Coronary CT angiography: current status and continuing challenges.

Coronary CT angiography has been increasingly used in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease owing to rapid technological developments, which are reflected in the improved spatial and temporal resolution of the images. High diagnostic accuracy has been achieved with multislice CT scanners (64 slice and higher), and in selected patients coronary CT angiography is regarded as a reliable alternative to invasive coronary angiography. With high-quality coronary CT imaging increasingly being performed, patients can benefit from an imaging modality that provides a rapid and accurate diagnosis while avoiding an invasive procedure. Despite the tremendous contributions of coronary CT angiography to cardiac imaging, study results reported in the literature should be interpreted with caution as there are some limitations existing within the study design or related to patient risk factors. In addition, some attention must be given to the potential health risks associated with the ionising radiation received during cardiac CT examinations. Radiation dose associated with coronary CT angiography has raised serious concerns in the literature, as the risk of developing malignancy is not negligible. Various dose-saving strategies have been implemented, with some of the strategies resulting in significant dose reduction. The aim of this review is to present an overview of the role of coronary CT angiography on cardiac imaging, with focus on coronary artery disease in terms of the diagnostic and prognostic value of coronary CT angiography. Various approaches for dose reduction commonly recommended in the literature are discussed. Limitations of coronary CT angiography are identified. Finally, future directions and challenges with the use of coronary CT angiography are highlighted.

[1]  Zhonghua Sun,et al.  Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[2]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Dual-step prospective ECG-triggered 128-slice dual-source CT for evaluation of coronary arteries and cardiac function without heart rate control: a technical note , 2010, European Radiology.

[3]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose , 2008, European Radiology.

[4]  E. Halpern,et al.  Evaluation of a "triple rule-out" coronary CT angiography protocol: use of 64-Section CT in low-to-moderate risk emergency department patients suspected of having acute coronary syndrome. , 2008, Radiology.

[5]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. , 2010, European heart journal.

[6]  K. Ng,et al.  Multislice CT angiography in cardiac imaging. Part III: radiation risk and dose reduction. , 2010, Singapore medical journal.

[7]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  M. Reiser,et al.  Saving Dose in Triple-Rule-Out Computed Tomography Examination Using a High-Pitch Dual Spiral Technique , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[9]  L Desbiolles,et al.  Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance , 2008, Heart.

[10]  Zhonghua Sun,et al.  Diagnostic value of multislice computed tomography angiography in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[11]  Marcel van Straten,et al.  Impact of heart rate frequency and variability on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance in dual-source spiral CT coronary angiography. , 2009, Radiology.

[12]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation , 2002, European Radiology.

[13]  V. Treyer,et al.  First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography , 2009, Heart.

[14]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of coronary MDCT in the triage of patients with acute chest pain. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  P. Khong,et al.  Radiation dose and cancer risk in retrospectively and prospectively ECG-gated coronary angiography using 64-slice multidetector CT. , 2010, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  C. McCollough,et al.  Relationship between noise, dose, and pitch in cardiac multi-detector row CT. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[17]  J. Paul,et al.  Strategies for reduction of radiation dose in cardiac multislice CT , 2007, European Radiology.

[18]  K. Kofoed,et al.  Prognostic value of absence or presence of coronary artery disease determined by 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[19]  S. Abbara Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition , 2010 .

[20]  B. Hamm,et al.  Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by 320-Row Computed Tomography With Lower Radiation Exposure and Maintained Diagnostic Accuracy: Comparison of Results With Cardiac Catheterization in a Head-to-Head Pilot Investigation , 2009, Circulation.

[21]  Zhonghua Sun,et al.  Multislice CT angiography in cardiac imaging. Part II: clinical applications in coronary artery disease. , 2010, Singapore medical journal.

[22]  K. Sim,et al.  Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: influence of calcification. , 2006, American heart journal.

[23]  Zhonghua Sun,et al.  Diagnostic value of 64-slice CT angiography in coronary artery disease: a systematic review. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[24]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  N. Paul,et al.  Perioperative β-Blockers : Use With Caution Perioperative β Blockers in Patients Having Non-Cardiac Surgery : A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[26]  Jae Hyung Park,et al.  The Image Quality and Radiation Dose of 100-kVp versus 120-kVp ECG-Gated 16-Slice CT Coronary Angiography , 2009, Korean journal of radiology.

[27]  W. Kalender,et al.  Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience , 2009, European Radiology.

[28]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Radiation Dose Estimates From Cardiac Multislice Computed Tomography in Daily Practice: Impact of Different Scanning Protocols on Effective Dose Estimates , 2006, Circulation.

[29]  A. Mahnken,et al.  Multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. , 2003, International journal of cardiology.

[30]  C. Roobottom,et al.  Prognostic value of coronary multidetector CT angiography in patients with an intermediate probability of significant coronary heart disease. , 2010, The British journal of radiology.

