An Eulerian CFD model and X-ray radiography for coupled nozzle flow and spray in internal combustion engines

Abstract This paper implements a coupled approach to integrate the internal nozzle flow and the ensuing fuel spray using a Volume-of-Fluid (VOF) method in the finite-volume framework. A VOF method is used to model the internal nozzle two-phase flow with a cavitation description closed by the homogeneous relaxation model of Bilicki and Kestin (1990). An Eulerian single velocity field approach by Vallet et al. (2001) is implemented for near-nozzle spray modeling. This Eulerian approach considers the liquid and gas phases as a complex mixture with a highly variable density to describe near nozzle dense sprays. The liquid mass fraction is transported with a model for the turbulent liquid diffusion flux into the gas. Fully-coupled nozzle flow and spray simulations are performed in three dimensions and validated against the X-ray radiography measurements of Kastengren et al. (2014) for a diesel fuel surrogate. A standard k – ∊ Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes based turbulence model is used in this study and the influence of model constants is evaluated. First, the grid convergence study is performed. The effect of grid size is also evaluated by comparing the fuel distribution against experimental data. Finally, the fuel distribution predicted by the coupled Eulerian approach is compared against that by Lagrangian–Eulerian spray model along with experimental data. The coupled Eulerian approach provides a unique way of coupling the nozzle flow and sprays so that the effects of in-nozzle flow can be directly realized on the fuel spray. Both experiment and numerical simulations show non-cavitation occurring for this injector with convergent nozzle geometry. The study shows that the Eulerian approach has advantages over near-field dense spray distributions.

[1]  Bénédicte Cuenot,et al.  A model for the injection boundary conditions in the context of 3D simulation of Diesel Spray: Methodology and validation , 2010 .

[2]  Hrvoje Jasak,et al.  Multi-dimensional simulation of thermal non-equilibrium channel flow , 2010 .

[3]  V. Sick,et al.  Attenuation effects on imaging diagnostics of hollow-cone sprays. , 2001, Applied optics.

[4]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Scaling Liquid-Phase Fuel Penetration in Diesel Sprays Based on Mixing-Limited Vaporization , 1999 .

[5]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Soot in diesel fuel jets: effects of ambient temperature, ambient density, and injection pressure , 2004 .

[6]  David P. Schmidt,et al.  Second-Order Spatial Accuracy in Lagrangian–Eulerian Spray Calculations , 2005 .

[7]  Tommaso Lucchini,et al.  Numerical Investigation of Non-Reacting and Reacting Diesel Sprays in Constant-Volume Vessels , 2009 .

[8]  Christopher F. Powell,et al.  Comparison of Near-Field Structure and Growth of a Diesel Spray Using Light-Based Optical Microscopy and X-Ray Radiography , 2014 .

[9]  P. Senecal,et al.  Multi-Dimensional Modeling of Direct-Injection Diesel Spray Liquid Length and Flame Lift-off Length using CFD and Parallel Detailed Chemistry , 2003 .

[10]  Wayne Eckerle,et al.  Research Needs and Impacts in Predictive Simulation for Internal Combustion Engines (PreSICE) , 2011 .

[11]  A. Burluka,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A EULERIAN MODEL FOR THE “ATOMIZATION” OF A LIQUID JET , 2001 .

[12]  David P. Schmidt,et al.  Adaptive collision meshing and satellite droplet formation in spray simulations , 2006 .

[13]  P. K. Senecal,et al.  Grid-Convergent Spray Models for Internal Combustion Engine CFD Simulations , 2012 .

[14]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  Development and testing of diesel engine CFD models , 1995 .

[15]  F. X. Demoulin,et al.  Numerical simulation of primary break-up and atomization: DNS and modelling study , 2009 .

[16]  R. Reitz.  Modeling atomization processes in high-pressure vaporizing sprays , 1987 .

[17]  C. Arcoumanis,et al.  LINKING NOZZLE FLOW WITH SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS IN A DIESEL FUEL INJECTION SYSTEM , 1998 .

[18]  J. Naber,et al.  Effects of Gas Density and Vaporization on Penetration and Dispersion of Diesel Sprays , 1996 .

