Factors determining e-learning service quality

Abstract: e‐Learning courses are fast becoming common‐place, yet the success of these online courses varies considerably. Since limited research addresses the issue of e‐learning quality (ELQ) of service in higher education environments, there is an increasing need to effectively assess ELQ. In this paper, we argue that to obtain a satisfactory e‐learning student experience, we must offer more than access to learning material. The research proposes an extended SERVQUAL model, the ELQ model, which in addition to key service constructs, facilitates consideration of both information and system quality factors. Exploratory Factor Analysis is conducted to investigate the reliability and validity of the measurement model, and multiple regression analysis is used to test the research model. Data analysis reveals that Assurance, Responsiveness, Tangibility, Course Website and Learning Content have a positive correlation with the perception of ELQ. e‐Learning students value a stable, and easy to use e‐learning environment, yet do not perceive empathy and reliability as significant to student perception of ELQ. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing: Some Practical Reminders , 2008 .

[2]  F. Reichheld,et al.  E-LOYALTY: YOUR SECRET WEAPON ON THE WEB , 2003 .

[3]  Zongkai Yang,et al.  Research and development of web-based virtual online classroom , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Donna Gibbs,et al.  The upside-down-world of e-learning , 2012 .

[5]  Szu-Yuan Sun,et al.  Usability, quality, value and e-learning continuance decisions , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[6]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Zones of Tolerance: Alternative Scales for Measuring Information Systems Service Quality , 2005, MIS Q..

[7]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  An application of fuzzy AHP for evaluating course website quality , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[8]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[9]  R. Oliver.  A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions , 1980 .

[10]  Kamel Khoualdi,et al.  E-Learning as a Knowledge Management Approach for Intellectual Capital Utilization. , 2008 .

[11]  David F. McAllister,et al.  Providing education electronically to nontraditional sites: new delivery to a new audience , 1996, SIGDOC '96.

[12]  Vassilis Loumos,et al.  Dropout prediction in e-learning courses through the combination of machine learning techniques , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[13]  D. Bolliger.  Key Factors for Determining Student Satisfaction in Online Courses , 2004 .

[14]  Kai Yang,et al.  Design for Six Sigma , 2005 .

[15]  Murat Hismanoglu,et al.  VIEWS OF FRESHMEN STUDENTS ON FOREIGN LANGUAGE COURSES DELIVERED VIA E-LEARNING , 2016 .

[16]  Thomas M. Kelly,et al.  Managing Intellectual Capital — via E-Learning — at Cisco , 2003 .

[17]  Jos van Iwaarden,et al.  Perceptions about the quality of web sites: a survey amongst students at Northeastern University and Erasmus University , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Joseph Moses Juran,et al.  Product Quality-A Prescription for the West, Part I , 1981 .

[19]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Powering E-Learning In the New Millennium: An Overview of E-Learning and Enabling Technology , 2003, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[20]  Philip B. Crosby,et al.  Quality Is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain , 1979 .

[21]  Carol Jollie,et al.  Web based learning , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality , 1996 .

[23]  J. E. Swan,et al.  SERVQUAL revisited: a critical review of service quality , 1996 .

[24]  Buenafe R. Abdon,et al.  Multisectoral partnerships in e-learning: A potential force for improved human capital development in the Asia Pacific , 2001, Internet High. Educ..

[25]  Allyson Hadwin,et al.  Measurement and assessment in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  J. Ramalho-Santos,et al.  Cronbach's alpha: a tool for assessing the reliability of scales , 1999 .

[27]  Thierry Volery,et al.  Critical success factors in online education , 2000 .

[28]  D. Diaz,et al.  Students' Learning Styles in Two Classes: Online Distance Learning and Equivalent On-Campus , 1999 .

[29]  Karen Swan,et al.  Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses , 2001 .

[30]  Godwin J. Udo,et al.  Factors Affecting E-Commerce Web Site Effectiveness , 2002, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Michael Cohen,et al.  Soft scissors: an interactive tool for realtime high quality matting , 2007, SIGGRAPH 2007.

[32]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  Riadh Ladhari,et al.  10 years of service quality measurement: reviewing the use of the SERVQUAL instrument , 2002, Cuadernos de difusión.

[34]  Dan Bouhnik,et al.  Interaction in distance-learning courses , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[35]  Michael Stodnick,et al.  Using SERVQUAL to Measure the Quality of the Classroom Experience , 2008 .

[36]  Robert K. L. Gay,et al.  A knowledge-driven model to personalize e-learning , 2006, JERC.

[37]  Yair Levy,et al.  Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[38]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[39]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[40]  Hassan M. Selim,et al.  Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[41]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  A consumer perspective of E-service quality , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[42]  L. Petruzzellis,et al.  STUDENT SATISFACTION AND QUALITY OF SERVICE IN ITALIAN UNIVERSITIES , 2006 .

[43]  Gary Klein,et al.  A Note on SERVQUAL Reliability and Validity in Information System Service Quality Measurement , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[44]  Virginio Cantoni,et al.  Perspectives and challenges in e-learning: towards natural interaction paradigms , 2004, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[45]  Mei Cao,et al.  B2C e-commerce web site quality: an empirical examination , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[46]  Alan Foley,et al.  The experiences of students with learning disabilities in a higher education virtual campus , 2013 .

[47]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  The role of perceived user-interface design in continued usage intention of self-paced e-learning tools , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[48]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding Web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[49]  Hsiu-Li Liao,et al.  Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[50]  Kallol Kumar Bagchi,et al.  Using SERVQUAL to assess the quality of e-learning experience , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  R. Peterson.  A Meta-analysis of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha , 1994 .

[52]  Graham Bradley,et al.  Measuring the performance of IT services: An assessment of SERVQUAL , 2002, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Annika Andersson,et al.  Seven major challenges for e-learning in developing countries: Case study eBIT, Sri Lanka , 2008 .