Quantifying the extent of emphysema: factors associated with radiologists' estimations and quantitative indices of emphysema severity using the ECLIPSE cohort.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES This study investigated what factors radiologists take into account when estimating emphysema severity and assessed quantitative computed tomography (CT) measurements of low attenuation areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS CT scans and spirometry were obtained on 1519 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) subjects, 269 smoker controls, and 184 nonsmoker controls from the Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Indentify Surrogate Endpoints (ECLIPSE) study. CT scans were analyzed using the threshold technique (%<-950HU) and a low attenuation cluster analysis. Two radiologists scored emphysema severity (0 to 5 scale), described the predominant type and distribution of emphysema, and the presence of suspected small airways disease. RESULTS The percent low attenuation area (%LAA) and visual scores of emphysema severity correlated well (r = 0.77, P < .001). %LAA, low attenuation cluster analysis, and absence of radiologist described gas trapping, distribution, and predominant type of emphysema were predictors of visual scores of emphysema severity (all P < .001). CT scans scored as showing regions of gas trapping had smaller lesions for a similar %LAA than those without (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Visual estimates of emphysema are not only determined by the extent of LAA, but also by lesion size, predominant type, and distribution of emphysema and presence/absence of areas of small airways disease. A computer analysis of low attenuation cluster size helps quantitative algorithms discriminate low attenuation areas from gas trapping, image noise, and emphysema.

[1]  J. Gurney,et al.  Regional distribution of emphysema: correlation of high-resolution CT with pulmonary function tests in unselected smokers. , 1992, Radiology.

[2]  Yasutaka Nakano,et al.  Airway wall thickening and emphysema show independent familial aggregation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2008, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[3]  P De Vuyst,et al.  Comparison of computed density and microscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. , 1996, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[4]  P. Paré,et al.  The diagnosis of emphysema. A computed tomographic-pathologic correlation. , 1986, The American review of respiratory disease.

[5]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Pulmonary emphysema: radiation dose and section thickness at multidetector CT quantification--comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry. , 2007, Radiology.

[6]  L. Edwards,et al.  Serum surfactant protein D is steroid sensitive and associated with exacerbations of COPD , 2009, European Respiratory Journal.

[7]  P. Paré,et al.  A quantification of the lung surface area in emphysema using computed tomography. , 1999, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[8]  Edwin K Silverman,et al.  Characterisation of COPD heterogeneity in the ECLIPSE cohort , 2010, Respiratory research.

[9]  L. Edwards,et al.  Evaluation of serum CC-16 as a biomarker for COPD in the ECLIPSE cohort , 2008, Thorax.

[10]  A. Dirksen,et al.  Short‐term reproducibility of computed tomography‐based lung density measurements in alpha‐1 antitrypsin deficiency and smokers with emphysema , 2004, Acta radiologica.

[11]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Pulmonary emphysema: objective quantification at multi-detector row CT--comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry. , 2006, Radiology.

[12]  N. Müller,et al.  "Density mask". An objective method to quantitate emphysema using computed tomography. , 1988, Chest.

[13]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[14]  J. A. Campbell,et al.  ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY. , 1965, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[15]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantification of pulmonary emphysema from lung computed tomography images. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[16]  P De Vuyst,et al.  Comparison of computed density and macroscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. , 1995, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[17]  B Suki,et al.  Complexity of terminal airspace geometry assessed by lung computed tomography in normal subjects and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Robert Wise,et al.  Predictors of mortality in patients with emphysema and severe airflow obstruction. , 2006, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[19]  J. Best,et al.  DIAGNOSIS OF PULMONARY EMPHYSEMA BY COMPUTERISED TOMOGRAPHY , 1984, The Lancet.

[20]  Eric A. Hoffman,et al.  Atlas-driven lung lobe segmentation in volumetric X-ray CT images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Gary G. Koch,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis Using The SAS1 System , 1995 .

[22]  A A Bankier,et al.  Pulmonary emphysema: subjective visual grading versus objective quantification with macroscopic morphometry and thin-section CT densitometry. , 1999, Radiology.

[23]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Pulmonary emphysema: size distribution of emphysematous spaces on multidetector CT images--comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry. , 2008, Radiology.

[24]  Nikkila Ea.  Letter: Serum high-density-lipoprotein and coronary heart-disease. , 1976 .

[25]  W. MacNee,et al.  Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate End-points (ECLIPSE) , 2008, European Respiratory Journal.

[26]  D. Hansell,et al.  Lung morphology in the elderly: comparative CT study of subjects over 75 years old versus those under 55 years old. , 2009, Radiology.

[27]  J. Best,et al.  CT measurements of lung density in life can quantitate distal airspace enlargement--an essential defining feature of human emphysema. , 1988, The American review of respiratory disease.

[28]  Raúl San José Estépar,et al.  Gender differences in the severity of CT emphysema in COPD. , 2007, Chest.

[29]  R H Hruban,et al.  High resolution computed tomography of inflation-fixed lungs. Pathologic-radiologic correlation of centrilobular emphysema. , 1987, The American review of respiratory disease.

[30]  H Nishitani,et al.  The diagnosis of mild emphysema. Correlation of computed tomography and pathology scores. , 1990, The American review of respiratory disease.

[31]  N. Müller,et al.  Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. , 2008, Radiology.

[32]  J. Clausen,et al.  Quantitation of emphysema with three-dimensional CT densitometry: comparison with two-dimensional analysis, visual emphysema scores, and pulmonary function test results. , 1999, Radiology.

[33]  F. Martinez,et al.  Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. , 2007, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[34]  K P Whittall,et al.  Selection of patients for lung volume reduction surgery using a power law analysis of the computed tomographic scan , 2003, Thorax.