[19]  Song-Charng Kong,et al.  Modeling diesel spray flame lift-off, sooting tendency and NOx emissions using detailed chemistry , 2005 .

[20]  David P. Schmidt,et al.  Improving the Numerical Accuracy of Spray Simulations , 2002 .

[21]  Eberhard von Berg,et al.  Coupled Simulations of Nozzle Flow, Primary Fuel Jet Breakup, and Spray Formation , 2005 .

[22]  R. Reitz,et al.  Simulating cavitating liquid jets using a compressible and equilibrium two-phase flow solver , 2014 .

[23]  Christopher F. Powell,et al.  Time Resolved, Three Dimensional Mass Distribution of Diesel Sprays Measured with X-Ray Radiography , 2009 .

[24]  David P. Schmidt,et al.  Diesel spray CFD simulations based on the sigma-Y eulerian atomization model , 2013 .

[25]  Christopher J. Rutland,et al.  A FULLY COMPRESSIBLE, TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODEL OF SMALL, HIGH-SPEED, CAVITATING NOZZLES , 1999 .

[26]  David P. Schmidt.  Theoretical analysis for achieving high‐order spatial accuracy in Lagrangian/Eulerian source terms , 2006 .

[27]  Julien Reveillon,et al.  LARGE EDDY SIMULATION OF LIQUID JET ATOMIZATION , 2011 .

[28]  P. K. Senecal,et al.  LARGE EDDY SIMULATION OF FUEL-SPRAY UNDER NON-REACTING IC ENGINE CONDITIONS , 2013 .

[29]  Carlo N. Grimaldi,et al.  Numerical analysis of injector flow and spray characteristics from diesel injectors using fossil and biodiesel fuels , 2012 .

[30]  R. Reitz,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Fuel Spray Characteristics on Diesel Engine Combustion and Emission , 1998 .

[31]  Bing Hu,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of Vaporizing Sprays Considering Multi-Injection Averaging and Grid-Convergent Mesh Resolution , 2013 .

[32]  P. K. Senecal,et al.  Grid-Convergent Spray Models for Internal Combustion Engine Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations , 2014 .

[33]  F. J. Salvador,et al.  Effect of turbulence model and inlet boundary condition on the Diesel spray behavior simulated by an Eulerian Spray Atomization (ESA) model , 2014 .

[34]  Song-Charng Kong,et al.  DISI Spray Modeling Using Local Mesh Refinement , 2008 .

[35]  J. Kestin,et al.  Physical aspects of the relaxation model in two-phase flow , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[36]  J. Dukowicz.  A particle-fluid numerical model for liquid sprays , 1980 .

[37]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Liquid-Phase Fuel Penetration in Diesel Sprays , 1998 .

[38]  Olivier Simonin,et al.  MULTIDIMENSIONAL SIMULATION OF CAVITATING FLOWS IN DIESEL INJECTORS BY A HOMOGENEOUS MIXTURE MODELING APPROACH , 2008 .

[39]  B. Duret,et al.  Improving primary atomization modeling through DNS of two-phase flows , 2013 .

[40]  R. Reitz,et al.  Modeling the effects of drop drag and breakup on fuel sprays. Technical paper , 1993 .

[41]  F. X. Demoulin,et al.  A new model for turbulent flows with large density fluctuations : application to liquid atomization , 2007 .

[42]  P. K. Senecal,et al.  An Investigation of Grid Convergence for Spray Simulations using an LES Turbulence Model , 2013 .

[43]  S. Som,et al.  Effects of primary breakup modeling on spray and combustion characteristics of compression ignition engines , 2010 .

[44]  Christopher F. Powell,et al.  Development and Validation of a Primary Breakup Model for Diesel Engine Applications , 2009 .

[45]  F. J. Salvador,et al.  Using spray momentum flux measurements to understand the influence of diesel nozzle geometry on spray characteristics , 2005 .

[46]  P. Senecal,et al.  Validation of a Three-Dimensional Internal Nozzle Flow Model Including Automatic Mesh Generation and Cavitation Effects , 2013 .