[31]  Steen Z Abildstrom,et al.  64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2007, European heart journal.

[32]  Commentary. Radiation dose in CT: are we meeting the challenge? , 2002 .

[33]  B. Hamm,et al.  Low-dose triple-rule-out using 320-row-detector volume MDCT – less contrast medium and lower radiation exposure , 2011, European Radiology.

[34]  James A Brink,et al.  Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. , 2004, Radiology.

[35]  M. Reiser,et al.  Image Quality, Motion Artifacts, and Reconstruction Timing of 64-Slice Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography With 0.33-Second Rotation Speed , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[36]  D. Horstkotte,et al.  Non-invasive coronary angiography: the clinical value of multi-slice computed tomography in the assessment of patients with prior coronary bypass surgery , 2009, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[37]  P. Stein,et al.  Usefulness of 4-, 8-, and 16-slice computed tomography for detection of graft occlusion or patency after coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2005, American Journal of Cardiology.

[38]  Icrp Preface, Executive Summary and Glossary , 2007 .

[39]  Mark Kelemen,et al.  Chest pain evaluation in the emergency department: can MDCT provide a comprehensive evaluation? , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[40]  Dieter Ropers,et al.  Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[41]  Stephen Schroeder,et al.  Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: initial clinical results. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[42]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  ACC/AHA/SCAI Practice Guidelines, February 21, 2006 , 2006 .

[43]  William Wijns,et al.  Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis. , 2007, Radiology.

[44]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Effect of a standardized radiation dose reduction protocol on diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomographic angiography. , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.

[45]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. , 2009, JAMA.

[46]  J. Tobis,et al.  Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[47]  J. H. Kinsey,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging of heart, lungs, and circulation. , 1980, Science.

[48]  N. Bellenger,et al.  A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography , 2010, Heart.

[49]  Andrew E Arai,et al.  Radiation Dose from Single-Heartbeat Coronary CT Angiography Performed with a 320 – Detector Row Volume Scanner 1 , 2010 .

[50]  G. Raff,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[51]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[52]  E. Seppi,et al.  Stop-action cardiac computed tomography. , 1977, Radiology.

[53]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Coronary artery disease: which degree of coronary artery stenosis is indicative of ischemia? , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[54]  E. Hecht,et al.  Dual-source versus single-source cardiac CT angiography: comparison of diagnostic image quality. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[55]  C. Herzog,et al.  Does two-segment image reconstruction at 64-section CT coronary angiography improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy? , 2007, Radiology.

[56]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2005 .

[57]  C. Claussen,et al.  Dual-source CT: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. , 2008, Radiology.

[58]  S. Golding,et al.  Commentary. Radiation dose in CT: are we meeting the challenge? , 2002, The British journal of radiology.

[59]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. , 2010, European heart journal.

[60]  Natalie N. Braun,et al.  Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. , 2009, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[61]  Y. Arad,et al.  Comparison of electron beam computed tomography scanning and conventional risk factor assessment for the prediction of angiographic coronary artery disease. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[62]  Zhonghua Sun,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64 multislice CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[63]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[64]  Ting-Yim Lee,et al.  Impact of new technologies on dose reduction in CT. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[65]  A. Taştan,et al.  Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[66]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Triple rule-out CT in the emergency department: protocols and spectrum of imaging findings , 2009, European Radiology.

[67]  J. Haaga,et al.  Radiation dose management: weighing risk versus benefit. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[68]  M. Reiser,et al.  Dual-source CT for chest pain assessment , 2007, European Radiology.

[69]  Gabriel P. Krestin,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris , 2006, European Radiology.

[70]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Low-dose CT and cardiac MR for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: accuracy of single and combined approaches , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[71]  N. Nakamura,et al.  Evaluation of characteristics and degree of remodeling in coronary atherosclerotic lesions by 64-detector multislice computed tomography (MSCT). , 2009, Atherosclerosis.

[72]  A. Schmermund,et al.  Use of automatic exposure control in multislice computed tomography of the coronaries: comparison of 16-slice and 64-slice scanner data with conventional coronary angiography , 2007, Heart.

[73]  Kelley R Branch,et al.  Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. , 2008, Radiology.

[74]  P. Cascade,et al.  The American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria. Will they be useful for us? , 1996, Chest.

[75]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. , 2007, European heart journal.

[76]  J. Min,et al.  The prognostic value of multidetector coronary CT angiography for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events: a multicenter observational cohort study , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[77]  M. Reiser,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. , 2007, European heart journal.

[78]  H. Otero,et al.  Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography , 2008, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[79]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Triple rule-out CT in patients with suspicion of acute pulmonary embolism: findings and accuracy. , 2009, Academic radiology.

[80]  Maria Siebes,et al.  Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology. , 2006, Circulation.

[81]  W. Bautz,et al.  Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. , 2006, European heart journal.

