Non-linear compensation and displacement control of the bias-rate-dependent hysteresis of a magnetostrictive actuator

Abstract Magnetostrictive actuators invariably exhibit bias-rate-dependent hysteresis, which could cause vibration and error in the micro-positioning control. We present a methodology for linearization control for the hysteresis of a magnetostrictive actuator with a wide range of input rates and biases. The hysteresis compensation is attained through application of a dynamic Bouc-Wen model and experimental measured hysteresis properties of the magnetostrictive actuator under inputs with different frequencies and biases. The effectiveness of the compensator for hysteresis is demonstrated through experimental results of the magnetostrictive actuator under inputs at different frequencies and bias levels. Based on the proposed compensator, a displacement PID controller is applied to force the output displacement of the magnetostrictive actuator to track the desired displacement accurately thereafter. The maximum absolute tracking errors is 0.052 μm. Compared to the control results without the compensator, the compensator can reduce the control error by about 85%. The results indicate that this study provides an effective method which can compensate the hysteresis of the magnetostrictive actuator under different frequencies and biases of inputs.

[1]  O. Bottauscio,et al.  Modeling the Dynamic Behavior of Magnetostrictive Actuators , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[2]  S. Karunanidhi,et al.  Design, analysis and simulation of magnetostrictive actuator and its application to high dynamic servo valve , 2010 .

[3]  D. Davino,et al.  Phenomenological dynamic model of a magnetostrictive actuator , 2004 .

[4]  Ferruccio Resta,et al.  A model of magnetostrictive actuators for active vibration control , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[5]  Aihua Meng,et al.  Modeling of Terfenol-D Biased Minor Hysteresis Loops , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[6]  Marc Kamlah,et al.  A constitutive model for ferroelectric PZT ceramics under uniaxial loading , 1999 .

[7]  J.A. De Abreu-Garcia,et al.  Tracking control of a piezoceramic actuator with hysteresis compensation using inverse Preisach model , 2005, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[8]  Omar Aljanaideh,et al.  Rate-bias-dependent hysteresis modeling of a magnetostrictive transducer , 2016 .

[9]  John S. Baras,et al.  Modeling and control of hysteresis in magnetostrictive actuators , 2004, Autom..

[10]  Ciro Visone,et al.  Hysteresis modelling and compensation for smart sensors and actuators , 2008 .

[11]  Y. Wen Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems , 1976 .

[12]  Thomas J. Royston,et al.  Modeling piezoceramic transducer hysteresis in the structural vibration control problem , 2000 .

[13]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Modeling and control of a two-axis fast steering mirror with piezoelectric stack actuators for laser beam tracking , 2015 .

[14]  Elias B. Kosmatopoulos,et al.  Development of adaptive modeling techniques for non-linear hysteretic systems , 2002 .

[15]  Xiaoting Rui,et al.  Transfer matrix method for multibody systems for piezoelectric stack actuators , 2014 .

[16]  G. Srinivasan,et al.  Theory of low-frequency magnetoelectric coupling in magnetostrictive-piezoelectric bilayers , 2003, cond-mat/0307264.

[17]  Chun-Yi Su,et al.  Development of the rate-dependent Prandtl–Ishlinskii model for smart actuators , 2008 .

[18]  Shiuh-Jer Huang,et al.  Optimal LuGre friction model identification based on genetic algorithm and sliding mode control of a piezoelectric-actuating table , 2009 .

[19]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Hysteresis modeling and displacement control of piezoelectric actuators with the frequency-dependent behavior using a generalized Bouc–Wen model , 2016 .