Bidirectional clear speech perception benefit for native and high-proficiency non-native talkers and listeners: intelligibility and accentedness.

This study investigated how native language background interacts with speaking style adaptations in determining levels of speech intelligibility. The aim was to explore whether native and high proficiency non-native listeners benefit similarly from native and non-native clear speech adjustments. The sentence-in-noise perception results revealed that fluent non-native listeners gained a large clear speech benefit from native clear speech modifications. Furthermore, proficient non-native talkers in this study implemented conversational-to-clear speaking style modifications in their second language (L2) that resulted in significant intelligibility gain for both native and non-native listeners. The results of the accentedness ratings obtained for native and non-native conversational and clear speech sentences showed that while intelligibility was improved, the presence of foreign accent remained constant in both speaking styles. This suggests that objective intelligibility and subjective accentedness are two independent dimensions of non-native speech. Overall, these results provide strong evidence that greater experience in L2 processing leads to improved intelligibility in both production and perception domains. These results also demonstrated that speaking style adaptations along with less signal distortion can contribute significantly towards successful native and non-native interactions.

[1]  R. Stibbard,et al.  Evidence against the mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit hypothesis. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Jean C. Krause,et al.  Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: the effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Tracey M. Derwing,et al.  ACCENT, INTELLIGIBILITY, AND COMPREHENSIBILITY , 1997, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[4]  Maria Uther,et al.  Do you speak E-NG-L-I-SH? A comparison of foreigner- and infant-directed speech , 2007, Speech Commun..

[5]  Tessa Bent,et al.  The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  D J Schum,et al.  Intelligibility of clear and conversational speech of young and elderly talkers. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[7]  Ann R. Bradlow,et al.  Stability of temporal contrasts across speaking styles in English and Croatian , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[8]  G. Yeni-Komshian,et al.  The effects of speaker accent and target predictability on perception of mispronunciations. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[9]  Murray J. Munro,et al.  Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege , 2007, Phonetica.

[10]  M. Picheny,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing , 1979 .

[11]  Tracey M. Derwing,et al.  Processing Time, Accent, and Comprehensibility in the Perception of Native and Foreign-Accented Speech , 1995, Language and speech.

[12]  Ocke-Schwen Bohn,et al.  The Production of New and Similar Vowels by Adult German Learners of English , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[13]  G. Studebaker.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  S. H. Ferguson,et al.  Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Ulrike Gut,et al.  Different manifestations and perceptions of foreign accent in intonation , 2007 .

[16]  S. G. Guion,et al.  Clear speech production of Korean stops: changing phonetic targets and enhancement strategies. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Ann R. Bradlow.  Confluent talker- and listener-oriented forces in clear speech production , 2002 .

[18]  J S Perkell,et al.  Variation in anticipatory coarticulation with changes in clarity and rate. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[19]  W. Strange.  Speech perception and linguistic experience : issues in cross-language research , 1995 .

[20]  Ann R Bradlow,et al.  Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  T. Houtgast,et al.  Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Sander J. van Wijngaarden,et al.  Intelligibility of native and non-native Dutch speech , 2001, Speech Commun..

[23]  Nina Kraus,et al.  Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[24]  C. Best,et al.  Nonnative and second-language speech perception : commonalities and complementarities , 2007 .

[25]  J. Jerger.  Clear speech. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[26]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Confluent talker- and listener-oriented forces in clear speech production , 2002 .

[27]  Ocke-Schwen Bohn,et al.  Perception and production of a new vowel category by adult second language learners , 1997 .

[28]  Tessa Bent,et al.  The clear speech effect for non-native listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Tracey M. Derwing,et al.  Foreign Accent, Comprehensibility, and Intelligibility in the Speech of Second Language Learners , 1995 .

[30]  Jean-Pierre Gagné,et al.  Auditory, visual and audiovisual clear speech , 2002, Speech Commun..

[31]  David Birdsong,et al.  A developmental study of English vowel production and perception by native Korean adults and children , 2005, J. Phonetics.

[32]  Ann R. Bradlow,et al.  Speaking and Hearing Clearly: Talker and Listener Factors in Speaking Style Changes , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[33]  D. Kewley-Port,et al.  Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Tracey M. Derwing,et al.  Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication , 2008, Language Teaching.

[35]  Lisa Davidson,et al.  Phonology, phonetics, or frequency: Influences on the production of non-native sequences , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[36]  J. C. Krause,et al.  Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Tracey M. Derwing,et al.  THE MUTUAL INTELLIGIBILITY OF L2 SPEECH , 2006, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[38]  M. Picheny,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[39]  Laurence White,et al.  Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[40]  Joan Besing,et al.  Effects of bilingualism, noise, and reverberation on speech perception by listeners with normal hearing , 2006, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[41]  S Buus,et al.  Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[42]  J. Perkell,et al.  Economy of effort in different speaking conditions. I. A preliminary study of intersubject differences and modeling issues. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  L. Braida,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[44]  N I Durlach,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. III: An attempt to determine the contribution of speaking rate to differences in intelligibility between clear and conversational speech. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[45]  L. Nygaard,et al.  Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented speech. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  Y. Tohkura,et al.  A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes , 2003, Cognition.

[47]  Sandra Gordon-Salant,et al.  Recognition of accented English in quiet by younger normal-hearing listeners and older listeners with normal-hearing and hearing loss. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  Susan G. Guion,et al.  Prosody in second language acquisition: Acoustic analyses of duration and F0 range , 2007 .

[49]  A. Jongman,et al.  Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  Catherine L. Rogers,et al.  Conversational and clear speech intelligibility of /bVd/ syllables produced by native and non-native English speakers. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  Diane Kewley-Port,et al.  Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[52]  Murray J. Munro,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF NOISE ON THE INTELLIGIBILITY OF FOREIGN-ACCENTED SPEECH , 1998, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[53]  J. Flege.  Second Language Speech Learning Theory , Findings , and Problems , 2006 .

[54]  Sheng Liu,et al.  Clear speech perception in acoustic and electric hearing. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  Ann R Bradlow,et al.  Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.