Why do Belgian Community Pharmacists Still Treat Electronic Prescriptions as Paper-Based?

Belgium is in a transition phase from paper-based prescriptions to electronic prescriptions (ePrescriptions) during which both the paper and electronic format are valid. Since patients still get a paper proof of the ePrescription, sometimes pharmacists use the ePrescription as paper-based prescription. When the government demands a complete dematerialization, i.e. no more paper-based prescriptions, this will no longer be possible. Therefore, we questioned the frequency and reasons for treating an ePrescription as paper-based. The logged interactions in the national database were used to identify possible reasons. The tarification service Koninklijk Limburgs Apothekers Verbond (KLAV) provided prescriptions of June 2018. KLAV supports tarification for community pharmacies all over Belgium, thereby providing a representative sample for the Belgian community pharmacies. A two-stage cluster random sampling technique was applied to retrieve a subset of 10,000 prescriptions. In this subset we identified 4961 ePrescriptions (49.61%) of which 226 (4.56%, in total 2.26%) were treated as paper-based. Reasons observed for this incorrect handling are (1) non-compliance of the community pharmacist; (2) errors in software or handling of the community pharmacist; (3) errors at the prescriber side or patient tries to fraud; (4) incorrectly revoking the ePrescription; and (5) errors in software of prescriber. The main reasons for treating ePrescriptions as paper-based are non-compliance of the community pharmacist (n = 124, 54.87%) by ignoring its digital nature, and errors in software or handling of the community pharmacist (n = 85, 37.61%). Future research is necessary to investigate user opinions and to measure the impact of introducing ePrescribing in the daily routine.

[1]  P. Mäntyselkä,et al.  Medication safety and the usability of electronic prescribing as perceived by physicians—A semistructured interview among primary health care physicians in Finland , 2017, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[2]  Jan Bruthans,et al.  The past and current state of the Czech outpatient electronic prescription (eRecept) , 2019, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[3]  Use of a national database as a tool to identify primary medication non‐adherence: The Estonian ePrescription system , 2017, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[4]  M. Samadbeik,et al.  A Copmarative Review of Electronic Prescription Systems: Lessons Learned from Developed Countries , 2017, Journal of research in pharmacy practice.

[5]  H. Bastiaens,et al.  Patient Perceptions of Electronic Prescriptions in Belgium: An Exploratory Policy Analysis , 2018, Pharmacy.

[6]  Monica Chiarini Tremblay,et al.  A review of the literature and proposed classification on e-prescribing: Functions, assimilation stages, benefits, concerns, and risks. , 2016, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[7]  A. Ekedahl,et al.  Problem prescriptions in Sweden necessitating contact with the prescriber before dispensing. , 2010, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[8]  Erin R. Holmes,et al.  Adoption of and experience with e-prescribing by primary care physicians. , 2013, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[9]  H. Sørensen,et al.  Data Resource Profile: The Danish National Prescription Registry , 2016, International journal of epidemiology.

[10]  Patrick Kierkegaard,et al.  E-Prescription across Europe , 2013 .

[11]  Habin Lee,et al.  A user satisfaction study of the NHS Online Prescription Prepayment Certificate , 2014 .