Wither agricultural DSS

Computer-based agricultural decision support systems (aDSS) may be argued to have passed sequentially through phases of unbelief, euphoria and disappointment, and to be currently passing into either a phase of maturity with realistic expectations of the technology, or to abandonment. This paper appraises, in the context of the DSS development literature, our past and current efforts in decision support using simulation-models and farm-scale case-studies. The paper first reviews some of the explanations for the lack of success for aDSS including the identification of suitable roles and how best the tools may be deployed. The paper then outlines the authors' experiences during the euphoric period of aDSS development including the undertaking of market research on the nature of the aDSS desired and their potential for commercialisation. The positive outcome of the market research was that potential end-users recognised the range of functionality that an aDSS could offer. There was, however, significant scepticism on the balance of costs and benefits. The end-user preference for aDSS delivered as software products for use in-house, when combined with the limits on the price-per-unit that the market would bear, meant that there was little commercial potential. In the light of these findings the team re-evaluated the role and development strategy for their aDSS. The paper outlines this strategy in terms of both the technical developments of the aDSS and the approach to its use with stakeholders. The paper then discusses the legacy from the euphoric period highlighting a number of socio-political and institutional barriers to the use of aDSS which remain to be overcome. The paper concludes by arguing that there is a need to think beyond technocentric solutions to overcome the barriers to wider aDSS use and that there are a number of models of best-practice for aDSS development that can ensure their relevance.

[1]  Felix Rauschmayer,et al.  Evaluating deliberative and analytical methods for the resolution of environmental conflicts , 2006 .

[2]  K. B. Matthews,et al.  Evaluating labour requirements within a multi-objective land-use planning tool , 2003 .

[3]  Alan Irwin,et al.  The Received Wisdom:: Opening Up Expert Advice , 2006 .

[4]  R. L. McCown,et al.  Changing systems for supporting farmers' decisions: problems, paradigms, and prospects , 2002 .

[5]  Francis Harvey,et al.  Boundary Objects and the Social Construction of GIS Technology , 1998 .

[6]  Geoff A. Wilson,et al.  The Australian Landcare movement: towards ‘post-productivist’ rural governance? , 2004 .

[7]  Simon French,et al.  The varied contexts of environmental decision problems and their implications for decision support , 2005 .

[8]  M. Thompson,et al.  Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World: Governance, Politics and Plural Perceptions , 2006 .

[9]  M. Rivington,et al.  An Integrated Modelling Approach to Conduct Multifactorial Analyses on the Impacts of Climate Change on Whole-farm Systems. , 2004 .

[10]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Panarchy Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2002 .

[11]  Keith Matthews,et al.  Bridging the Design-use Gap for DSS in Environmental Policy and Practice. , 2006 .

[12]  Susan Craw,et al.  Combining deliberative and computer-based methods for multi-objective land-use planning , 2006 .

[13]  A. R. Sibbald,et al.  Integration of forestry and agriculture—A model , 1979 .

[14]  A. D. Shulman,et al.  Case Studies in Increasing the Adoption of Sustainable Resource Management Practices , 2000 .

[15]  M. Robertson,et al.  The FARMSCAPE approach to decision support: farmers', advisers', researchers' monitoring, simulation, communication and performance evaluation , 2002 .

[16]  Peter J. Thorburn,et al.  Sociological concepts for understanding agricultural decision support systems , 2004 .

[17]  R. Mccown Locating agricultural decision support systems in the troubled past and socio-technical complexity of 'models for management' , 2002 .

[18]  Nicholas J. Hutchings,et al.  A model of the grazing of hill vegetation by sheep in the UK. I. The prediction of vegetation biomass , 1997 .

[19]  R. Mccown,et al.  Learning to bridge the gap between science-based decision support and the practice of farming: Evolution in paradigms of model-based research and intervention from design to dialogue , 2001 .

[20]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[21]  Senthold Asseng,et al.  An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation , 2003 .

[22]  A.G.J.M. Oude Lansink,et al.  Integrated assessment of agricultural and environmental policies - towards a computerized framework for the EU (SEAMLESS-IF) , 2006 .

[23]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Decision support and expert systems , 1993 .

[24]  J. Dryzek Deliberative democracy and beyond : liberals, critics, contestations , 2000 .

[25]  Nicholas J. Hutchings,et al.  A model of the grazing of hill vegetation by sheep in the UK. II. The prediction of offtake by sheep , 1997 .

[26]  Kirsty Blackstock,et al.  Evaluating stakeholder involvement in river basin planning: a Scottish case study , 2007 .

[27]  Michael Thompson,et al.  The Case for Clumsiness , 2006 .

[28]  K. Matthews,et al.  Applying Genetic Algorithms to Land Use Planning. , 1999 .

[29]  R. Burton Seeing Through the ‘Good Farmer's’ Eyes: Towards Developing an Understanding of the Social Symbolic Value of ‘Productivist’ Behaviour , 2004 .

[30]  Susan Craw,et al.  Using soft-systems methods to evaluate the outputs from multi-objective land use planning tools , 2002 .

[31]  Stephen M. Redpath,et al.  Using Decision Modeling with Stakeholders to Reduce Human–Wildlife Conflict: a Raptor–Grouse Case Study , 2004 .

[32]  Volker Nissen,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms in Management Applications , 1995 .

[33]  K. Matthews,et al.  Implementation of a spatial decision support system for rural land use planning: integrating GIS and environmental models with search and optimisation algorithms , 1999 .

[34]  Susan Craw,et al.  Implementation of a spatial decision support system for rural land use planning: integrating geographic information system and environmental models with search and optimisation algorithms , 1999 .