TEC: A Time Evolving Contextual Graph Model for Speaker State Analysis in Political Debates

Political discourses provide a forum for representatives to express their opinions and contribute towards policy making. Analyzing these discussions is crucial for recognizing possible delegates and making better voting choices in an independent nation. A politician’s vote on a proposition is usually associated with their past discourses and impacted by cohesion forces in political parties. We focus on predicting a speaker’s vote on a bill by augmenting linguistic models with temporal and cohesion contexts. We propose TEC, a time evolving graph based model that jointly employs links between motions, speakers, and temporal politician states. TEC outperforms competitive models, illustrating the benefit of temporal and contextual signals for predicting a politician’s stance.

[1]  S. Frid-Nielsen Human rights or security? Positions on asylum in European Parliament speeches , 2018 .

[2]  Teun A. van Dijk,et al.  Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse , 1977 .

[3]  Ramit Sawhney,et al.  Investigating Political Herd Mentality: A Community Sentiment Based Approach , 2019, ACL.

[4]  S. Slembrouck The parliamentary Hansard ‘verbatim’ report: the written construction of spoken discourse , 1992 .

[5]  Ramit Sawhney,et al.  GPolS: A Contextual Graph-Based Language Model for Analyzing Parliamentary Debates and Political Cohesion , 2020, COLING.

[6]  Stefan Bode,et al.  Demystifying “free will”: The role of contextual information and evidence accumulation for predictive brain activity , 2014, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[7]  Dan Goldwasser,et al.  Understanding the Language of Political Agreement and Disagreement in Legislative Texts , 2020, ACL.

[8]  J. Zaller,et al.  A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics , 2012, Perspectives on Politics.

[9]  Yi Li,et al.  Opinion-aware Knowledge Graph for Political Ideology Detection , 2017, IJCAI.

[10]  Mohit Sharma,et al.  Analysis of Parliamentary Debate Transcripts Using Community-Based Graphical Approaches (Student Abstract) , 2020, AAAI.

[11]  Teun A. van Dijk,et al.  Text and Context of parliamentary debates , 2004 .

[12]  Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier,et al.  Time is of the Essence: Event History Models in Political Science , 1997 .

[13]  S. Hix,et al.  Power to the Parties: Cohesion and Competition in the European Parliament, 1979–2001 , 2005, British Journal of Political Science.

[14]  Pietro Liò,et al.  Graph Attention Networks , 2017, ICLR.

[15]  Ming-Wei Chang,et al.  BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding , 2019, NAACL.

[16]  Riza Batista-Navarro,et al.  'Aye' or 'No'? Speech-level Sentiment Analysis of Hansard UK Parliamentary Debate Transcripts , 2018, LREC.

[17]  Nicole Curato A sequential analysis of democratic deliberation , 2012 .

[18]  Riza Batista-Navarro,et al.  ParlVote: A Corpus for Sentiment Analysis of Political Debates , 2020, LREC.

[19]  Katarzyna Budzynska,et al.  A Deep Modular RNN Approach for Ethos Mining , 2018, IJCAI.

[20]  I. Hampsher-Monk,et al.  Political Languages in Time - The Work of J. G. A. Pocock , 1984, British Journal of Political Science.

[21]  Randolph B. Tarrier,et al.  Groups , 1973, Algebra.