[47]  Caroline L. Genzale,et al.  Comparison of Diesel Spray Combustion in Different High-Temperature, High-Pressure Facilities , 2010 .

[48]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  An explanation of the turbulent round-jet/plane-jet anomaly , 1978 .

[49]  S. Cheong,et al.  X-Ray Absorption Measurements of Diesel Sprays and the Effects of Nozzle Geometry , 2004 .

[50]  Christopher F. Powell,et al.  TIME-RESOLVED X-RAY RADIOGRAPHY OF SPRAYS FROM ENGINE COMBUSTION NETWORK SPRAY A DIESEL INJECTORS , 2014 .

[51]  R. Reitz,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Diesel Sprays Using an Eulerian-Lagrangian Spray and Atomization (ELSA) Model Coupled with Nozzle Flow , 2011 .

[52]  Nathaniel Trask,et al.  Compressible Modeling of the Internal Two-Phase Flow in a Gas-Centered Swirl Coaxial Fuel Injector , 2012 .

[53]  A. Kastengren,et al.  Spray density measurements using X-ray radiography , 2007 .

[54]  W. Bergwerk,et al.  Flow Pattern in Diesel Nozzle Spray Holes , 1959 .

[55]  Mark Linne,et al.  Ballistic imaging of the near field in a diesel spray , 2006 .

[56]  Song-Charng Kong,et al.  Modeling Diesel Spray Flame Liftoff, Sooting Tendency, and NOx Emissions Using Detailed Chemistry With Phenomenological Soot Model , 2007 .

[57]  L. Pickett,et al.  Numerical Simulations of Supersonic Diesel Spray Injection and the Induced Shock Waves , 2014 .

[58]  C Cemil Bekdemir,et al.  Predicting diesel combustion characteristics with Large-Eddy Simulations including tabulated chemical kinetics , 2013 .

[59]  Paul W. Nyholm,et al.  Engine combustion network. , 2010 .

[60]  Michele Battistoni,et al.  Comparison of Mixture and Multifluid Models for In-Nozzle Cavitation Prediction , 2014 .

[61]  F. X. Demoulin,et al.  Coupling Vaporization Model With the Eulerian-Lagrangian Spray Atomization (ELSA) Model in Diesel Engine Conditions , 2005 .

[62]  Mario F. Trujillo,et al.  KIVA-4: An unstructured ALE code for compressible gas flow with sprays , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[63]  Song-Charng Kong,et al.  Development of adaptive mesh refinement scheme for engine spray simulations , 2009 .

[64]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  AN EULERIAN-LAGRANGIAN SPRAY AND ATOMIZATION MODEL WITH IMPROVED TURBULENCE MODELING , 2009 .

[65]  Daniel C. Haworth,et al.  Adaptive grid refinement using cell-level and global imbalances , 1997 .

[66]  R. Reitz,et al.  Structure of High-Pressure Fuel Sprays , 1987 .

[67]  Christopher F. Powell,et al.  The Effects of Diesel Injector Needle Motion on Spray Structure , 2009 .

[68]  Christopher F. Powell,et al.  X-ray radiography measurements of diesel spray structure at engine-like ambient density. , 2009 .

[69]  R. Tatschl,et al.  PRIMARY BREAK-UP MODEL FOR DIESEL JETS BASED ON LOCALLY RESOLVED FLOW FIELD IN THE INJECTION HOLE , 2002 .

[70]  Christopher J. Rutland,et al.  Reducing grid dependency in droplet collision modeling , 2001 .

[71]  P. K. Senecal,et al.  A New Parallel Cut-Cell Cartesian CFD Code for Rapid Grid Generation Applied to In-Cylinder Diesel Engine Simulations , 2007 .

[72]  A. A. Amsden,et al.  KIVA-II: A Computer Program for Chemically Reactive Flows with Sprays , 1989 .

[73]  Christopher J. Rutland,et al.  A new droplet collision algorithm , 2000 .

[74]  Sibendu Som,et al.  Effect of nozzle orifice geometry on spray, combustion, and emission characteristics under diesel engine conditions , 2011 .