Policy Processes for Low Carbon Innovation in the UK: Successes, failures and lessons

This paper analyses recent, current and potential future relations between policy processes and substantive outcomes in UK low carbon innovation policy. It examines the development of policy processes relating to the adoption and implementation of the Renewables Obligation and how these may affect the current and likely future success of the Obligation in promoting low carbon innovation. It looks at the new policy and institutional processes put in place in the 2003 Energy White Paper and argues that these are unlikely to provide the strategic long-term framework needed to realize the ambitious goals for UK energy policy set out in the White Paper. Finally, it outlines some suggestions for further development of policy processes to facilitate improved delivery of these goals, based on guiding principles for sustainable innovation policy processes, developed by the authors and colleagues.

[1]  Shimon Awerbuch,et al.  Restructuring our electricity networks to promote decarbonisation , 2004 .

[2]  Georg Aichholzer,et al.  Technology Policy: Towards an Integration of Social and Ecological Concerns , 1994 .

[3]  Keith Smith.  Innovation as a Systemic Phenomenon: Rethinking the Role of Policy , 2000 .

[4]  T. Foxon,et al.  Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime , 2008 .

[5]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Interactions between the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and the UK Renewables Obligation and Energy Efficiency Commitment , 2003 .

[6]  R. Rhodes.  Understanding governance : policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability , 1997 .

[7]  Colin Thirtle,et al.  Policy drivers and barriers for sustainable innovation , 2005 .

[8]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Total cost estimates for large-scale wind scenarios in UK , 2004 .

[9]  Gregory C. Unruh.  Escaping carbon lock-in , 2002 .

[10]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Innovation Policy - A Systemic Approach , 2001 .

[11]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[12]  Dieter Helm,et al.  Energy, the State, and the Market: British Energy Policy since 1979 , 2003 .

[13]  R. Gross,et al.  UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures , 2005 .

[14]  Georg Aichholzer,et al.  Technology Policy: The Interaction between Governments and Markets , 1994 .

[15]  Steve Sorrell,et al.  The evolution of emissions trading in the EU: tensions between national trading schemes and the proposed EU directive , 2003 .

[16]  E. Andersen,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[17]  S. Awerbuch.  Portfolio-Based Electricity Generation Planning: Policy Implications For Renewables And Energy Security , 2006 .

[18]  Jake Chapman,et al.  System Failure: Why Governments Must Learn to Think Differently , 2002 .

[19]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  Renewable energy policy in the UK 1990-2003 , 2004 .

[20]  Gregory C. Unruh.  Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[21]  Marianne van der Steen,et al.  Evolutionary Systems of Innovations: A Veblian-Oriented Study into the Role of the Government Factor , 1999 .

[22]  P. Pierson.  Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[23]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Harnessing community energies: explaining community based localism in renewable energy policy in the UK , 2007 .

[24]  Peter John,et al.  Analysing Public Policy , 1998 .

[25]  Dennis Anderson,et al.  Uncertainties in Responding to Climate Change: On the Economic Value of Technology Policies for Reducing Costs and Creating Options , 2001 .

[26]  R. Kemp,et al.  The Management of the Co-Evolution of Technical, Environmental and Social Systems , 2005 .

[27]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[28]  M. Grubb.  Technology Innovation and Climate Change Policy: an overview of issues and options , 2004 .

[29]  K. Green.  National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .

[30]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany , 2006 .

[31]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  The UK Emissions Trading Scheme: Paying the Polluter? A Policy Experiment , 2004 .