[82]  Herbert Bruder,et al.  Advances in cardiac imaging with 16-section CT systems. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[83]  Dirk Ertel,et al.  Cardiac spiral dual-source CT with high pitch: a feasibility study , 2009, European Radiology.

[84]  J. Rumberger,et al.  Long-Term Prognostic Value of Coronary Calcification Detected by Electron-Beam Computed Tomography in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography , 2002 .

[85]  J. Goldin,et al.  Detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities: standard dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography versus rest/stress technetium-99m single-photo emission CT. , 2010, The British journal of radiology.

[86]  C. Roobottom,et al.  Cardiac CT: are we underestimating the dose? A radiation dose study utilizing the 2007 ICRP tissue weighting factors and a cardiac specific scan volume. , 2010, Clinical radiology.

[87]  C D Claussen,et al.  Accuracy of dual-source CT in the characterisation of non-calcified plaque: use of a colour-coded analysis compared with virtual histology intravascular ultrasound. , 2009, The British journal of radiology.

[88]  I. Komuro,et al.  Utility of 256-slice cone beam tomography for real four-dimensional volumetric analysis without electrocardiogram gated acquisition. , 2007, International journal of cardiology.

[89]  Peter Libby,et al.  Current Concepts of the Pathogenesis of the Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2001, Circulation.

[90]  O. Buckley,et al.  Dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate or rhythm control in comparison with conventional coronary angiography , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[91]  G. Hillis,et al.  64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2008, Heart.

[92]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[93]  E. Halpern,et al.  Radiation dose in a "triple rule-out" coronary CT angiography protocol of emergency department patients using 64-MDCT: the impact of ECG-based tube current modulation on age, sex, and body mass index. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[94]  Akihiro Sato,et al.  Quantitative vascular measurements in arterial occlusive disease. , 2005, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[95]  L. Klein Acute coronary syndromes in young patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries. , 2006, American heart journal.

[96]  W. Bautz,et al.  Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency: assessment with high-resolution submillimeter 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) versus coronary angiography. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[97]  W. Heindel,et al.  Assessment of coronary arterial stents by multislice-CT angiography. , 2003, Acta radiologica.

[98]  E. J. Ha,et al.  Coronary Artery Disease in Asymptomatic Young Adults: Its Prevalence According to Coronary Artery Disease Risk Stratification and the CT Characteristics , 2010, Korean journal of radiology.

[99]  Werner Bautz,et al.  Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[100]  H. Rickli,et al.  Characteristics and prognosis of myocardial infarction in patients with normal coronary arteries. , 2000, Chest.

[101]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Source Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[102]  S. Achenbach Detection of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography: it's all about resolution. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[103]  Jonathan G Goldin,et al.  Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease by Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiolog , 2006, Circulation.

[104]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[105]  Division on Earth Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 , 2006 .

[106]  Scott D Flamm,et al.  Prognostic utility of 64-slice computed tomography in patients with suspected but no documented coronary artery disease. , 2008, European heart journal.

[107]  Matthias Stuber,et al.  Controversies in cardiovascular medicine series Imaging of the unstable plaque : how far have we got ? , 2009 .

[108]  Joseph P Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[109]  Matthijs Oudkerk,et al.  Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography , 2001, The Lancet.

[110]  M. Hadamitzky,et al.  Improved noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with 64-slice computed tomographic angiography in an unselected patient population. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[111]  M. Reiser,et al.  Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience , 2007, European Radiology.

[112]  M. Schneider-Kolsky,et al.  Image quality of coronary 320-MDCT in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[113]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  Cost effectiveness of coronary angiography and calcium scoring using CT and stress MRI for diagnosis of coronary artery disease , 2007, European Radiology.

[114]  Stephan Achenbach,et al.  Computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[115]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Dual-source versus 64-section CT coronary angiography at lower heart rates: comparison of accuracy and radiation dose. , 2009, Radiology.

[116]  T. Kido,et al.  Functional assessment of coronary artery flow using adenosine stress dual-energy CT: a preliminary study , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[117]  E. Wenkel,et al.  Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[118]  P J de Feyter,et al.  Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis , 2007, Heart.

[119]  U. Schoepf,et al.  Dual-energy CT of the heart--principles and protocols. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[120]  D. Andreini,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography: a comparison between prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram triggering. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[121]  A. Yeung,et al.  Impact of coronary artery remodeling on clinical presentation of coronary artery disease: an intravascular ultrasound study. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[122]  M. Budoff,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[123]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[124]  C. White,et al.  Coronary CT angiography in emergency department patients with acute chest pain: triple rule-out protocol versus dedicated coronary CT angiography , 2009, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[125]  Werner Moshage,et al.  Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses by Contrast-Enhanced, Retrospectively Electrocardiographically-Gated, Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography , 2001, Circulation.

[126]  J. Schuijf,et al.  Quantification of stenosis severity on multidetector row computed tomography. , 2010, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[127]  U. Schoepf,et al.  Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.