Cerium and light actinide compounds show widely varied f‐electron phenomena. The f‐electron behavior in these systems ranges from well‐localized to heavy‐fermion‐like or itinerant. Over a period of time we have been developing techniques to evaluate the fundamental interactions for correlated f‐electron systems, such as band‐f hybridization and band‐f exchange, and trying to understand their properties and trends in the evolution of the properties between different isostructural cerium and light actinide compounds on the basis of absolute first principle calculations. Previous calculations are successful in explaining a variety of f‐electron properties in cerium monopnictides and monochalcogenides. When going from localized f‐electron cerium systems to more itinerant f‐electron uranium systems, the hybridization between f‐ and non‐f‐conduction electrons is strongly enhanced by the self banding of the f states. We develop a scheme to evaluate the hybridization from the starting point that the f states are viewed as bands. We apply this scheme to uranium monopnictides and monochalcogenides to calculate their magnetic ordering.
[1]
B. Cooper,et al.
Absolute evaluation of combined hybridization‐induced and RKKY‐induced two‐ion interaction in correlated electron systems
,
1991
.
[2]
J. Wills,et al.
Basis of strong change of hybridization-induced magnetic ordering between CeSb and CeTe
,
1988
.
[3]
Cooper,et al.
Synthesis of band and model Hamiltonian theory for hybridizing cerium systems.
,
1987,
Physical review. B, Condensed matter.
[4]
A. J. Freeman,et al.
Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of the Actinides
,
1985
.
[5]
J. Villain,et al.
Phase diagram and magnetic structures of CeSb
,
1977
.
[6]
R. Birgeneau,et al.
Crystal Fields and the Effective-Point-Charge Model in the Rare-Earth Pnictides
,
1973
.