , 2008 .

[37]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[38]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[39]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Transforming the Energy System — the Evolution of the German Technological System for Solar Cells , 2004 .

[40]  R. Nelson.  National Innovation Systems: A Retrospective on a Study , 1992 .

[41]  Andreas Tjernshaugen,et al.  Shaming and Framing: Norwegian Nongovernmental Organizations in the Climate Change Negotiations , 2004 .

[42]  Andreas Tjernshaugen,et al.  Political commitment to CO2 capture and storage: evidence from government RD&D budgets , 2007 .

[43]  Kristin Rypdal,et al.  Carbon capture and storage projects under the climate policy regime: The case of Halten CO2 , 2007 .

[44]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[45]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[46]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[47]  O. Falk-Pedersen,et al.  Separation of carbon dioxide from offshore gas turbine exhaust , 1995 .

[48]  Sam Holloway,et al.  The Joule II project the underground disposal of carbon dioxide , 1995 .

[49]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework , 2008 .