Apparent remote synchronization of amplitudes: A demodulation and interference effect.

A form of "remote synchronization" was recently described, wherein amplitude fluctuations across a ring of non-identical, non-linear electronic oscillators become entrained into spatially-structured patterns. According to linear models and mutual information, synchronization and causality dip at a certain distance, then recover before eventually fading. Here, the underlying mechanism is finally elucidated through novel experiments and simulations. The system non-linearity is found to have a dual role: it supports chaotic dynamics, and it enables the energy exchange between the lower and higher sidebands of a predominant frequency. This frequency acts as carrier signal in an arrangement resembling standard amplitude modulation, wherein the lower sideband and the demodulated baseband signals spectrally overlap. Due to a spatially-dependent phase relationship, at a certain distance near-complete destructive interference occurs between them, causing the observed dip. Methods suitable for detecting non-trivial entrainment, such as transfer entropy and the auxiliary system approach, nevertheless, reveal that synchronization and causality actually decrease with distance monotonically. Remoteness is, therefore, arguably only apparent, as also reflected in the propagation of external perturbations. These results demonstrate a complex mechanism of dynamical interdependence, and exemplify how it can lead to incorrectly inferring synchronization and causality.

[1]  Mikhail Prokopenko,et al.  Differentiating information transfer and causal effect , 2008, 0812.4373.

[2]  Schreiber,et al.  Measuring information transfer , 2000, Physical review letters.

[3]  L Fortuna,et al.  Remote synchronization in star networks. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Ingo Fischer,et al.  Synchronization in simple network motifs with negligible correlation and mutual information measures. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[5]  A. Ledberg,et al.  When two become one: the limits of causality analysis of brain dynamics. , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  Adilson E Motter,et al.  Incoherence-Mediated Remote Synchronization. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[7]  Peter A. Tass,et al.  Variability of spatio-temporal patterns in non-homogeneous rings of spiking neurons. , 2011, Chaos.

[8]  S. Boccaletti,et al.  Synchronization of chaotic systems , 2001 .

[9]  Y. Kuramoto,et al.  Strong desynchronizing effects of weak noise in globally coupled systems. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  A. Kraskov,et al.  Estimating mutual information. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Albert Y. Zomaya,et al.  Local measures of information storage in complex distributed computation , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[12]  Boualem Boashash,et al.  Estimating and interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal. II. A/lgorithms and applications , 1992, Proc. IEEE.

[13]  Viola Priesemann,et al.  Measuring Information-Transfer Delays , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  Luigi Fortuna,et al.  Inhomogeneity induces relay synchronization in complex networks. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[15]  Raul Vicente,et al.  Zero-lag long-range synchronization via dynamical relaying. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[16]  Liam Paninski,et al.  Estimation of Entropy and Mutual Information , 2003, Neural Computation.

[17]  Espen A. F. Ihlen,et al.  Introduction to Multifractal Detrended Fluctuation Analysis in Matlab , 2012, Front. Physio..

[18]  Luca Faes,et al.  Information Decomposition in Bivariate Systems: Theory and Application to Cardiorespiratory Dynamics , 2015, Entropy.

[19]  Luca Faes,et al.  Estimating the decomposition of predictive information in multivariate systems. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  L. Faes,et al.  Assessment of Granger Causality by Nonlinear Model Identification: Application to Short-term Cardiovascular Variability , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews the Contribution of Tms–eeg Coregistration in the Exploration of the Human Cortical Connectome , 2022 .

[22]  Bruno Cessac,et al.  Transmitting a signal by amplitude modulation in a chaotic network , 2005, Chaos.

[23]  Gordon Pipa,et al.  Transfer entropy—a model-free measure of effective connectivity for the neurosciences , 2010, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[24]  R Sevilla-Escoboza,et al.  Generalized synchronization in relay systems with instantaneous coupling. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  Louis M Pecora,et al.  Synchronization of chaotic systems. , 2015, Chaos.

[26]  T. Duke,et al.  Physical basis of two-tone interference in hearing , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  E. Ott.  Chaos in Dynamical Systems: Contents , 2002 .

[28]  Vito Latora,et al.  Remote synchronization reveals network symmetries and functional modules. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[29]  S Yanchuk,et al.  Routes to complex dynamics in a ring of unidirectionally coupled systems. , 2010, Chaos.

[30]  C. Granger.  Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[31]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series , 1982 .

[32]  J. Teramae,et al.  Robustness of the noise-induced phase synchronization in a general class of limit cycle oscillators. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[33]  N. Packard,et al.  POWER SPECTRA AND MIXING PROPERTIES OF STRANGE ATTRACTORS , 1980 .

[34]  D. Abrams,et al.  Chimera states: coexistence of coherence and incoherence in networks of coupled oscillators , 2014, 1403.6204.

[35]  L. Faes,et al.  Atypical transistor-based chaotic oscillators: Design, realization, and diversity. , 2017, Chaos.

[36]  Luigi Fortuna,et al.  Analysis of remote synchronization in complex networks. , 2013, Chaos.

[37]  Daniel Chicharro,et al.  Reliable detection of directional couplings using rank statistics. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[38]  Francesco Sorrentino,et al.  Symmetries, Cluster Synchronization, and Isolated Desynchronization in Complex Networks , 2013, 1309.6605.

[39]  I Fischer,et al.  Role of delay for the symmetry in the dynamics of networks. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[40]  Fraser,et al.  Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[41]  A. Seth,et al.  Granger causality and transfer entropy are equivalent for Gaussian variables. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[42]  H. Abarbanel,et al.  Generalized synchronization of chaos: The auxiliary system approach. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[43]  L. Minati.  Remote synchronization of amplitudes across an experimental ring of non-linear oscillators. , 2015, Chaos.

[44]  S. Strogatz,et al.  Chimera states for coupled oscillators. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[45]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Cross-frequency coupling in real and virtual brain networks , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[46]  E. Ward.  A review and comparison of four commonly used Bayesian and maximum likelihood model selection tools , 2008 .

[47]  J. Letelier,et al.  Amplitude Modulation Patterns of Local Field Potentials Reveal Asynchronous Neuronal Populations , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  Biyu J. He.  Scale-free brain activity: past, present, and future , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  Jurgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization in complex networks , 2008, 0805.2976.