Investigating the relationship between planning reliability and project performance

Variability is a well-known problem in construction projects, which leads to the general deterioration of project performance. During the last decade, the Last Planner System (LPS™), a production planning and control system based on lean production principles, has been increasingly applied in the construction industry to improve planning reliability reducing the negative impacts of variability. LPS™ promotes actions to increase planning reliability, monitoring the percentage of plan completed (PPC) in a short-term period. However, there is limited research evidence about the relationship between planning reliability and project performance. In this paper, the authors report on a detailed research analysing this relationship during the construction phase of a home building project at activity and project levels. By doing so, two indexes are proposed: an activity planning reliability index called the process reliability index (PRI), and a project aggregate labour productivity index, called the project productivity index (PPI). Statistical analyses using the proposed indexes were conducted showing positive and strong relationships between planning reliability and performance at activity and project levels. Finally, the research findings provide the guidelines of a preliminary methodology to forecast the impacts of planning reliability over project performance, when lean production methodologies are applied in project planning and control.

[1]  Joao Auada Junior,et al.  Last Planner as a Site Operations Tool , 1998 .

[2]  Russell Kenley Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 19-21 July 2005 , 2005 .

[3]  Michael J Horman Process dynamics : buffer management in building project operations , 2000 .

[4]  Luis F. Alarcón,et al.  INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PLANNING RELIABILITY AND PROJECT PERFORMANCE: A CASE STUDY , 2007 .

[5]  Antonio Sergio Itri Conte Last Planner, Look Ahead, PPC: a Driver to the Site Operations , 1998 .

[6]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  SHIELDING PRODUCTION: ESSENTIAL STEP IN PRODUCTION CONTROL , 1998 .

[7]  Leonhard E. Bernold,et al.  Placement‐Oriented Design and Delivery of Concrete Reinforcement , 1993 .

[8]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[9]  Herman Glenn Ballard,et al.  THE LAST PLANNER SYSTEM OF PRODUCTION CONTROL , 2000 .

[10]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  Project Management under Uncertainty: The Impact of Heuristics and Biases , 2002 .

[11]  Glenn Ballard,et al.  LOOKAHEAD PLANNING: THE MISSING LINK IN PRODUCTION CONTROL , 1997 .

[12]  Luis F. Alarcón,et al.  Playing Games: Evaluating the Impact of Lean Production Strategies on Project Cost and Schedule , 1999 .

[13]  David Kh Chua,et al.  Impact of Variability on Construction Schedules , 2005 .

[14]  Greg Howell,et al.  Implementing Lean Construction: Stabilizing Work Flow , 1997 .

[15]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Factory physics : foundations of manufacturing management , 1996 .

[16]  Glenn Ballard,et al.  PARC: A Case Study , 1996 .

[17]  James P. Womack,et al.  Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation , 1996 .

[18]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  Improving Labor Flow Reliability for Better Productivity as Lean Construction Principle , 2003 .

[19]  Glenn Ballard,et al.  Lean construction and EPC performance improvement , 1997 .

[20]  Luis F. Alarcón,et al.  Assessing the Impacts of Implementing Lean Construction , 2008 .

[21]  Sven Bertelsen,et al.  COMPLEXITY – CONSTRUCTION IN A NEW PERSPECTIVE , 2003 .

[22]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  DYNAMIC PLANNING AND CONTROL METHODOLOGY FOR DESIGN/BUILD FAST-TRACK CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS , 2001 .

[23]  Ivica Završki,et al.  Reducing Variability to Improve Performance as a Lean Construction Principle , 2002 .

[24]  Tariq S. Abdelhamid,et al.  Comparing Process Improvement Initiatives Based on Percent Plan Complete and Labour Utilization Factors , 2003 .

[25]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  Factors affecting project success in the piping function , 1997 .

[26]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  Interaction between subcycles: one key to improved methods , 1993 .

[27]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  PARADE GAME :I MPACT OF WORK FLOW VARIABILITY ON TRADE PERFORMANCE , 1999 .

[28]  C. MarioFiallo,et al.  Applying the Last Planner Control System to a Construction Project - A Case Study in Quito, Ecuador , 2002 .